FDX Pilots Sue Alpa
07-25-2016, 07:36 AM
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Originally Posted by C17MooseDriver
That's why the lawsuit is going to court, to argue the point of fact and find out the truth.
I was initially against it also, but from reading the brief, I think they bring up a lot of legitimate questions that need to be answered and I doubt Alpa will answer them without being forced to
I was initially against it also, but from reading the brief, I think they bring up a lot of legitimate questions that need to be answered and I doubt Alpa will answer them without being forced to
or if only they'd read the SLB discussion-might've realized that no, not every single pilot would hit the buyback parameters
07-25-2016, 10:38 AM
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by ClutchCargo
"(d) ALPA intentionally or recklessly misrepresented the Sick Leave Buyback available to the FedEx pilots. Specifically, ALPA represented that the maximum Sick Leave Buyback would be available to all FedEx pilots, when in fact the maximum value was only available to a minority, and some FedEx pilots would be completely ineligible."
In regards to the above: Ever seen this document?
Attachment 2846
It clearly states that the most a NB Capt could receive is about $75K. All the way down to $0 for an NB F/O. This document was prominently posted on the ALPA MEC website well before the vote.
In regards to the above: Ever seen this document?
Attachment 2846
It clearly states that the most a NB Capt could receive is about $75K. All the way down to $0 for an NB F/O. This document was prominently posted on the ALPA MEC website well before the vote.
07-26-2016, 11:08 AM
#93
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by MaydayMark
Could Management hire trolls to correct (or induce) faulty online information?
Pro-Hillary PAC Spending $1 Million to Hire Online Trolls - Breitbart
Pro-Hillary PAC Spending $1 Million to Hire Online Trolls - Breitbart
07-27-2016, 06:30 AM
#94
Banned
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 62
Busdriver12,
There is additional evidence not listed in the Complaint which supports the allegations.
We are in the process of discovery with ALPA and exchanging documents. We've requested a large amount of information from ALPA which would not have been otherwise available to the pilot group.
There is additional evidence not listed in the Complaint which supports the allegations.
We are in the process of discovery with ALPA and exchanging documents. We've requested a large amount of information from ALPA which would not have been otherwise available to the pilot group.
Last edited by ClassActionALPA; 07-27-2016 at 07:15 AM.
07-27-2016, 07:14 AM
#95
Banned
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 62
CloudSailor,
I want to dispel the rumor that you state below. None of the 4 name plaintiffs sued the Company over 4.A.2.b.
To note, one of our MEC Chairman stated in a video that we later discovered that the Company was not over manned during 4.A.2.b (the Company had stated this as a reason for implementing 4.A.2.b)
I want to dispel the rumor that you state below. None of the 4 name plaintiffs sued the Company over 4.A.2.b.
Originally Posted by CloudSailor
ClassActionALPA,
Is it true that one of you 4 is suing (or sued) the company over 4a2b?
Is it true that one of you 4 is suing (or sued) the company over 4a2b?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
