NetJets new Contract
#361
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
Just saying, if you live near a base I think a major is a good job, if you gotta commute to a crash pad it sucks! Commuting is the only part of working at a major I couldn't stand and my wife makes more than me so moving is not an option, plus my Country Club initiation is paid off, going to be good to finally be able to use it on my 7 days off.
#362
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,701
If you call in fatigued just to have time to use your meal deviation, you’ll probably get fired.
#363
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 443
Just saying, if you live near a base I think a major is a good job, if you gotta commute to a crash pad it sucks! Commuting is the only part of working at a major I couldn't stand and my wife makes more than me so moving is not an option, plus my Country Club initiation is paid off, going to be good to finally be able to use it on my 7 days off.
#364
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
Yea if you want 7 days off in a row consistently, you’ll never get that at a major. Not considering reserve, even with a commute, you’ll work around the same amount of days off than you would on the 7/7, and several days more than the CC76, and make more doing it. I totally get the added stress of commuting and all that but commuter clauses at all the airlines it’s really not that big of a deal unless you gotta do a 2-3 leg because you live in nowheresville. To each their own, that’s for sure.
#365
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 40
This is the root problem I think with NetJets pilots. It’s the attitude that most pilots here will settle for less so they will always be behind in terms of the going rate for an ATP rated pilot. It’s truly sad because NetJets pilots deserve better and so much more. It’s a unique job and it demands better pay due to the quirks of the business. We wish you guys and gals all the best.
#366
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
It's important to remember that in my 50 years we have been here at the Majors 5 times with decent pay and living the good old life only to see it collapse time and time again. Deregulation in 1980, late 1980's when Lorenzo reared his ugly head was probably the worst and change the industry forever, ending Pilot Partnership with Management to "glorified bus drivers" (Lorenzo's own words). Then in mid-90's, 9/11 and 2008. Glad to see everyone doing well but were all one recession or plane into a building for it all to crash down again. Save your money and always always have a plan B!
#367
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 443
It's important to remember that in my 50 years we have been here at the Majors 5 times with decent pay and living the good old life only to see it collapse time and time again. Deregulation in 1980, late 1980's when Lorenzo reared his ugly head was probably the worst and change the industry forever, ending Pilot Partnership with Management to "glorified bus drivers" (Lorenzo's own words). Then in mid-90's, 9/11 and 2008. Glad to see everyone doing well but were all one recession or plane into a building for it all to crash down again. Save your money and always always have a plan B!
#368
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,701
Well said. Nobody is immune to the next recession. The ONLY saving grace is age 65. The amount of attrition at the top could easily translate into furloughing at the top. Outlook wise, the airline industry is in a very good spot. There will be a bit more consolidation but look at how many airlines have been absorbed in the last 10-15 years. Dozens of airlines are gone and or merged but the demand for flying is high and growing, and everyone is at capacity. But it is all good until it isn't.
60 was certainly too young. 65 might even be too young given the advances in fitness, nutrition, and medical technology. 67 seems about right.
But the people that apologize for NetJets missing the mark on contract improvements are frequently the same people who claim mandatory retirement is “arbitrary.” What is no longer “arbitrary?” 78? 91? 103?
#369
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 443
Another area where Part 121 is light years ahead of us. In what parallel universe is it a good idea to have 75 year old chowderheads flying customers for hire?
60 was certainly too young. 65 might even be too young given the advances in fitness, nutrition, and medical technology. 67 seems about right.
But the people that apologize for NetJets missing the mark on contract improvements are frequently the same people who claim mandatory retirement is “arbitrary.” What is no longer “arbitrary?” 78? 91? 103?
60 was certainly too young. 65 might even be too young given the advances in fitness, nutrition, and medical technology. 67 seems about right.
But the people that apologize for NetJets missing the mark on contract improvements are frequently the same people who claim mandatory retirement is “arbitrary.” What is no longer “arbitrary?” 78? 91? 103?
I have yet, in 2 years at my airline, to fly with somebody that shouldn’t be in that seat. Where at NJA probably 2 out of 10 captains shouldn’t have been captains.
Few things in the airline world are arbitrary. 117 is a great example of that. 65 didn’t come out of thin air, and 67 is certainly something I expect to see in my future.
NJA is a large holdout of guys who were in financial ruin and some wont ever recover. It’s not surprising that they are fighting the hardest for no retirement, their only option is to work until they die because they didn’t plan.
#370
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post