Enough talking, it's time for Action!
07-12-2021, 12:30 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,621
Originally Posted by USMCFDX
They have had multiple briefs form them and my understanding is they have been on a continual retainer.
Unless FedEx thinks the Pancake Plan is more expensive than other options to improve or retirement, it will be in a TA.
Unless FedEx thinks the Pancake Plan is more expensive than other options to improve or retirement, it will be in a TA.
And you are correct, which ever plan is cheapest and least liability will be in the TA.
07-12-2021, 03:30 PM
#12
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
BINGO. During the last computer Q&A, they mentioned they have all kinds of advisors including financial advisors on retainer during contract negotiations. Someone asked a question specifically which financial advisors were on retainer and the question was not answered -- they tip toed around it.
And you are correct, which ever plan is cheapest and least liability will be in the TA.
And you are correct, which ever plan is cheapest and least liability will be in the TA.
Hold on now. The mantra from many naysayers was the PSPP was cheaper. It was junk and the company would laugh if we agreed to it.
It sounds like many are realizing this isn't the case. I have been told its actually more expensive in the short term (10 years). This is due to front end funding of the stabilization feature and the floor funding.
Funny how certain people have constantly moved the reasoning why they are appossed. It changes weekly.
So if the company wants to deal with our current plan did we get the wool pulled over our eyes and fall back into the cheaper plan for the company?
07-12-2021, 03:39 PM
#13
Fill'er Up Again
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,089
Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
Hold on now. The mantra from many naysayers was the PSPP was cheaper. It was junk and the company would laugh if we agreed to it.
It sounds like many are realizing this isn't the case. I have been told its actually more expensive in the short term (10 years). This is due to front end funding of the stabilization feature and the floor funding.
Funny how certain people have constantly moved the reasoning why they are appossed. It changes weekly.
So if the company wants to deal with our current plan did we get the wool pulled over our eyes and fall back into the cheaper plan for the company?
It sounds like many are realizing this isn't the case. I have been told its actually more expensive in the short term (10 years). This is due to front end funding of the stabilization feature and the floor funding.
Funny how certain people have constantly moved the reasoning why they are appossed. It changes weekly.
So if the company wants to deal with our current plan did we get the wool pulled over our eyes and fall back into the cheaper plan for the company?
07-14-2021, 04:30 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2021
Posts: 446
This thread is about the recall of all three council 22 members.
There are plenty of other threads to talk about tiny pancakes, waffles and PSPP, etc.
The reason for this recall is they are not listening to the unwashed masses.
Do you really want people at the table who refuse to listen to your input?
YES or NO.
It is really that simple.
There are plenty of other threads to talk about tiny pancakes, waffles and PSPP, etc.
The reason for this recall is they are not listening to the unwashed masses.
Do you really want people at the table who refuse to listen to your input?
YES or NO.
It is really that simple.
07-14-2021, 05:42 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by BrianH
This thread is about the recall of all three council 22 members.
There are plenty of other threads to talk about tiny pancakes, waffles and PSPP, etc.
The reason for this recall is they are not listening to the unwashed masses.
Do you really want people at the table who refuse to listen to your input?
YES or NO.
It is really that simple.
There are plenty of other threads to talk about tiny pancakes, waffles and PSPP, etc.
The reason for this recall is they are not listening to the unwashed masses.
Do you really want people at the table who refuse to listen to your input?
YES or NO.
It is really that simple.
07-14-2021, 05:45 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 447
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
Judging by the traffic on this post maybe you should just run for office next time and if people support you then maybe you'll win.... Other than that we need to just support those that we voted for.
Elections have consequences. Some just aren't happy with the results so they feel the need to disrupt rather than unify.
07-15-2021, 06:14 AM
#19
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by BrianH
This thread is about the recall of all three council 22 members.
There are plenty of other threads to talk about tiny pancakes, waffles and PSPP, etc.
The reason for this recall is they are not listening to the unwashed masses.
Do you really want people at the table who refuse to listen to your input?
YES or NO.
It is really that simple.
There are plenty of other threads to talk about tiny pancakes, waffles and PSPP, etc.
The reason for this recall is they are not listening to the unwashed masses.
Do you really want people at the table who refuse to listen to your input?
YES or NO.
It is really that simple.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
