Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Liability when not the PIC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:04 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 174
Default Liability when not the PIC

Say you're an ATP with thousands upon thousands of hours and plenty of ratings but have no recent experience in general aviation aircraft and no experience in the type of general aviation aircraft you're flying.

You go up flying with a 100hr private pilot (or even 300hr CFI) friend who is current and qualified in the airplane you're flying and is the PIC for the flight. Is there any situation in which you could be successfully violated or found liable, should something occur on the flight.

Such as the FAA violating you, saying you should've been able to prevent a runway incursion that happened.... or someone suing you saying you should've stopped them from revving the engine on the ramp and throwing a rock through their BMW's window.

I'd love to go up flying with some friends, purely as a passenger, but am not willing to risk my certificate over it.
encore is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 03:04 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

I like your thinking. If you search past enforcement cases, it has happened where the higher experienced, cetificated airman was violated, even though they was not acting as the "PIC" by whatever verbal agreement was made between the parties.

Definitely have Aviation Renter's insurance, AOPA Legal Plan, and an "umbrella policy" on top of your personal homeowner's insurance is not a bad idea either.

You could look into professional liability insurance if "freelance instructing" and/or setting up an LLC for your pilot services. Seeking good legal advice from an experienced aviation attorney like "Yoda2" is also advised.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 03:24 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by encore View Post
Say you're an ATP with thousands upon thousands of hours and plenty of ratings but have no recent experience in general aviation aircraft and no experience in the type of general aviation aircraft you're flying.
Based on lapsed currency required by FAR 61.57 (which is implied in your scenario), the ATP rated pilot would not be legal to act as PIC.

An FAA administrative law judge could possibly claim gross negligence or willful misconduct based on the ATP rated pilot's experience, however there's nothing in the FARs placing responsibility for that flight on the more experienced pilot.
awax is offline  
Old 12-19-2014, 05:45 AM
  #4  
OPS CHECK GOOD
 
TOGA9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: CA CRJ-200
Posts: 39
Default

There is history of the FAA going after the highest certificate in the airplane, even if not a required crewmember or PIC. Always depends on the situation, but I could see it happening.


Sent from my iPad using ACARS
TOGA9 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Career Questions
10
10-17-2011 01:23 PM
Duksrule
Regional
46
03-24-2011 02:49 PM
Underdog
Cargo
51
03-11-2011 11:56 AM
ebuhoner
Flight Schools and Training
35
10-10-2009 09:02 AM
paxhauler85
Corporate
29
07-08-2008 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices