![]() |
Originally Posted by BeenThere
(Post 892179)
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...010/Gatlin.pdf
So there we have it. I've also talked to the HNL FSDO, their opinion is that if you are authorized by the Chief Flight Instructor you can in fact conduct sim training under 61 & 141, just like 135 & 121 ops. |
It looks to also be the Gatlin letter that NGDI posted earlier.
|
Originally Posted by BeenThere
(Post 892179)
So there we have it. I've also talked to the HNL FSDO, their opinion is that if you are authorized by the Chief Flight Instructor you can in fact conduct sim training under 61 & 141, just like 135 & 121 ops.
This opinion itself is reasonable, but their logic in arriving there looks weak. It's basically "This is the way I want it to be, it doesn't matter what the regs say". I'm guessing they won't try to go back and violate anybody who has done this in the past. |
We about beat this to death but I'd say the Chief Counsel's letter is straight forward:
1. Here is a list of what GIs can do. 2. Instructing in a sim is not on the list. 3. Therefore, a GI can not instruct in a sim. That Philosophy of Logic class finally paid off. |
A pilots license is not required to posses a GI certificate. Do you really think that someone without a pilots license is qualified to teach someone to fly. I don't care if it's a FTD or a TURD. 'm not buying it. A ground instructor is just that....a ground instructor. They can provide the required training to be signed off for taking a written test. Thats it.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 892142)
OK, looks like the FAA changed (or clarified) their position last month.
It was always a bit sketchy but IMO you could make a clear legal trail through the regs to reach the conclusion that it was authorized. That was probably never intended by the FAA, but probably just happened that way. Just a sampling of those that have had support for varying views but have finally been "clarified" by FAR changes, Chief Counsel interpretations or both in recent years:
Some parts of the FAA website are currently down but if you're interested, putting CFI or flight instructor in the search box at http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...terpretations/ should help you find all of them |
Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
(Post 893054)
[*]Ground instructor can't give loggable flight training in a device.
Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
(Post 893054)
[*]CFI-I with no aircraft instructor rating can't teach in any aircraft.
Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
(Post 893054)
[*]CFI-A without an Instrument-Airplane rating cannot provide instrument training beyond the "flight solely by reference to instruments" training for the private certificate.
Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
(Post 893054)
[*]CFI ride does not reset the FR clock.
Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
(Post 893054)
[*]CFIs may log trainee instrument approaches that occur in actual
|
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 892946)
A pilots license is not required to posses a GI certificate. Do you really think that someone without a pilots license is qualified to teach someone to fly. I don't care if it's a FTD or a TURD. 'm not buying it. A ground instructor is just that....a ground instructor. They can provide the required training to be signed off for taking a written test. Thats it.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 893335)
I have seen it done, essentially a BAI warm-up before the student goes to the airplane with a CFII. But I kind of agree it's not the best idea.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 893334)
Makes sense.
>>CFI-I with no aircraft instructor rating can't teach in any aircraft. Huh??? When did THAT happen? I trained several CFI initials back in the day...you're saying that they can no longer give flight instruction? http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/.../Grayson-2.pdf |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands