Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Flight Schools and Training (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/flight-schools-training/)
-   -   Flying DME Arc, lose DME, now what? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/flight-schools-training/56109-flying-dme-arc-lose-dme-now-what.html)

satpak77 01-13-2011 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by PFactor (Post 929611)
Required obstruction clearance (ROC) along the arc
depends on the approach segment. For an initial
approach segment, a ROC of 1,000 feet is required in
the primary area, which extends to 4 NM on either side
of the arc. For an intermediate segment primary area
the ROC is 500 feet. The initial and intermediate segment
secondary areas extend 2 NM from the primary
boundary area edge. The ROC starts at the primary
area boundary edge at 500 feet and tapers to zero feet at
the secondary area outer edge.

The total width of an arc intermediate
segment is 6 NM on each side of the arc. For obstacle
clearance purposes, this width is divided into a primary
and a secondary area. The primary area extends 4 NM
laterally on each side of the arc segment. The secondary
areas extend 2 NM laterally on each side of the primary area.

So let's say you're flying the arc at 150kts...2.5 miles/min. I'd say "dead reckoning" for a few moments to begin the climb and reconfigure is your best bet. Just figured it would be good to see the obstacle clearance figures. Although, I can't say what the obstacle clearance limits are in other parts of the world. Don't forget to check the approach chart for your highest obstacles in the area either!

Great info. I must admit that the original question is indeed one that made my mental gears turn. Sadly (my fault?) those gears are cobwebbed up and it takes these kinds of discussions to clear them up.

Realizing that may make no sense to the normal reader, what I mean is that these types of discussions are good to stimulate thought.

NoyGonnaDoIt 01-14-2011 12:07 PM


Originally Posted by Cubdriver (Post 929497)
The only problem I have with Noy's (sensible) solution is that a situation as common or possible as this one would seem to merit a specific procedure of some kind. Since aircraft performance would be known factor in this scenario, it seems like a company ops manual would address it. So at an interview I would give that as my primary response, and if the interviewer replies there is no company solution, THEN I would ask if we could get back to MSA and how fast we could get there.

Absolutely. Sometimes the best answer is a question that clarifies. Not all questions give all the information necessary to answer it.

rfaduka3 03-05-2011 08:24 AM

Lost DME on an Arc
 
Anyone have a textbook answer for what to do if you lose DME on an arc? e.g. how would one execute "the missed" on an arc?

f16jetmech 03-05-2011 09:16 AM

Assuming not in radar contact or on with atc, I would say climbing to msa, proceeding direct to the VOR and holding as published. Normally holds on arcs are over the VOR. Personally though, turn ten and twist ten and you will be fine. I'd keep shooting the arc in a real world situation. Not the textbook answer though

clipperskipper 03-05-2011 10:35 AM

We seem to use dme on the arc about once a week around here. The GNS530W now becomes your dme, continue with the approach.

forumname 03-05-2011 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by f16jetmech (Post 958495)
Assuming not in radar contact or on with atc, I would say climbing to msa, proceeding direct to the VOR and holding as published. Normally holds on arcs are over the VOR. Personally though, turn ten and twist ten and you will be fine. I'd keep shooting the arc in a real world situation. Not the textbook answer though

Assuming you are not on arc for very long and/or there isn't a strong crosswind.


Originally Posted by clipperskipper (Post 958530)
We seem to use dme on the arc about once a week around here. The GNS530W now becomes your dme, continue with the approach.

Works great, probably better than the turn 10 twist 10, especially if you can couple the LNAV/VNAV and have it loaded properly.

Unless you're company doesn't have it approved in their ops specs to shoot a DME ARC or your getting line check, etc.

Sure would suck to be in the hearing if you used your GPS to fly the approach AND something else went wrong, now you're trying to explain the CP/Feds why you did what you did.

clipperskipper 03-05-2011 03:03 PM


Originally Posted by forumname (Post 958593)
Assuming you are not on arc for very long and/or there isn't a strong crosswind.



Works great, probably better than the turn 10 twist 10, especially if you can couple the LNAV/VNAV and have it loaded properly.

Unless you're company doesn't have it approved in their ops specs to shoot a DME ARC or your getting line check, etc.

Sure would suck to be in the hearing if you used your GPS to fly the approach AND something else went wrong, now you're trying to explain the CP/Feds why you did what you did.

The Garmin 530W can be used freely as a DME substitute and as a substitute for ADF on ADF-required approaches. DME substitution also applies to precision approaches. RTM.

forumname 03-05-2011 03:59 PM


Originally Posted by clipperskipper (Post 958658)
The Garmin 530W can be used freely as a DME substitute and as a substitute for ADF on ADF-required approaches. DME substitution also applies to precision approaches. RTM.

With all due respect, I'm not sure you fully read the back half of my post.

For clarification purposes, does "RTM" stand for Read the manual?

In the part 91 world, that my acceptable. But if your operating at an air carrier, the Op Specs may not allow you use/substitute GPS data in the even of a conventional nav DEM failure. In which case, I'd say "RTOS"

Also, I'm not sure how using the GPS for distance info on ADF approaches applies to the topic at had. You know, what to do if you have a DME failure on a DME arc.

FlyerJosh 03-06-2011 06:03 PM


Originally Posted by forumname (Post 958682)
With all due respect, I'm not sure you fully read the back half of my post.

For clarification purposes, does "RTM" stand for Read the manual?

In the part 91 world, that my acceptable. But if your operating at an air carrier, the Op Specs may not allow you use/substitute GPS data in the even of a conventional nav DEM failure. In which case, I'd say "RTOS"

Also, I'm not sure how using the GPS for distance info on ADF approaches applies to the topic at had. You know, what to do if you have a DME failure on a DME arc.

If I have GPS, regardless of ops specs, I'm going to fly the arc utilizing whatever guidance I can, as I climb to the missed approach altitude and contact ATC.

Don't over think it and feel free to exercise command authority, but ALWAYS err towards the safer course of action. Nobody will question you if you take the safer path.

Even in a light GA aircraft, you should be able to climb from whatever circling altitude is assigned to the arc to the MSA or Missed Approach Altitude before you leave the confines of the protected arc just by taking a WAG at it.

forumname 03-07-2011 08:05 AM


Originally Posted by FlyerJosh (Post 959236)
If I have GPS, regardless of ops specs, I'm going to fly the arc utilizing whatever guidance I can, as I climb to the missed approach altitude and contact ATC.

Don't over think it and feel free to exercise command authority, but ALWAYS err towards the safer course of action. Nobody will question you if you take the safer path.

Even in a light GA aircraft, you should be able to climb from whatever circling altitude is assigned to the arc to the MSA or Missed Approach Altitude before you leave the confines of the protected arc just by taking a WAG at it.

I NEVER said I wouldn't use it if I had a failure and it the sole means of distance information.

I was simply responding to the poster that said he'd use it on the approach.

With all due respect, you didn't fully read the post either.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands