PNP Abuse
#1
PNP Abuse
Want PNP? Here's what guys are doing to get it...(I think)
Pilot A has a carryover trip XXX into the next bid month, and bids VTO. Before the SWW opens, (24-48 hrs?), the company takes a snapshot of all the VTO awardee calendars for planning purposes. When the SWW opens, Pilot A bids trips that conflict with this carryover trip. Hopefully, somehow, the following will take place:
Section 25.D.2.g
Carryover CH will not be part of the BLG/RLG for a secondary line except as provided in Section 25.E.4.b.iii. If it is not possible to build a secondary line within the line spread without creating a conflict, then the line will be built below the spread. I such case, the difference between the secondary line's BLG/RLG, and the applicable crew position's regular line average BLG shall be eligible for Priority Non-Premium (PNP) make-up.
Here's where/how the abuse occurs:
After the snapshot is taken, Pilot A's buddy, Pilot B, who also has a VTO next month, takes Trip XXX of Pilot A's calendar AFTER his snapshot was taken (so the snapshot of Pilot B's calendar shows no carryover trip, but now has one for SWW). Pilot B bids during SWW accordingly to conflict with Trip XXX that wasn't present when the snapshot was taken. VTOs are made, conflict is created, PNP, yadda-yadda-yadda.
Now, I KNOW this is happening because I've watched VTO holders calendars and carryover trips are moved along the timeframe described above. Not sure if protecting min days off is triggering PNP also?
Welcome your comments and shots at my theory.
Pilot A has a carryover trip XXX into the next bid month, and bids VTO. Before the SWW opens, (24-48 hrs?), the company takes a snapshot of all the VTO awardee calendars for planning purposes. When the SWW opens, Pilot A bids trips that conflict with this carryover trip. Hopefully, somehow, the following will take place:
Section 25.D.2.g
Carryover CH will not be part of the BLG/RLG for a secondary line except as provided in Section 25.E.4.b.iii. If it is not possible to build a secondary line within the line spread without creating a conflict, then the line will be built below the spread. I such case, the difference between the secondary line's BLG/RLG, and the applicable crew position's regular line average BLG shall be eligible for Priority Non-Premium (PNP) make-up.
Here's where/how the abuse occurs:
After the snapshot is taken, Pilot A's buddy, Pilot B, who also has a VTO next month, takes Trip XXX of Pilot A's calendar AFTER his snapshot was taken (so the snapshot of Pilot B's calendar shows no carryover trip, but now has one for SWW). Pilot B bids during SWW accordingly to conflict with Trip XXX that wasn't present when the snapshot was taken. VTOs are made, conflict is created, PNP, yadda-yadda-yadda.
Now, I KNOW this is happening because I've watched VTO holders calendars and carryover trips are moved along the timeframe described above. Not sure if protecting min days off is triggering PNP also?
Welcome your comments and shots at my theory.
#2
#3
I don't believe you're eligible for PNP for Carryover trip Conflicts picked up/created after the snapshot. I think that's the cutoff point.
I may be wrong, but I believe the Carryover trip credit just gets applied to your SLG schedule construction BLG.
I may be wrong, but I believe the Carryover trip credit just gets applied to your SLG schedule construction BLG.
#4
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 44
Want PNP? Here's what guys are doing to get it...(I think)
Pilot A has a carryover trip XXX into the next bid month, and bids VTO. Before the SWW opens, (24-48 hrs?), the company takes a snapshot of all the VTO awardee calendars for planning purposes. When the SWW opens, Pilot A bids trips that conflict with this carryover trip. Hopefully, somehow, the following will take place:
Section 25.D.2.g
Carryover CH will not be part of the BLG/RLG for a secondary line except as provided in Section 25.E.4.b.iii. If it is not possible to build a secondary line within the line spread without creating a conflict, then the line will be built below the spread. I such case, the difference between the secondary line's BLG/RLG, and the applicable crew position's regular line average BLG shall be eligible for Priority Non-Premium (PNP) make-up.
Here's where/how the abuse occurs:
After the snapshot is taken, Pilot A's buddy, Pilot B, who also has a VTO next month, takes Trip XXX of Pilot A's calendar AFTER his snapshot was taken (so the snapshot of Pilot B's calendar shows no carryover trip, but now has one for SWW). Pilot B bids during SWW accordingly to conflict with Trip XXX that wasn't present when the snapshot was taken. VTOs are made, conflict is created, PNP, yadda-yadda-yadda.
Now, I KNOW this is happening because I've watched VTO holders calendars and carryover trips are moved along the timeframe described above. Not sure if protecting min days off is triggering PNP also?
Welcome your comments and shots at my theory.
Pilot A has a carryover trip XXX into the next bid month, and bids VTO. Before the SWW opens, (24-48 hrs?), the company takes a snapshot of all the VTO awardee calendars for planning purposes. When the SWW opens, Pilot A bids trips that conflict with this carryover trip. Hopefully, somehow, the following will take place:
Section 25.D.2.g
Carryover CH will not be part of the BLG/RLG for a secondary line except as provided in Section 25.E.4.b.iii. If it is not possible to build a secondary line within the line spread without creating a conflict, then the line will be built below the spread. I such case, the difference between the secondary line's BLG/RLG, and the applicable crew position's regular line average BLG shall be eligible for Priority Non-Premium (PNP) make-up.
Here's where/how the abuse occurs:
After the snapshot is taken, Pilot A's buddy, Pilot B, who also has a VTO next month, takes Trip XXX of Pilot A's calendar AFTER his snapshot was taken (so the snapshot of Pilot B's calendar shows no carryover trip, but now has one for SWW). Pilot B bids during SWW accordingly to conflict with Trip XXX that wasn't present when the snapshot was taken. VTOs are made, conflict is created, PNP, yadda-yadda-yadda.
Now, I KNOW this is happening because I've watched VTO holders calendars and carryover trips are moved along the timeframe described above. Not sure if protecting min days off is triggering PNP also?
Welcome your comments and shots at my theory.
PS I hate PNP and hope it goes away next contract.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
That theory sounds pretty complicated. The only time I ever got PNP was when I had a carryover trip into a VTO, and didn’t select any c/o credit hours to be credited towards the VTO. Basically I had a carryover trip and did nothing. Also didn’t request a trip in conflict.
#6
I started thread because I was trying to point out abuse. Appreciate your responses because I’m scratching my head.
I happen to KNOW Pilot A and Pilot B, so I do KNOW this is happening. I’ve watched the same trip being used twice during SWW processing and was trying to figure out why. Hence my post. Now, whether or not it triggers PNP, is what I’m trying to figure out, maybe sometimes it does, maybe it doesn’t.
Lastly, cargoforlife, I got on our ALPA website, I could not find that email discussing this topic. If you or someone has it readily available, please post.
I happen to KNOW Pilot A and Pilot B, so I do KNOW this is happening. I’ve watched the same trip being used twice during SWW processing and was trying to figure out why. Hence my post. Now, whether or not it triggers PNP, is what I’m trying to figure out, maybe sometimes it does, maybe it doesn’t.
Lastly, cargoforlife, I got on our ALPA website, I could not find that email discussing this topic. If you or someone has it readily available, please post.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: Wichita
Posts: 667
Want PNP? Here's what guys are doing to get it...(I think)
Pilot A has a carryover trip XXX into the next bid month, and bids VTO. Before the SWW opens, (24-48 hrs?), the company takes a snapshot of all the VTO awardee calendars for planning purposes. When the SWW opens, Pilot A bids trips that conflict with this carryover trip. Hopefully, somehow, the following will take place:
Section 25.D.2.g
Carryover CH will not be part of the BLG/RLG for a secondary line except as provided in Section 25.E.4.b.iii. If it is not possible to build a secondary line within the line spread without creating a conflict, then the line will be built below the spread. I such case, the difference between the secondary line's BLG/RLG, and the applicable crew position's regular line average BLG shall be eligible for Priority Non-Premium (PNP) make-up.
Here's where/how the abuse occurs:
After the snapshot is taken, Pilot A's buddy, Pilot B, who also has a VTO next month, takes Trip XXX of Pilot A's calendar AFTER his snapshot was taken (so the snapshot of Pilot B's calendar shows no carryover trip, but now has one for SWW). Pilot B bids during SWW accordingly to conflict with Trip XXX that wasn't present when the snapshot was taken. VTOs are made, conflict is created, PNP, yadda-yadda-yadda.
Now, I KNOW this is happening because I've watched VTO holders calendars and carryover trips are moved along the timeframe described above. Not sure if protecting min days off is triggering PNP also?
Welcome your comments and shots at my theory.
Pilot A has a carryover trip XXX into the next bid month, and bids VTO. Before the SWW opens, (24-48 hrs?), the company takes a snapshot of all the VTO awardee calendars for planning purposes. When the SWW opens, Pilot A bids trips that conflict with this carryover trip. Hopefully, somehow, the following will take place:
Section 25.D.2.g
Carryover CH will not be part of the BLG/RLG for a secondary line except as provided in Section 25.E.4.b.iii. If it is not possible to build a secondary line within the line spread without creating a conflict, then the line will be built below the spread. I such case, the difference between the secondary line's BLG/RLG, and the applicable crew position's regular line average BLG shall be eligible for Priority Non-Premium (PNP) make-up.
Here's where/how the abuse occurs:
After the snapshot is taken, Pilot A's buddy, Pilot B, who also has a VTO next month, takes Trip XXX of Pilot A's calendar AFTER his snapshot was taken (so the snapshot of Pilot B's calendar shows no carryover trip, but now has one for SWW). Pilot B bids during SWW accordingly to conflict with Trip XXX that wasn't present when the snapshot was taken. VTOs are made, conflict is created, PNP, yadda-yadda-yadda.
Now, I KNOW this is happening because I've watched VTO holders calendars and carryover trips are moved along the timeframe described above. Not sure if protecting min days off is triggering PNP also?
Welcome your comments and shots at my theory.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post