Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

IFR question

Old 12-13-2005, 09:44 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default IFR question

I occasionally read though interview gouges and there is one question that seems to appear in nearly all of them. They ask WWYD if on an approach and visibility is reported less than minimums and you are outside the FAF or if that happens and you are inside the FAF.

I have searched though my Jeppesen books and of course the FAR/AIM, but have had no luck finding the explanation. My only knowledge on the matter is that you cannot land if the current visibility is less than the prescribed minimum.
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 10:37 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laxrox43's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: A320/321 FO
Posts: 1,114
Default

Sounds about right to me. Just keep shooting the appch until you see the ALS. (Unless you have a CAT certified a/c?!) That is correct to the best of my knowledge. Sorry if this is very bland....

D
Laxrox43 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 10:45 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

I believe you cannot shoot the approach if Wx is below mins and you are outside the FAF, but if you are inside the FAF and Wx drops below mins, you can continue the approach (and land???)
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:06 PM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 24
Default

KiloAlpha: 121.651
clearedtoland is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:11 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

That explains why i couldn't find it in the regular FAR/AIM... to the FAR/FC I go. Thanks a million.
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:39 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laxrox43's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: A320/321 FO
Posts: 1,114
Default

haha...oh yeah...gee wizz...forgot about that reg hehehe...

Sorry my post wasn't much of a help KA

D
Laxrox43 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 01:10 PM
  #7  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
I believe you cannot shoot the approach if Wx is below mins and you are outside the FAF, but if you are inside the FAF and Wx drops below mins, you can continue the approach (and land???)
You can continue the approach if reported vis drops below minimums after you pass the FAF, but must discontinue it if drops below mins outside of the FAF. To land, you must have the required FLIGHT visibility (IE if you see the lights at decision height, you continue or you go missed). Doesn't matter what the tower/ATIS is reporting.

Remember too that in the 121 world, ONLY visibility is the limiting factor for flying the approach (IE if you have VV00 and 1/2SM, you can attempt a regular ILS, but if you have CLR and 1/4SM you can't fly the approach).

Of course these rules only apply to commerical ops (Part 91 can attempt the approach in 0/0)
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 02:24 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 185
Default

RVR is the ruling factor, if it is available.
dhc8fo is offline  
Old 12-18-2005, 06:17 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
p3pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: HC-130H A/C
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
You can continue the approach if reported vis drops below minimums after you pass the FAF, but must discontinue it if drops below mins outside of the FAF. To land, you must have the required FLIGHT visibility (IE if you see the lights at decision height, you continue or you go missed). Doesn't matter what the tower/ATIS is reporting.

Remember too that in the 121 world, ONLY visibility is the limiting factor for flying the approach (IE if you have VV00 and 1/2SM, you can attempt a regular ILS, but if you have CLR and 1/4SM you can't fly the approach).

Of course these rules only apply to commerical ops (Part 91 can attempt the approach in 0/0)
What do you mean part 91 can attempt the approach in 0/0? Also I'm in the military and want to know the differeneces to which the Part 91/121/135 etc pertain to.
thanks
Bill
p3pilot is offline  
Old 12-18-2005, 07:11 AM
  #10  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by p3pilot
What do you mean part 91 can attempt the approach in 0/0? Also I'm in the military and want to know the differeneces to which the Part 91/121/135 etc pertain to.
thanks
Bill
Part 135/121 flying (IE that flying that is for-hire commercial transport purposes: airlines/charter) is bound by a more strict set of regulations than Part 91 (private ownership) flying.

Since part 91 operators are not bound by FAA Operations Specifications, they can choose to attempt an approach, regardless of the weather conditions. That doesn't mean that they will be able to land, but they are welcome to give it a go under the FARs. If the ATIS is reporting Visibility less than 1/4sm and ceilings VV00, and the approach is a standard ILS (1/2 & 200), a part 91 flight can fly the approach down to minimums. If at DH (or MDA), they don't see the required items to continue (that whole list of things like approach lights, REILs, VASI, etc) they must execute a missed approach and figure out what to do.

Part 135/121 operators are bound by additional requirements. In order to attempt the approach, the visibility must be at least at minimums (or better) when the flight crosses the final approach fix. If they don't have the vis when they reach the FAF, they cannot continue the approach. If the vis drops after crossing the FAF, then they can continue to fly the approach down to minimums, at which point they must see the appropriate visual cues to continue, or they must go missed.

There are also some additional differences to part 91 flying (such as takeoff minimums). I think you'll find though that many professional flight departments incorporate the more strict rules into their operations procedures, even if they are part 91 operators.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
surreal1221
Pilot Health
32
11-14-2006 01:19 PM
MustangFa1con
Aviation Law
5
07-15-2006 05:08 AM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM
Cjp21
Major
6
02-28-2006 06:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices