Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
MEM 777/MD-11 pilots be warned >

MEM 777/MD-11 pilots be warned

Search
Notices

MEM 777/MD-11 pilots be warned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2020, 06:19 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by MEMA300 View Post
Has any of this info made it to public outlets? No way this is acceptable and really hard to grasp. FX is rich corp and can afford to put us in real hospitals. This must be some gov requirement that mangmrt hs no control over. So no layovers In China and HK
I believe that’s it’s Hong Kong rules and we have no control. Personally, there is no way I’d accept a leg that goes into HKG until this gets fixed.
golfandfly is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 06:59 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,376
Default

So what happens if you refuse to fly the leg?

Before, you could refuse a leg that went to the country that shall not be named, but is that also true for the city that cannot be named?

We need to know the ramifications if we refuse to fly a scheduled leg.
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 07:14 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer View Post
So what happens if you refuse to fly the leg?

Before, you could refuse a leg that went to the country that shall not be named, but is that also true for the city that cannot be named?

We need to know the ramifications if we refuse to fly a scheduled leg.
I’m thinking this falls under IMSAFE (stress?).

Even if you tested before the trip, you could have caught it at AOC five minutes later. What if another crewmember or jumpseater caught it? Now you are quarantining in your cell. The possibilities are endless and we all know there’s been a huge uptick in cases.

Just like those that chose not to fly into Unnamed country (initially when they started testing), there just isn’t any way I’d accept the leg. If you say that you don’t feel it’s safe, I’m not concerned about the fallout.
golfandfly is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 07:58 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Default

How did UA and AA get this handled so quickly? Was it the union putting their foot down, or the company trying to avoid a very complicated situation? Or a little bit of both? I realize that neither carrier had a lot of flights going into HKG anyway, but still I applaud their immediate and decisive reaction.
flugenmachen is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 08:27 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2020
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by flugenmachen View Post
How did UA and AA get this handled so quickly? Was it the union putting their foot down, or the company trying to avoid a very complicated situation? Or a little bit of both? I realize that neither carrier had a lot of flights going into HKG anyway, but still I applaud their immediate and decisive reaction.
AA guy here. The union said no to this. After we said no I think the company thought about it more and went yeah that seems like a good plan.
Downtime is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 09:53 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by Downtime View Post
AA guy here. The union said no to this. After we said no I think the company thought about it more and went yeah that seems like a good plan.
Thanks for that information! Sounds like we have a weaker union.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 07-22-2020, 10:47 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 108
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12 View Post
Thanks for that information! Sounds like we have a weaker union.

You just be forgetting there is a domicile in HKG lol. So you want to the union to tell the company to stop HKG layovers like AA and UAL did when we have 180 pilots + families living out here? It’s obviously a very unique situation.....
BrulesRulez is offline  
Old 07-23-2020, 10:05 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by BrulesRulez View Post
You just be forgetting there is a domicile in HKG lol. So you want to the union to tell the company to stop HKG layovers like AA and UAL did when we have 180 pilots + families living out here? It’s obviously a very unique situation.....
Of course it’s unique, but the problem appears to be with those pilots laying over there, not the HKG guys, as they are allowing HKG based pilots who live there quarantine in their homes. For now.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 07-23-2020, 01:57 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: 11CA
Posts: 47
Default 2.03 safety and crewmember responsibility

FAR 121.135

Safety is the most important consideration in all FedEx operations. The operating philosophy at FedEx also supports the conclusion that safety is an essential ingredient to commercial success. In the course of flight operations, several factors must be given due consideration by all flight crewmembers. The most important include Safety, Legality, and Reliability.

The following items describe the key crewmember responsibilities as they relate to the primary responsibility – Safety:

• During times when various priorities of safety, legality, and reliability appear to be in conflict, it is the responsibility of all crewmembers in general, and the Captain in particular, to ensure that safety remains the primary focus.

• Any uncertainty regarding the safety of an operation is to be questioned and satisfactorily resolved before that operation is conducted or continued.
Red Letter is offline  
Old 07-23-2020, 02:59 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,186
Default

Originally Posted by Red Letter View Post
FAR 121.135

Safety is the most important consideration in all FedEx operations. The operating philosophy at FedEx also supports the conclusion that safety is an essential ingredient to commercial success. In the course of flight operations, several factors must be given due consideration by all flight crewmembers. The most important include Safety, Legality, and Reliability.

The following items describe the key crewmember responsibilities as they relate to the primary responsibility – Safety:

• During times when various priorities of safety, legality, and reliability appear to be in conflict, it is the responsibility of all crewmembers in general, and the Captain in particular, to ensure that safety remains the primary focus.

• Any uncertainty regarding the safety of an operation is to be questioned and satisfactorily resolved before that operation is conducted or continued.
Just to clarify...would this be considered unsafe?

“Firsthand accounts of beds only a few feet apart from very ill patients and shared diagnostic equipment do not equate to a standard of care........“
Rock is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flogger
GoJet
41
10-01-2022 06:29 PM
whalesurfer
Cargo
7
12-03-2019 10:45 AM
SpecialTracking
United
158
06-21-2019 03:59 PM
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices