2% pay raise in Oct 2020
#21
You dont think we havent already asked for a yearly 3% raise post amendable date? Think it got soundly rejected, know why? They pay for those 3-4% pay raises by efficiency give backs like SIG SLA, lay flat seats, deviation language, training conflict, best fit for R-days and the list goes on and on and on. How would they pay for that 3% payraise every year post amendable date? Gee I went to state college and understand these company negotiators better than most ALPA ride or die pilots. SMDH.
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
As for the “snap up” United got it because they were willing to sign an extension. This meant they made no contractual gains except for pay rates. American got a pay raise outside of section 6 but once again no other gains on their below par work rules. Plus how do snap ups work when you are in negotiations and the other airline you snap up off of also is strung out in negotiations for 3-5 years. How long do you think it will take AA, UA and DL to get another CBA? UA has already been in negotiations for almost 3 years.
#23
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Its actually not a crock. That provision didn't even exist prior to 2015. Also many more flight meet the higher class of service threshold now than prior to 2015. So we can deal in facts or conjecture. Now can we build of the current language, yes. But to say its a crock is to not understand that other airlines dont even have it.
#24
Its actually not a crock. That provision didn't even exist prior to 2015. Also many more flight meet the higher class of service threshold now than prior to 2015. So we can deal in facts or conjecture. Now can we build of the current language, yes. But to say its a crock is to not understand that other airlines dont even have it.
if it was so good why did the union grieve it and loose. I was told smugly by the Neg Chair during last contracts peep show that it was all taken care of in the notes! Well we found out how good his notes were!
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Its actually not a crock. That provision didn't even exist prior to 2015. Also many more flight meet the higher class of service threshold now than prior to 2015. So we can deal in facts or conjecture. Now can we build of the current language, yes. But to say its a crock is to not understand that other airlines dont even have it.
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
What the hell are you talking about? Before 2015, when you were authorized first, you got first (if it was available). There was no lay flat provision. Many of us inquired about this during the sales job, and we were assured we were wrong (straight from the negotiation chairman’s mouth).
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
As for NB/WB fleet mix, why is that even in a discussion of contract negotiations? Fleet makeup is strictly management’s rights. They choose the tools they feel are needed for the business model they create. We simply negotiate pay and work rules to operate those tools. If they decided to add kites, then we would negotiate for that as well. But we never choose fleet mix. It should NEVER be included in any discussion comparing pay with other pilots!
#28
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Business Class is NOT First Class.
Prior to 2015, we were getting FC on flights with over 10 or more scheduled block hours (8.A.5.c.iii). This contracted added 8.A.5.c.i language, which the company used to trump the other provision. It was grieved and we lost. So, on the AA flight that had three class service from HKG to DFW, we now fly in Business.
All because the guys that were on the negotiating committee weren't listening when all of this was pointed out to them. They didn't understand International flying. They didn't understand Hotel-in-Lieu and they didn't understand long deadheads.
Maybe you need to go find a copy of the 2011 contract, but below is the old relevant section. When you look at the 2015 contract, you will see that NOTHING changed for domestic, so your statement above is false. We did add the 2:30 block for purely international DHs.
a. Deadhead travel shall be booked in coach class unless a higher
class of service is authorized.
b. A class of service higher than coach shall be authorized if:
i. a deadhead exceeds 5 scheduled block hours; or
ii. a deadhead is included in a single duty period exceeding
11:30; or
iii. the scheduled block hours of a revenue flight plus the
scheduled block hours of a deadhead in a single duty
period exceed 8 hours. However, if a domestic duty period
does not exceed 11:30 and a deadhead within that duty
period does not exceed 1:30 (OAG) block, the deadhead
may be scheduled in coach.
c. Higher Class of Service
i. If a higher class of service is authorized on a deadhead
with less than 10 scheduled block hours, such service shall
be booked in Business or First Class at the Company’s
option, subject to availability on the scheduled flight.
ii. If a deadhead has 10 or more scheduled block hours, the
travel shall be booked in the following order based upon
availability on the scheduled flight:
(a) First Class (discounted);
(b) Business Class (full fare or discounted);
(c) First Class (full fare).
iii. If the deadhead is scheduled for more than 16 hours duty,
the following shall apply:
(a) The flight must be a non-stop flight; and
(b) A special booking priority shall apply to deadheads
scheduled over 16 hours. That priority shall be:
(1) Discounted first class;
(2) Full fare first class;
(3) Business class; and
(c) The Company shall ensure that Corporate Travel
(or any subsequent Company designated travel
administrator) attempts to secure first class seating at
the earliest practical point in the planning process. If
Corporate Travel is unable to book first class at the
time the initial booking is made, Corporate Travel shall
notify the pilot who is awarded that trip, via e-mail, of
the unavailability of first class.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post