Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
CMPLX not reqd. for CFI-A or COM Practical >

CMPLX not reqd. for CFI-A or COM Practical

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

CMPLX not reqd. for CFI-A or COM Practical

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2018, 10:10 AM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 3
Default CMPLX not reqd. for CFI-A or COM Practical

For those pursuing a CFI-A or COM SEL rating, the FAA has recently decided that you will no longer need to provide a complex airplane for your practical exam. See the notice at the link provided. In other news, prices of complex airplanes just took a nosedive.

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/1033148
Rhodenhome is offline  
Old 04-25-2018, 02:14 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 352
Default

Originally Posted by Rhodenhome View Post
For those pursuing a CFI-A or COM SEL rating, the FAA has recently decided that you will no longer need to provide a complex airplane for your practical exam. See the notice at the link provided. In other news, prices of complex airplanes just took a nosedive.

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_poli...mentID/1033148
Indeed, just read it over. 10 hours of complex still required for the Commercial Initial, but that is it.
kingsnake2 is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 06:47 AM
  #3  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 8
Default

Does anyone know or want to contact the ACB to see if the Regs will eliminate the 10 hours of complex? This change allows greater flexibility but if you need to do 10 hours of complex training for the commercial, I’m not sure why a student would then want to get comfortable with the maneuvers in another type. After being proficient in the RG it only makes sense to do the checkride in that plane.
CAPILOTION is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 06:56 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

They're not getting rid of the complex time. They just did this to make it easier to schedule check rides, and cheaper.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 07:42 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 8
Default

I just don’t see how this reduces cost or makes things any easier.
For most people, 10 hours of complex training is more enough time to get ready for a commercial single. If someone wanted I guess they could do all the complex training and then do the checkride in a 152 which would save them about 50-100, but as an instructor I wouldn’t feel comfortable with that. They would need to do at least one flight to demonstrate proficiency which would cost them about $200. And from a scheduling standpoint, it’s harder to schedule a non complex plane since they are used for the private and instrument, whereas the complex is used exclusively for the commercial. The only benefit of this change is that someone with previous complex time could then do the training in a non complex. But they would have still spent the money on ten hours of complex so they aren’t saving anything.

I understand the reasoning behind this (complex trainers no longer being made), but all this appears to be missing something. The only logical follow though would be to remove the 10 hours complex.
CAPILOTION is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 08:23 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Default

Someone could get checked out in a complex and use it for cross countries like it was meant for. Far less hard landings and constant gear cycling should help with keeping existing airplanes in good shape.
IDIOTPILOT is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 09:12 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Default

A military pilot who wants a CFI would not have to rent a complex aircraft, and could do CFI training and checkride in a C152.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 10:04 AM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

They want you to have familiarity with gear and CS prop. But you don't need to become proficient in all the maneuvers and landings in a complex airplane. Saves money and wear and tear on the complex trainers.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 11:02 AM
  #9  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

How can you demonstrate proficiency in what you’re allowed to teach if you don’t bring a complex to your CFI checkride?
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 04-27-2018, 11:50 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
How can you demonstrate proficiency in what you’re allowed to teach if you don’t bring a complex to your CFI checkride?
You did that for the complex endorsement.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
6
12-07-2009 11:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices