FedEx Pilots v. ALPA - Class Certification
07-30-2016, 05:17 AM
#21
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 62
Originally Posted by Nitefrater
1)
Argue your case on it's merits, just don't try to "sell" it to the crew force as if they won't pay for it whether you win or not. After all, isn't just such a "sell job" a primary basis of your lawsuit?
OOOhhhhh, Irony!
Argue your case on it's merits, just don't try to "sell" it to the crew force as if they won't pay for it whether you win or not. After all, isn't just such a "sell job" a primary basis of your lawsuit?
OOOhhhhh, Irony!
We are arguing the case based on the merits, read the Complaint. We cannot release other evidence outside of what's in the complaint until discovery is finished.
We are not going to sit idle and let you or other individuals attempt to undermine this as a lawsuit "against them".
There's no "sell" here, but at least you do admit the TA was "sold" to the pilot group?
Last edited by ClassActionALPA; 07-30-2016 at 05:55 AM.
07-30-2016, 05:44 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,273
Originally Posted by ClassActionALPA
Nitefrater,
We are arguing the case based on the merits, read the Complaint. We cannot release other evidence outside of what's in the complaint until discovery is finished.
We are not going to sit idle and let you or other individuals attempt to undermine this as a lawsuit "against them".
There's no "sell" here, but at least you do admit the TA was "sold" to the pilot group.
We are arguing the case based on the merits, read the Complaint. We cannot release other evidence outside of what's in the complaint until discovery is finished.
We are not going to sit idle and let you or other individuals attempt to undermine this as a lawsuit "against them".
There's no "sell" here, but at least you do admit the TA was "sold" to the pilot group.
07-30-2016, 05:54 AM
#23
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 62
Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
He didn't say it was a "sell job." He said your lawsuit alleged a "sell job," which is exactly how I take your "sell job on this lawsuit.
There also is more evidence which has not be released.
07-30-2016, 07:04 AM
#24
gets every day off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Originally Posted by ClassActionALPA
There's no "sell" here, but at least you do admit the TA was "sold" to the pilot group?
07-30-2016, 07:12 AM
#25
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 62
Originally Posted by Nitefrater
This is the third time you've tried to put words into my mouth. The fact that I reference something you said (in this case the allegations of your lawsuit), does not mean that I said it, or agree with it.
There is more evidence that is not in the Complaint which ALPA is now receiving through discovery.
07-30-2016, 06:59 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Originally Posted by ClassActionALPA
Nitefater, do think the TA was "sold" to us by the NC? I state this as a question. There is a question mark in my previous post.
There is more evidence that is not in the Complaint which ALPA is now receiving through discovery.
There is more evidence that is not in the Complaint which ALPA is now receiving through discovery.
Since FedEx ALPA depleted their funds and national required an inspection of the books in order to get access to the war chest, yes, I think the direction from the new leadership was "get us a TA and sell it."
Do I have any proof that's what happened? No. But that's what I suspect happened as it makes sense to me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
