Search
Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Air France 447

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2009, 06:49 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Packer Backer View Post
Unless you want to build an island in the middle of the Atlantic and put a radar antennae on it, no amount of upgraded equipment will account for the fact that the earth is round and radar is line of sight.
Ain't that the truth.

Didn't I read somewhere recently that the FAA wants to start switching over to more of a GPS-based ATC system instead of the current radar system?

That would be able to provide transoceanic coverage.
N118NW is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:00 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EXTW's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Up Front
Posts: 286
Default

Originally Posted by Bri85 View Post
Missing French jet hit thunderstorms over Atlantic - Yahoo! News


SAO PAULO, Brazil –

The head of investigation and accident prevention for Brazil's Civil Aeronautics Agency, Douglas Ferreira Machado, told Brazil's Globo TV that he believes the plane must have left Brazilian waters and could have been near the coast of Africa by the time contact was lost, based on the speed it was traveling.
I love the way Brazil is already trying to distance themselves.


EXTW
EXTW is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:21 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CTPILOT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Up front
Posts: 396
Default

My thoughts and prayers with the flight crew and passengers and their families. And I just told some family friends who are scared out of their minds of flying that turbulence does not make a plane go down
CTPILOT is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:29 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 747
Posts: 731
Default

http://img14.imagehosting.gr/out.php/i657265_a.jpg
olympic is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:30 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Packer Backer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by N118NW View Post
Ain't that the truth.

Didn't I read somewhere recently that the FAA wants to start switching over to more of a GPS-based ATC system instead of the current radar system?

That would be able to provide transoceanic coverage.
Not exactly. The GPS based ATC system would simply allow routes that are not based on ground based fixes. Overseas carriers have been doing this for years based on IRS or INS or GPS signals to navigate by. But there is no such thing as a GPS based radar. So some form of position reporting, either CPDLC or HF, will still be required.
Packer Backer is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:33 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Default

Originally Posted by Packer Backer View Post
Not exactly. The GPS based ATC system would simply allow routes that are not based on ground based fixes. Overseas carriers have been doing this for years based on IRS or INS or GPS signals to navigate by. But there is no such thing as a GPS based radar. So some form of position reporting, either CPDLC or HF, will still be required.
The GPS could be a two way system, constantly reporting it's position to a central computer. It can also listen to all of the other position reports from nearby aircraft. ADS-B
mynameisjim is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 07:45 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Talon1011's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Ex USAF, ex-ATA , currently Atlas Air 747 CA
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by CTPILOT View Post
And I just told some family friends who are scared out of their minds of flying that turbulence does not make a plane go down
To my knowledge Turbulence (CAT) has often caused damage but has never caused a hull loss. Thunderstorms, on the other hand, have caused a great many.
Talon1011 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:11 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Pharo351's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Packer Backer View Post
Unless you want to build an island in the middle of the Atlantic and put a radar antennae on it, no amount of upgraded equipment will account for the fact that the earth is round and radar is line of sight.
To quote the bionic man, "We have the technology" just not the will power or top secret clearence. And you don't need to build an island to get radar coverage over the atlantic. Think along the lines of skynet.
Pharo351 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:18 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 747
Posts: 731
Default

Did CNN just say this ???

CNN: "They do quite well if ditched by an experienced pilot as we've seen"

olympic is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:25 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 /FO
Posts: 345
Default

FAQ: ADS-B. Its not the problem solver, but is very much the step in the right direction. Requires a lot of money to implement so expect airline management to stall implementation and resist. But it won't cost so much to consider it "cost prohibitive" unless that company is on thin ice anyway.

It also a corner stone to FAA NextGen program.

About ADS-B

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...nce_broadcast/

I have gotten to fly with this equipment, its great.

Stop thinking "RADAR Coverage" start thinking GPS coverage.
SebastianDesoto is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tr disagree
Hangar Talk
1
06-26-2009 08:55 PM
andy171773
Major
56
06-22-2009 12:48 PM
HectorD
Hangar Talk
2
06-01-2009 07:57 AM
ol'tigerguy
Cargo
8
02-24-2009 03:29 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices