|
Originally Posted by DirtyPurple
(Post 3290702)
I was on that call, heard what PM said. Don’t want to rehash the specifics here in anonymous land. Sounds like a battle for sure, but overstating what was said to stoke political fire doesn’t make sense to me. I didn’t hear what you heard apparently, and that’s ok. I’m seriously invested (as we all are) in knowing the ground truth and making data-based decisions.
Frankly I’m glad he’s in the seat. When PM says the company is looking to gain efficiencies, what do you think that means. Who pays for those efficiencies? Do you think the company opened Section 1 or Section 7 to help us improve those sections? I think you are overstating what it means by the company is asking for concessions. Since this is your first go at contract negotiations here, maybe you should consider what is being said by those who have been around for two or three negotiations. |
Originally Posted by USMCFDX
(Post 3290709)
I heard him in a round about way saying he hears the anti pancake group and wishes we would be quiet as it ties his hands at the table. I hope this is true and the company hears it also and says "Why are you asking for pancakes if the crew force doesn't want it? Why are you wasting yours and our time?"
Frankly I wish he would resign also. Maybe if the MEC found a way to improve the A plan that was supported by 80-90% of the membership, they wouldn't feel like their hands were being tied. But, they are smarter than all of us and know better. They have the company just were they want them. :rolleyes: Taking odds now, if the next TA passes, what will it pass by? My guess is if the PSPP is there, and I think it will be, if it passes, it will be by 54% |
Originally Posted by pinseeker
(Post 3290737)
Maybe if the MEC found a way to improve the A plan that was supported by 80-90% of the membership, they wouldn't feel like their hands were being tied. But, they are smarter than all of us and know better. They have the company just were they want them. :rolleyes:
Taking odds now, if the next TA passes, what will it pass by? My guess is if the PSPP is there, and I think it will be, if it passes, it will be by 54% |
Wake up! Fly your line. Take your vacation. Don't fly sick.
|
Can MANGMNT legally try and poach more vacation sellers after the contractual method has been processed?
|
Originally Posted by MEMA300
(Post 3291314)
Can MANGMNT legally try and poach more vacation sellers after the contractual method has been processed?
I admit it could be someplace else. |
I thought the next step would be vaca canx which pays out more and or can be rescheduled. Honestly dont ever remember this happening before.
|
Originally Posted by MEMA300
(Post 3291341)
I thought the next step would be vaca canx which pays out more and or can be rescheduled. Honestly dont ever remember this happening before.
|
Originally Posted by MEMA300
(Post 3291314)
Can MANGMNT legally try and poach more vacation sellers after the contractual method has been processed?
|
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 3291320)
I can’t find anything in section 7 or 25 that specifies the timing and/or length of vacation buy back requests from the company.
I admit it could be someplace else.
Originally Posted by MEMA300
(Post 3291341)
I thought the next step would be vaca canx which pays out more and or can be rescheduled. Honestly dont ever remember this happening before.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands