Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Interesting email from ATP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2009, 06:14 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by ufgatorpilot View Post
Personally, I don't really feel like I have to "justify" anything to my peers.
Like I've said before, you may have to justify it to the guy interviewing you behind the desk. If you want to go buy some Citation time knock yourself out. But when someone does a Gulfstream type program in a required FO seat and pays for it, that's a whole different animal. Newbies and wannabes just need to be aware that there could be negative consequences as a result of trying short cuts. Then again, there may not be. It's all about if it's worth the risk and/or if you can look at yourself in the mirror.
Slice is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:15 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 456
Default

Originally Posted by fatmike69 View Post
I have been hearing this for over 10 years. So many retirements coming up, all the Vietnam Vets are retiring, there will be a huge pilot shortage, blah blah blah. I am still waiting to see it. I would bet that it will never happen, although I do hope I'm wrong. I will tell you one thing though, it won't matter how many retirements happen if the economy doesn't get fixed, or fuel prices go high. These are the two unknowns in my opinion. I will say this, the load factors on my flights right now are PATHETIC. I would say my average load factor for the past couple months is around 12 (30 seater). I don't see how profitability can be achieved with load factors like this. The only solution with such small demand? Consolidation and shrinkage. Not really what one wants to hear when hoping for a hiring boom. So.....if the economy becomes great and fuel stays low, I'd say there is a chance. But I wouldn't count on it.
That's because they are only 59 - 63ish now... =D
Dan64456 is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:17 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ufgatorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip View Post
Your profile (wants to fly a jet) says it all. If your idea of time building is just towing banners or doing turns about a point you're doing something wrong.
No comment.

Originally Posted by Pilotpip View Post
Please tell me one other industry where paying extra money to get something that is easily obtained for compensation once hired is looked at in a positive light?
Who cares as long as you are competent? Why are we so worried about how we are viewed?
ufgatorpilot is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:20 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ufgatorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Slice View Post
Like I've said before, you may have to justify it to the guy interviewing you behind the desk. If you want to go buy some Citation time knock yourself out. But when someone does a Gulfstream type program in a required FO seat and pays for it, that's a whole different animal. Newbies and wannabes just need to be aware that there could be negative consequences as a result of trying short cuts. Then again, there may not be. It's all about if it's worth the risk and/or if you can look at yourself in the mirror.
I think you missed my point. I just said, you should get the experience that you need. However you go about doing it is your business. I don't have money to buy Citation time or a Gulfstream type program, so don't think I'm advocating for these. But I'm not going to look down on a safe, competent pilot because they took the Gulfstream route.
ufgatorpilot is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:27 PM
  #45  
Super Moderator
 
Diver Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Tiki bar
Posts: 2,633
Default

Originally Posted by ufgatorpilot View Post
If I had the money to buy a few turbine hours, I think it would be a lot better experience than flying around VFR pulling a banner. That's just my opinion though. So long as you get the training and experience that you need, why does it matter where and how you get it? Instructing, flying jumpers, freight, etc are certainly not the only way to get experience... Personally, I don't really feel like I have to "justify" anything to my peers.
The problem with PFJ is that you are paying to do a JOB that would otherwise normally be a paid position. Myself and a lot of other guys are out on the street at many airlines right now and this issue kind of makes me sick.

I see a lot of similarities between PFJ folks and the guys that jumped ship from TSA to GoJets when they were first created, they were willing to do anything and everything to get ahead without thinking about the bigger picture or 'stabbing someone in the back'. It really makes me question the professionalism and integrity of the people that choose this route... and if I am ever a part of a hiring board in the future, I dont think I would be comfortable hiring an individual that participated in a PFJ program because of the perceived lack of professionalism and integrity that these programs create for themselves.... it's an ethics issue for me.

Imagine in 10 years when you are a crusty regional captain or a mainline FO and you get furloughed or your company goes out of business but other carriers are 'hiring' PFJ guys to sit in the right seat... you would be outraged.

So ya, Gulfstream and a few others have this 'program', but where does it stop? Thank God we have ALPA and other unions at most carriers to prevent this kind of stuff from going on... for now.
Diver Driver is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:33 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by ufgatorpilot View Post
Who cares as long as you are competent? Why are we so worried about how we are viewed?
That's just it. A fresh rating/type whatever doesn't make you competent. All it means is that you meet the minimum requirements to be sitting in that seat.

Would you feel safe knowing that the FO has 195 hours, zero actual and about 20 hours multi, and a captain with 1500 total, 100 hours in type and just off IOE?

Perfectly legal under the regulations, however most airlines won't allow this scenario and with good reason.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:41 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
F172Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: C172 Right Side
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by mshunter View Post
Ahhh the money debate again. I will not get into it, but again, I respectfully disagree. Working at an FBO, and haveing gone to ATP, I see both sides of the coin. The price usually comes out being preaty close, especially when you try to get it done as fast as ATP.
Well speaking from my own experience, I payed just over 15K for all my ratings. I studied alot on my own and had alotta help along the way, but 15K is way less then 50K ATP and DCA are quoting. Also with the quality of time thing. If you have a few hours of turbine experience I think its great, but I also think the kind of flying matters alot as well. Let me preface this by saying that im just a lowly CFI, I haven't made it to the jets....yet. But if I was going for an interview wouldn't it look better if I had a bunch of hard IFR time that was at a job possibly in a piston as opposed to paying for some turbine time? Also gatorpilot, im in gainesville going to uf, do you fly out of uac?
F172Driver is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:42 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"but it kinda irks me that you think that myself and others that went to ATP"

Sorry your irked...

I have no problem with ATP, per se, but I have a problem with going from PPL to CFI/MEI in 90 days and hopping right into teaching the next newb. I think one who does it that way has little chance to learn real world lessons and outside the box flying.

"I just wish that you would not look down on others or disuade others with erroneous information."

Other than being mistaken about how ATP is using the Djet's, I don't believe any of my information is erroneous. It's my opinion based on being a CFI since 1981, my experiences in flying and flight training over the years, and my personal experience with ATP training in the mid-80's.

Again, I'd like to mention that ATP marketing a turbine time building program as a direct entry into a regional airline market in this day and age is pretty sad. I'd not recommend going to ATP for this reason alone. At least get the CFI ratings and work for a time as a CFI. I'd highly recommend someone considering ATP take a tour of the location they will be attending and speak with CFI's and students at that location. Don't just believe everything you see at the website or hear from the call center.
de727ups is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:43 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ufgatorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip View Post
That's just it. A fresh rating/type whatever doesn't make you competent. All it means is that you meet the minimum requirements to be sitting in that seat.

Would you feel safe knowing that the FO has 195 hours, zero actual and about 20 hours multi, and a captain with 1500 total, 100 hours in type and just off IOE?

Perfectly legal under the regulations, however most airlines won't allow this scenario and with good reason.
There is no point in even engaging in a conversation with you since you continue to put words in my mouth. I never said any of these things. I never said a fresh rating/type makes you competent or that it's a good idea to have an FO with 195 hours etc etc.
ufgatorpilot is offline  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:54 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ufgatorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by F172Driver View Post
Also gatorpilot, im in gainesville going to uf, do you fly out of uac?
No, I graduated a couple of years ago and moved out of Gainesville. I am out in the real world now. Enjoy your time there and don't party too hard.
ufgatorpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LeoSV
Money Talk
2
12-10-2008 06:19 AM
schuhdil
Flight Schools and Training
14
12-01-2008 08:37 AM
Vandal
Military
27
10-07-2008 09:11 AM
blackser
Flight Schools and Training
4
09-26-2008 09:02 AM
whoareyou310
Flight Schools and Training
7
09-23-2008 10:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices