Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Min guarantee concessions >

Min guarantee concessions

Search
Notices

Min guarantee concessions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2020, 12:41 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by 11man View Post
I’d recommend against the reduced block. When we did the reduced we ended up keeping more people on the property but many of the junior people we saved proceeded to do draft and volunteer and prolonged our stay in reduced hours. We would have been better off with a furlough.
Depends on how you define “we”. Not all of “we” (us) would have been better off. And it wasn’t junior guys flying carryover each month that kept us in it longer. Are you part of the Semper I club that stood up at union meetings advocating furlough instead of abiding by a contractual provision you voted for?
BLOB is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 12:51 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Squeakygreaser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 173
Default

Thanks all for the info, sounds like this was not a perfect or universally liked solution. I did read a bit of the contract, but the way it ended up was that only some people ended up with lower credit schedules? I suppose that is a logical outcome.

I guess I see why our union is not bringing us anything to vote on, it sounds like this was pretty contentious.
​​​
Squeakygreaser is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 12:53 PM
  #23  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Narrow body 4a2b; been there, done that, got the tee shirt to prove it. No thanks. IMO the entire subsection should have been stricken from the CBA, but what do I know. Sharing the pain is fine as long as everyone shares the pain, which will never happen. And BTW, I voted for the 2015 contract.

Is it time to complain about lie flat seats again?
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:00 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Default

Originally Posted by BLOB View Post
Depends on how you define “we”. Not all of “we” (us) would have been better off. And it wasn’t junior guys flying carryover each month that kept us in it longer. Are you part of the Semper I club that stood up at union meetings advocating furlough instead of abiding by a contractual provision you voted for?
And sir you win post of the day. Many senior bubbas said one thing and acted in other ways. Sounds like the past 5 months with the virus issues. The same crowd ****ing and moaning a few months ago are the ones flying 25 days a month and taking every draft they can. HKG is a great example. The screams on Jetflyers would not stop. You then look up the schedules of those screams and its packed full. I was also getting screen shots from buds of these two faced buffoons schedules.

Thats how it always shakes out some win and some lose no matter what you do or write into a CBA.
Noworkallplay is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:02 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
No voter here.

Kronan, why the @#$%^& did you vote yes for that POS?

I remember right before the TA, there were many, many flights being cancelled for lack of crews.

Delta voted no and got a better deal within 6 months IIRC.

We had leverage, and once again, the union ****ed it away.
Lol.....we aren’t Delta. And never will be.
seefive is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:10 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by seefive View Post
Lol.....we aren’t Delta. And never will be.
And that’s a good thing...
BLOB is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:10 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,376
Default

Whatever happened to Delta plus a nickel?
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:16 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by Noworkallplay View Post
This is the point I was trying to make above. Some people bit the bullet and accepted reduced BLG and others picked up everything they could. Furthermore certain seats and certain bases didn't have reduced BLG. The new language is suppose to keep this from happening again I guess. Bottom line is some won and some lost it wasn't equal.
It’s never been equal and the new language doesn’t make it even. It’s a seniority system and the most senior will do better. They’ll continue to bid carryover and won’t be hurt too much, if at all. That’s the way it should be. I’m not senior, but I could be very senior if I stayed as an FO. My range (70%) would lose big, but no one made me upgrade.

My biggest gripe with the agreement was reserve. It’s a little better than it was before (15 or 19 days at a drastically reduced RLG), but it could have been fixed by giving a min pay per reserve day. I’d even take 4.5 hours as a minimum.
golfandfly is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:20 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
Whatever happened to Delta plus a nickel?
We may get that soon.

Some people here just don’t value their contribution to the company. They’ll throw enough scraps for certain segments to get 50%. Sick leave, advance notice payout, etc.
golfandfly is offline  
Old 05-22-2020, 01:28 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser View Post
Thanks all for the info, sounds like this was not a perfect or universally liked solution. I did read a bit of the contract, but the way it ended up was that only some people ended up with lower credit schedules? I suppose that is a logical outcome.

I guess I see why our union is not bringing us anything to vote on, it sounds like this was pretty contentious.
​​​
Of course it is contentious...it’s asking for shared sacrifice in hard times. It’s $. People all have different priorities and loyalties. That doesn’t mean it can’t be a good idea to save jobs.

As you’ve heard here, some will sacrifice more than others and some will benefit more than others. Good contracts can minimize but not entirely avoid that. It seems the junior folks in their seat lose the most but they also have the biggest risk in furlough and the most to gain by not furloughing. A very junior guy in a junior seat might have seen some of the biggest BLG cuts but he kept his job. That junior captain or WB FO who says we should have furloughed ignores the fact that the furlough they advocate for would likely come with a re-alignment bid and he might have to go to training to take that pay cut...but hey he can have a full BLG at a lower pay rate.

It’s important for junior guys who don’t get furloughed because guys took a pay cut for them, need to appreciate that fact. And we need to remember that the next time things get tough and we are asked to take one for the team.

That being said, the statement that junior guys flying draft extended 4a2b might be the most ignorant thing I’ve heard. The guys who were in danger of getting furloughed nearly all ended up on the 727 panel, the most overmanned seat. There was no extra or draft to fly.
BLOB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SureJetz
ExpressJet
14
09-02-2019 12:19 PM
Flea Bite
Major
10
05-15-2015 01:19 PM
Da40Pilot
Regional
59
01-13-2015 07:20 AM
viperdriver
Cargo
4
11-25-2010 06:56 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
05-26-2005 03:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices