Leave Netjets?
06-27-2017, 08:37 PM
#253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: CL650
Posts: 238
Originally Posted by hkdguy
Leave Netjets for Southwest...
Easy decision for FO's. Much, much tougher choice for captain's...
Thanks for all the input.
hkdguy
Easy decision for FO's. Much, much tougher choice for captain's...
Thanks for all the input.
hkdguy
If SW continues to pay profit-sharing at present-day values indefinitely, If the FO has less than 11 years seniority at NJ, and If the FO is under the age of 44, then "Yes" it is an easy decision. (strictly from a "career-earnings" point of view)
Any variation of those three variables changes the math enough to where it's not so cut and dry....
Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
06-28-2017, 04:52 AM
#254
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 162
Originally Posted by jetlag7
Any variation of those three variables changes the math enough to where it's not so cut and dry....
06-28-2017, 11:42 AM
#257
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 162
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
I'll believe an age restriction when I see it.
Imagine the lawsuits? Even NJASAP has indicated they may try to prevent an age restriction (unfortunately).
Imagine the lawsuits? Even NJASAP has indicated they may try to prevent an age restriction (unfortunately).
06-28-2017, 01:29 PM
#258
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 493
Originally Posted by Nachomamma
Part 91k will have it. So they can't sue :-)
I don't doubt its being considered... but there will be a grandfather clause or some type of transition. If the Feds rewrite 121 to age 67, they will probably do everything in line with that.
But what do I know...
06-28-2017, 01:39 PM
#259
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 162
Originally Posted by G550Guy
If the FAA imposed a Part 91K retirement age, they would do it for Part 135 as well.
I don't doubt its being considered... but there will be a grandfather clause or some type of transition. If the Feds rewrite 121 to age 67, they will probably do everything in line with that.
But what do I know...
I don't doubt its being considered... but there will be a grandfather clause or some type of transition. If the Feds rewrite 121 to age 67, they will probably do everything in line with that.
But what do I know...
The days of grandpa flagrantly endangering lives because he's "just not ready to give this up yet" are rapidly coming to close. Good riddance.
06-28-2017, 01:40 PM
#260
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Originally Posted by Nachomamma
I don't disagree. But the idea is to 'mirror the industry'. If 121 is capped at age 65, so will 91k. If it moves up to 67, 91k will likely follow. This was the basis for the Exxon argument and that held up in court just fine. As for some type of transition, the shorter the better.
The days of grandpa flagrantly endangering lives because he's "just not ready to give this up yet" are rapidly coming to close. Good riddance.
The days of grandpa flagrantly endangering lives because he's "just not ready to give this up yet" are rapidly coming to close. Good riddance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
