Search

Notices

Rumors and Such

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2025 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 86
Default Rumors and Such

Rumored that Block 6 made a motion to remove NC Chair.

Supposedly motion has passed.
Reply
Old 09-29-2025 | 11:52 AM
  #2  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 51
Likes: 32
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Rumored that Block 6 made a motion to remove NC Chair.

Supposedly motion has passed.

Good

zzzz
Reply
Old 09-29-2025 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 7
Likes: 5
Default

OFF RAMPERS prevail!
Congratulations to the vindictive, company sympathizer IDIOTS among us.
Reply
Old 09-29-2025 | 01:21 PM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 171
Likes: 39
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Rumored that Block 6 made a motion to remove NC Chair.

Supposedly motion has passed.
Confirmed. Standby for TA2030...
Reply
Old 09-29-2025 | 05:09 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 494
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318
Confirmed. Standby for TA2030...
TA2029 with an almost 2% Amendable payback! Industry leading. Much leading. So industry. Wow.

Pat, get your suit on, we need you negotiate a concessionary contract!
Reply
Old 09-29-2025 | 07:21 PM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 116
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by acecrackshot
TA2029 with an almost 2% Amendable payback! Industry leading. Much leading. So industry. Wow.

Pat, get your suit on, we need you negotiate a concessionary contract!
He has a lovely 80’s tan blazer that pairs nicely with some penny loafers, and some nice kneepads for his meetings with the company.

More concession stands than Manhattan!
Reply
Old 09-29-2025 | 11:55 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 325
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Hungover
Good

zzzz

How does this get us a TA faster?

I thought removing an NC was a big deal the last time it occurred, how is this recent occurrence good? Or are they both good?
Reply
Old 09-30-2025 | 12:16 AM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Yuko
How does this get us a TA faster?

I thought removing an NC was a big deal the last time it occurred, how is this recent occurrence good? Or are they both good?
the lack of any accomplishment in negotiations over the last 18 months demands something change. Whatever JG has been doing isn’t working. Hopefully we find someone who won’t get us thrown out of room multiple times.
Reply
Old 09-30-2025 | 01:36 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 325
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by HooverPilot
the lack of any accomplishment in negotiations over the last 18 months demands something change. Whatever JG has been doing isn’t working. Hopefully we find someone who won’t get us thrown out of room multiple times.
So the gamble is new NC = faster ratifiable TA > JG’s ratifiable TA speed

Is this the assumption?
Reply
Old 09-30-2025 | 06:04 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 494
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Yuko
How does this get us a TA faster?

I thought removing an NC was a big deal the last time it occurred, how is this recent occurrence good? Or are they both good?
Well, you see, when WE remove the NC, its to get to a faster contract. Its not concessionary, see, its faster. The same blocks that were undercutting the NC are now in charge.

Lets see how they get this done.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices