Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
ATP or NEW Part 141 - Which is faster? >

ATP or NEW Part 141 - Which is faster?

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

ATP or NEW Part 141 - Which is faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2020, 06:58 PM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Position: Prospective Pilot
Posts: 5
Default ATP or NEW Part 141 - Which is faster?

Hi Folks,

After several discovery flights, I’ve decided to change careers at 30. My goal is to get from 0 TT to regionals as quickly and efficient as possible.

1. ATP is 1.5 hours away and has a proven program with steady flow of 50 students and 10 CFI’s. Guaranteed CFI job after grad.
2. VT - AAA Part 141 School just opened 5 minutes away. They are 5 months new, 10 students, 3 instructors and 3 brand new pipers, 1 new sentinel multi and 20 more pipers on the way this year. Owners are Buying the airport and forecasting huge student growth. Offer guaranteed CFI job after grad.

VT looks to be about $10k cheaper, but I’ve heard people getting caught up in the structure of a 141 program and not being able to progress as quickly as they’d like. Likewise, I’m concerned they wont have the student population to support the eventually need to build hours as a CFI. While the brand new planes and proximity to my home are appealing, I’m concerned in trusting a brand new school.

Any advice on how I should be objectively comparing the 2 programs?

Thanks!
MrMondays is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 07:10 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

1. ATP has a reputation as a meat grinder, seems like you'll probably do fine there if you're an aggressive self-starter. Other folks seem to get lost in the herd and end up with multiple career-altering check ride busts before they know what happened. May be a generational thing, I don't recall it being a problem 20 years ago.

2. The new school is very convenient for you. If their "vibe" seems good it might be worth taking a chance on their growth. Worst case you'll be able to get a job as a CFI somewhere regardless. Talk to some students, also find out which DPEs they use and research those. New airplanes bodes well IMO, hopefully more dispatch reliability. Also be aware that a "guaranteed CFI job" often means you hang out at the shop and then maybe get paid if any students turn up (or you recruit some students).

141 has the flexibility drawback but you should compare both programs based on:

a) Total cost of program.
b) Total flight hours during the program.

141 likes to brag about getting you done with less hours but then they charge you more so you can end graduating with more debt and fewer total hours from 141... but you still need 1500 hours for the airlines. Something to consider, ie total cost per flight hour acquired (assuming you get the same ratings from both schools).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 08:24 AM
  #3  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Default

do you want to fail a check ride?

or 141 with stage checks?

Not trying to get inside your head. But. You went on to a forum to ask random strangers on how you should spend 80,000 dollars. People who are typically successful at ATP have egos a few degrees north of LT. Pete Mitchell. They don't go on public forums and ask strangers what they should do.

Probably a sign you should avoid ATP
warm body is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 08:41 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post

141 likes to brag about getting you done with less hours but then they charge you more so you can end graduating with more debt and fewer total hours from 141... but you still need 1500 hours for the airlines. Something to consider, ie total cost per flight hour acquired (assuming you get the same ratings from both schools).
Shouldn’t that be “more debt and fewer hours total hours from 61”? But ATP is a part 141 school too so the OP's choice comes down to the more distant known quantity versus the closer upstart.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 09:59 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
Shouldn’t that be “more debt and fewer hours total hours from 61”? But ATP is a part 141 school too so the OP's choice comes down to the more distant known quantity versus the closer upstart.
ATP is part 61
Jeff90 is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 10:18 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
Default

I'd go with option 2. ATPs has a bad reputation for getting students thru with multiple failures. You will probably need to be proactive with getting on the schedule at the part 141 school to make sure you're progressing quickly.
viper548 is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 10:21 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
Shouldn’t that be “more debt and fewer hours total hours from 61”?
You'll finish your commercial at 120 hours in 141 compared to 250 for Part 61. I believe he's saying 141 schools charge more, therefore you'll end up paying more while ending up with fewer hours at the end going the 141 route.

141 schools don't hamper progression unless it's part of a university flight program that bases their flight schedule on a semester schedule and you don't fly over Christmas breaks, spring break, etc. Otherwise, fly your tail off and you'll still progress at the same rate as you would in a Part 61 environment.

My advice is to go to the local 141 school (you'll fly more frequently if it is nearby), then take your CFI certificate and instruct wherever you want. You want as little debt hanging over your head as possible when you get to the regionals.
35Right is offline  
Old 01-26-2020, 11:26 AM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
Shouldn’t that be “more debt and fewer hours total hours from 61”? But ATP is a part 141 school too so the OP's choice comes down to the more distant known quantity versus the closer upstart.
ATP may hold a 141 certificate (for veterans with the GI Bill). That doesn't mean all of their students do 141.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-27-2020, 08:11 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Subieguy14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 300
Default

I wouldn't touch ATP with a 10 foot pole anymore. They used to get you done and not be too bad. But now you pay 80k and finish in 9 months with 25 hours multi.... I payed 70k for 100 hours multi and finished in 6 months. Just something to consider. They gouge the students way too much and the quality of flying is lacking. Many students there have never touched a grass field or flown in actual IMC (me included) until I got my first real flying job.

I don't have an opinion on the other school since I never went there. But what I know about ATP now, I would never recommend them to anyone.
Subieguy14 is offline  
Old 01-27-2020, 08:13 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
ATP may hold a 141 certificate (for veterans with the GI Bill). That doesn't mean all of their students do 141.
Thanks for the info.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
13
10-03-2018 09:06 PM
Rimmie
Flight Schools and Training
1
01-11-2018 11:46 AM
pilotman46
Flight Schools and Training
3
10-31-2016 05:15 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
14
05-16-2013 07:16 AM
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
11
01-20-2009 05:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices