Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
$145/hr WET on twin Apache @ HLN...NO JOKE >

$145/hr WET on twin Apache @ HLN...NO JOKE

Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

$145/hr WET on twin Apache @ HLN...NO JOKE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2014, 05:26 PM
  #11  
Chopstick Grandmaster
Thread Starter
 
sealandair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 174
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes View Post
Self-insured or non-insured? These are two very different things...
LOL... what did I just say? I said "self-insured." NON-insured would be tantamount to business suicide, wouldn't it?
sealandair is offline  
Old 08-18-2014, 05:55 PM
  #12  
Chopstick Grandmaster
Thread Starter
 
sealandair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 174
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat View Post
A "twin Apache?" You mean the dreaded 4 engine version???
No, I meant that there are two identical aircraft, both with the same paint and the same registration numbers.

LOL... with all the smart-assed responses my OP has generated (albeit my terminologies being somewhat peculiar) , I'm starting to wonder if $145 an hour is a ****ty deal. My bad... shouldn't have posted.

Last edited by sealandair; 08-18-2014 at 06:16 PM.
sealandair is offline  
Old 08-18-2014, 08:59 PM
  #13  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat View Post
A "twin Apache?" You mean the dreaded 4 engine version???
They are actually joined at the hip!

(full disclosure: father of twins)
Timbo is offline  
Old 08-23-2014, 06:25 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by sealandair View Post
LOL... what did I just say? I said "self-insured." NON-insured would be tantamount to business suicide, wouldn't it?
Not really. I fly gliders and most commercial glider operators require that the RENTER show proof of liability and hull renter insurance
krudawg is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 05:29 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OnCenterline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 360
Default

If you don't have renter's insurance that specifically covers a twin, you're out of your mind, especially if the plane is as sketchy as it sounds. So, verify you have enough hull coverage to replace it, and that it covers a twin.

There are two downsides to this plane: it's in Montana, and the $1000 is only good for 7 hours. But....it's twin time. I can remember when I was starting out, everyone was looking for the flight school that had an Apache. It's a slow, antiquated plane, but it does the trick. Just don't try any fancy single-engine tricks in it.

Based on today's prices, this is a pretty good value....
OnCenterline is offline  
Old 11-10-2014, 08:37 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 806
Default

I'm heading to Vetter beginning of December to get my MEL and MEI with a buddy. I'm currently a CFII with 1000 tt but no MEL

Yes, if you put $1000 in the account they give you $1100 worth of flying. Here's what I found out from talking to the CFI over there:

1. They don't bill you for the ground sessions (included in hobbs time they say).
2. They don't fly the twin in any kind of IMC conditions.
3. They have an AI on staff....I asked him about the conditions of the twin - he said all works just fine except the rudder trim.
4. It runs on 87 low lead car gas.
5. It's an old twin.
6. They are very selective about who they allow to "time build" on the airplane. I told him specifically I was interested in time building on it with my friend, he said we'd figure it out once we got there. That was the only thing that was kind of odd to me.
7. Examiner charges $375 for the checkride ($600 here in SoCal).

But, $189/hour dual for a twin in 2014 is undeniably the best deal out there.

Imma hang there for 10 days with a buddy, we're both gonna get the MEL....I'll let you guys know how it goes...
Da40Pilot is offline  
Old 11-11-2014, 04:57 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: N/A
Posts: 578
Default

You might want to be cautious flying an airplane with a known mechanical problem (rudder trim), especially having posted that you knew of the problem prior to flying it.
Duckdude is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 08:22 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 806
Default

Originally Posted by Duckdude View Post
You might want to be cautious flying an airplane with a known mechanical problem (rudder trim), especially having posted that you knew of the problem prior to flying it.
I wouldn't call an inop rudder trim a mechanical problem. I've flown a few older 182s that had the placard.
Da40Pilot is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 10:49 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 726
Default

I would be very careful flying an airplane with an inoperative rudder trim. Just because it's placarded "inop" doesn't mean it's airworthy....
Flyhayes is offline  
Old 11-13-2014, 07:17 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
Default

not a bad rate, thank you for posting sealandair.
threeighteen is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices