![]() |
10-15 Year Lookback
Hello to all you FedEx pilots and congrats on your latest agreement passing (I think). I was hoping to pick some of your brains and learn a little more about your decisions that led you to FedEx. Just a couple disclaimers to start.
1.) I really don’t know a lot of about FedEx or its history at all, and in my pursuit of learning from you all about it, I apologize in advance if I make any wrongful assumptions. 2.) I came from the military when I transitioned to the airlines, so I have only been in the 121 world for a couple of years now, so my big picture outlook is narrower than many of yours. What I have heard from many of the FedEx pilots I’ve come across is that a number of years ago FedEx was the pinnacle of places to work. You’d see pilots leaving from all of the majors in pursuit of flying there. What I have also heard is that things have drastically changed. The overall sentiment I’ve heard now is “don’t come here unless you have no other options” and “the worst mistake I’ve made in my career is leaving X carrier for this” and even a number of pilots who have left the traditional majors, jumped to FedEx, and then jumped back a number of years later. While I’m sure some of these are exaggerated, I’m sure there’s some level of truth to these comments. This is what I’d like to try and collect some more info on. Right now at my company, things are good… really good. I’m not blind to the fact that things can change in a heart beat or with very little notice. My question to you all is what do you believe was the downfall that led to the sentiment shift? Could you see the writing on the wall early? What were the warning signs? What advice would you offer to a newer pilot to keep an eye out for in the future? Thank you for any shared insight! |
Do you like circadian swaps? Do you like management tools that fly a desk and yell at you to do better despite their total lack of competence to do so? Do you think you’d enjoy flying 3 legs per night on our equivalent of a regional jet while driving to and from Memphis AOC on a highway full of people that are actively trying to kill you?
|
Almost 30 years in this industry and I think this is as simple as I can make things based on my observations.
You want your company to be the gray man. Make a little money but don't do too well. You don't want it to be terrible and flirt with bankruptcy either. If the company is too well run and accrues a bunch of cash and equity (FDX, WN), the sharks on Wall Street will circle and come for the money at the expense of the company and the employees. If the company teeters on bankruptcy (US Air/TWA/Spirit) it is also a target. Whether for a cheap acquisition/merger or for the bigger airlines to kill and eliminate a competitor it doesn't usually end well. This scenario also introduces courts and regulator - neither of which will be helpful to the employees. If your company puts its head above the ridgeline in either fashion, that's when its time to worry. |
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 4035838)
Almost 30 years in this industry and I think this is as simple as I can make things based on my observations.
You want your company to be the gray man. Make a little money but don't do too well. You don't want it to be terrible and flirt with bankruptcy either. If the company is too well run and accrues a bunch of cash and equity (FDX, WN), the sharks on Wall Street will circle and come for the money at the expense of the company and the employees. If the company teeters on bankruptcy (US Air/TWA/Spirit) it is also a target. Whether for a cheap acquisition/merger or for the bigger airlines to kill and eliminate a competitor it doesn't usually end well. This scenario also introduces courts and regulator - neither of which will be helpful to the employees. If your company puts its head above the ridgeline in either fashion, that's when its time to worry. |
Originally Posted by Mickey
(Post 4035829)
Hello to all you FedEx pilots and congrats on your latest agreement passing (I think). I was hoping to pick some of your brains and learn a little more about your decisions that led you to FedEx. Just a couple disclaimers to start.
1.) I really don’t know a lot of about FedEx or its history at all, and in my pursuit of learning from you all about it, I apologize in advance if I make any wrongful assumptions. 2.) I came from the military when I transitioned to the airlines, so I have only been in the 121 world for a couple of years now, so my big picture outlook is narrower than many of yours. What I have heard from many of the FedEx pilots I’ve come across is that a number of years ago FedEx was the pinnacle of places to work. You’d see pilots leaving from all of the majors in pursuit of flying there. What I have also heard is that things have drastically changed. The overall sentiment I’ve heard now is “don’t come here unless you have no other options” and “the worst mistake I’ve made in my career is leaving X carrier for this” and even a number of pilots who have left the traditional majors, jumped to FedEx, and then jumped back a number of years later. While I’m sure some of these are exaggerated, I’m sure there’s some level of truth to these comments. This is what I’d like to try and collect some more info on. Right now at my company, things are good… really good. I’m not blind to the fact that things can change in a heart beat or with very little notice. My question to you all is what do you believe was the downfall that led to the sentiment shift? Could you see the writing on the wall early? What were the warning signs? What advice would you offer to a newer pilot to keep an eye out for in the future? Thank you for any shared insight! I'm a former mil guy that came straight to FDX in 2016 after leaving AD, so I understand where you're coming from. Why I came to FDX: At the time I was hired my rankings looked like 1-FDX, 2-DAL, 3-UAL, 4-AAL, then everybody else (UPS was only sporadically hiring). I came here because I had heard it was the place to be. I enjoyed the idea of not having to deal with pax, and liked the idea of a pension, and the fact that FDX had never furloughed. I had already interviewed at SWA and had a CJO when I interviewed here, and had interviews booked at DAL, UAL when I got the CJO here. Also liked the large number of widebody aircraft, and what looked like it was going to be a meteoric rise in seniority. Hows it going?: I lucked into a great situation. At the moment I'm one RCH below 50% seniority at the company, and about 100% seniority as a 77CA in my early 40's. I sit more than my fair share of reserve, but living in domicile makes it somewhat more palatable. Looking around the industry right now I dont think I'd be able to hold int'l WB CA at any of the other legacy airlines, but might hold it at UPS (single pay-rate makes senior equipment different...I think). Over the last 3 years I've thought more than once that I should have gone to DAL, but it looks like the new TA might finally bring us back to parity. So its going...ok. I don't care for our reserve rules, but there are good things here. What do we have thats good?:
What do we have thats bad?:
Should you come here?: If you're already established at a legacy airline, I think you'd be crazy to give up whatever seniority you have there to be the plug here. You would almost certainly be looking at 2-4 years of night hub turns, and MEM reserve. And the compelling reason in the past of no furloughs here vs. furloughs at legacies looks like it might be gone for good based on what we saw during COVID. There will be some movement here as we're due to retire ~1700 pilots in the next ten years. So I wouldn't come here unless you: a) Have some connection to MEM, ANC, or IND and desire to live in one of those places b) Don't have any other options c) Are a vampire who lives at night All that said, I recently flew with a guy was furloughed from AAL after 1 year (during COVID). At the height of our current TA drama he said he wouldn't go back to AA even if they offered to let him return to his previous seniority. Hope this helps. -Sled |
Originally Posted by Sled
(Post 4035908)
Mickey,
I'm a former mil guy that came straight to FDX in 2016 after leaving AD, so I understand where you're coming from. Why I came to FDX: At the time I was hired my rankings looked like 1-FDX, 2-DAL, 3-UAL, 4-AAL, then everybody else (UPS was only sporadically hiring). I came here because I had heard it was the place to be. I enjoyed the idea of not having to deal with pax, and liked the idea of a pension, and the fact that FDX had never furloughed. I had already interviewed at SWA and had a CJO when I interviewed here, and had interviews booked at DAL, UAL when I got the CJO here. Also liked the large number of widebody aircraft, and what looked like it was going to be a meteoric rise in seniority. Hows it going?: I lucked into a great situation. At the moment I'm one RCH below 50% seniority at the company, and about 100% seniority as a 77CA in my early 40's. I sit more than my fair share of reserve, but living in domicile makes it somewhat more palatable. Looking around the industry right now I dont think I'd be able to hold int'l WB CA at any of the other legacy airlines, but might hold it at UPS (single pay-rate makes senior equipment different...I think). Over the last 3 years I've thought more than once that I should have gone to DAL, but it looks like the new TA might finally bring us back to parity. So its going...ok. I don't care for our reserve rules, but there are good things here. What do we have thats good?:
What do we have thats bad?:
Should you come here?: If you're already established at a legacy airline, I think you'd be crazy to give up whatever seniority you have there to be the plug here. You would almost certainly be looking at 2-4 years of night hub turns, and MEM reserve. And the compelling reason in the past of no furloughs here vs. furloughs at legacies looks like it might be gone for good based on what we saw during COVID. There will be some movement here as we're due to retire ~1700 pilots in the next ten years. So I wouldn't come here unless you: a) Have some connection to MEM, ANC, or IND and desire to live in one of those places b) Don't have any other options c) Are a vampire who lives at night All that said, I recently flew with a guy was furloughed from AAL after 1 year (during COVID). At the height of our current TA drama he said he wouldn't go back to AA even if they offered to let him return to his previous seniority. Hope this helps. -Sled |
Originally Posted by Mickey
(Post 4035844)
That is a valuable perspective. Thank you. So FDX was making too much money that new management took over and smashed down the work group?
|
Originally Posted by swine
(Post 4035917)
California-based purple runway guy here. This info is all very helpful. You mention MEM IND and ANC… what about OAK? That is still a crew base right? Is it very senior? If I stuck around for flow this is the base I’d want but I don’t know much about it or if/when I’d be able to hold it as base.
If you want to fly for an airline and be California-based, FedEx is a very risky bet long term. |
Originally Posted by swine
(Post 4035917)
California-based purple runway guy here. This info is all very helpful. You mention MEM IND and ANC… what about OAK? That is still a crew base right? Is it very senior? If I stuck around for flow this is the base I’d want but I don’t know much about it or if/when I’d be able to hold it as base.
OAK will likely close (again) when the APAC 767 flying gets outsourced. |
Originally Posted by swine
(Post 4035917)
California-based purple runway guy here. This info is all very helpful. You mention MEM IND and ANC… what about OAK? That is still a crew base right? Is it very senior? If I stuck around for flow this is the base I’d want but I don’t know much about it or if/when I’d be able to hold it as base.
-Sled |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands