NetJets: Potential Age 65 and Company LOM Pla
03-19-2018, 03:24 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,916
They should at least make it full SS retirement age. In my case I'd have to wait 16 months from age 65 retirement to starting my SS unless I wanted to take the hit for early withdrawal. Many younger pilots have to wait until age 67, which is what I suspect the 121 world will be going to in the future.
My medical LOA wasn't mandatory, I could have kept on flying at the cost of damaging my long term health. When I did the math figuring an age 65 retirement I came out ahead being out on Medical for 3 years then collecting the Harvey Watt policy until age 68.
My medical LOA wasn't mandatory, I could have kept on flying at the cost of damaging my long term health. When I did the math figuring an age 65 retirement I came out ahead being out on Medical for 3 years then collecting the Harvey Watt policy until age 68.
03-19-2018, 03:25 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
[QUOTE=Jetlife;2554296]
Cute, might want to work on learning how to change a quote before you try and razz somebody. Day 6 of 7 fatigue must have gotten to you.
Oh I screwed it up while safe at home with my familia, you are still the angry,angry young man, it’s cute.
Originally Posted by 727C47
Cute, might want to work on learning how to change a quote before you try and razz somebody. Day 6 of 7 fatigue must have gotten to you.
03-19-2018, 03:28 PM
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
[QUOTE=727C47;2554300]
Oh I screwed it up while safe at home with my familia, you are still the angry,angry young man, it’s cute.
Missed the mark again.
Angry? My comment literally had NOTHING to do with NJA. Your comment is incorrect, 70 is not a compromise when you look at 121 industry averages.
Originally Posted by Jetlife
Oh I screwed it up while safe at home with my familia, you are still the angry,angry young man, it’s cute.
Angry? My comment literally had NOTHING to do with NJA. Your comment is incorrect, 70 is not a compromise when you look at 121 industry averages.
03-19-2018, 03:28 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Originally Posted by AirBear
They should at least make it full SS retirement age. In my case I'd have to wait 16 months from age 65 retirement to starting my SS unless I wanted to take the hit for early withdrawal. Many younger pilots have to wait until age 67, which is what I suspect the 121 world will be going to in the future.
My medical LOA wasn't mandatory, I could have kept on flying at the cost of damaging my long term health. When I did the math figuring an age 65 retirement I came out ahead being out on Medical for 3 years then collecting the Harvey Watt policy until age 68.
My medical LOA wasn't mandatory, I could have kept on flying at the cost of damaging my long term health. When I did the math figuring an age 65 retirement I came out ahead being out on Medical for 3 years then collecting the Harvey Watt policy until age 68.
03-19-2018, 03:37 PM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
[QUOTE=Jetlife;2554304][QUOTE=727C47;2554300]
Missed the mark again.
Angry? My comment literally had NOTHING to do with NJA. Your comment is incorrect, 70 is not a compromise when you look at 121 industry averages.[/QUOTE
Dude, this is an open forum, anyone ,and everyone can give an opinion, I just find it comical to see you on any and all NJA threads more than NJA pilots, usually negative, comically so. Netjets has a lot of issues right now, it’s not competitive compensation wise with the 121 world, same ,same QOL , it’s a shame, and guys, and girls are bailing ,even senior captains are voting with their feet, I’m not here to defend it, I do want to see the elder statesmen get a fair shake, and from what I’ve been reading and hearing it is trending that way . Good. I could care less about 121 industry averages, if I ever return to 121 I will care, but even then I want these guys to get an equitable ending to their careers.
Missed the mark again.
Angry? My comment literally had NOTHING to do with NJA. Your comment is incorrect, 70 is not a compromise when you look at 121 industry averages.[/QUOTE
Dude, this is an open forum, anyone ,and everyone can give an opinion, I just find it comical to see you on any and all NJA threads more than NJA pilots, usually negative, comically so. Netjets has a lot of issues right now, it’s not competitive compensation wise with the 121 world, same ,same QOL , it’s a shame, and guys, and girls are bailing ,even senior captains are voting with their feet, I’m not here to defend it, I do want to see the elder statesmen get a fair shake, and from what I’ve been reading and hearing it is trending that way . Good. I could care less about 121 industry averages, if I ever return to 121 I will care, but even then I want these guys to get an equitable ending to their careers.
