Netjets Increasing Hiring Part Duex..
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FE, FO, CAPT.
Posts: 200
I just did recurrent. We did CRM training at the end of day 2, so they combined us with the current new-hire class of about 20. Just about half the new-hires had retired from major airlines (Delta, AA and United) at age 65. I suspect that will skew the "average flight time" numbers since I suspect those guys have over 20,000 hours.
NetJets is a good deal for those who wish to continue flying after 121 retirement. Retirees who have no aspirations to upgrade are a good deal for NetJets.
NetJets is a good deal for those who wish to continue flying after 121 retirement. Retirees who have no aspirations to upgrade are a good deal for NetJets.
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 378
I just did recurrent. We did CRM training at the end of day 2, so they combined us with the current new-hire class of about 20. Just about half the new-hires had retired from major airlines (Delta, AA and United) at age 65. I suspect that will skew the "average flight time" numbers since I suspect those guys have over 20,000 hours.
NetJets is a good deal for those who wish to continue flying after 121 retirement. Retirees who have no aspirations to upgrade are a good deal for NetJets.
NetJets is a good deal for those who wish to continue flying after 121 retirement. Retirees who have no aspirations to upgrade are a good deal for NetJets.
I counted 5 of 20 over 65.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
I just did recurrent. We did CRM training at the end of day 2, so they combined us with the current new-hire class of about 20. Just about half the new-hires had retired from major airlines (Delta, AA and United) at age 65. I suspect that will skew the "average flight time" numbers since I suspect those guys have over 20,000 hours.
NetJets is a good deal for those who wish to continue flying after 121 retirement. Retirees who have no aspirations to upgrade are a good deal for NetJets.
NetJets is a good deal for those who wish to continue flying after 121 retirement. Retirees who have no aspirations to upgrade are a good deal for NetJets.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
I can't imagine how many extended days you'd have to pick up to hit that mark on anything less than about year 8 on the CC76 schedule.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 151
[QUOTE=mooneymite;2680200]I just did recurrent. We did CRM training at the end of day 2, so they combined us with the current new-hire class of about 20. Just about half the new-hires had retired from major airlines (Delta, AA and United) at age 65. I suspect that will skew the "average flight time" numbers since I suspect those guys have over 20,000 hours.
How may ex-wives does someone need to have to continue to work after 65?!? That’s just crazy.
How may ex-wives does someone need to have to continue to work after 65?!? That’s just crazy.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 224
Maybe by year 10 you can sniff those numbers. So glad they dumped the >40k payscale for FOs.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
So what is realistic on the 76 day schedule? They were saying they expect upgrade time to drop dramatically in next two years???
#39
The 76-day is a soul-sucking schedule that you're not going to want to be on very long. You'll work as many as 21 days some months. But if you're a first-year guy on it, you can maybe plan $87-88K. (I typically got around 8% more than base salary in "soft money" [overtime, holiday pay, etc.].) There's no way on earth an FO will come anywhere close to $130K in his first few years.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post