Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Fractional
GAMA / WHEELS UP - Current Pilot Experiences >

GAMA / WHEELS UP - Current Pilot Experiences

Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

GAMA / WHEELS UP - Current Pilot Experiences

Old 05-24-2019, 08:30 AM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Das Auto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by 1212135 View Post
This won’t end will it? I gave you the FAA statement. Because you believe something doesn’t make it the law of the land. You sound like a dam leftist liberal. It’s not your way so you run around screaming “ iMorally it’s wrong”. You call the FAA.gov website fake. Are you even a real pilot or AOC?? I thought it was left as a 135 interpretation for ABC 135 carriers for insurability not mainline. Your ignorance of rules even when present black and white evidence you still can’t let it go.
Screaming? Leftist liberal? What a ridiculous statement. Calm down. The FAA statement is not "fake" either. The letter you gave referenced a 121 carrier where the F.O. was flying with a company check airman. Completely irrelevant.

Don't get all butt hurt with me because you've been filling out your logbook wrong all these years, and yes I am a real pilot. Check Airman in fact. I hope to conduct your next 293 or 299 ride.
Das Auto is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 08:34 AM
  #242  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Das Auto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by 1212135 View Post
Hey join there regional affiliate -problem fixed!!
Some Mainline carriers sold there golden ticket to mainline out in exchange for cheap regional labor.

I know one guy that blew his AA interview and thanks to PSA little flow thru. He works at AA. So YOU ARE WRONG!

Incase you missed it.. YOU ARE WRONG!
Did he blow his interview for falsifying his log book?

Thought not.

Get some anger management counseling. Its becoming obvious why you're career didn't go further than flying for a regional airline, then a King Air.
Das Auto is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 08:38 AM
  #243  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Das Auto View Post
Screaming? Leftist liberal? What a ridiculous statement. Calm down. The FAA statement is not "fake" either. The letter you gave referenced a 121 carrier where the F.O. was flying with a company check airman. Completely irrelevant.

Don't get all butt hurt with me because you've been filling out your logbook wrong all these years, and yes I am a real pilot. Check Airman in fact. I hope to conduct your next 293 or 299 ride.
So as a check airman you have a letter stating if they are type rated they can log PIC if sole manipulator of controls written by FAA lawyers. And you disregard it and then threaten pilots using your status to believe you or suffer a checkride failure is a pretty bold statement on a public forum to suggest.
1212135 is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 08:38 AM
  #244  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by 1212135 View Post
Survey Say: Your full of S$&T
Actually, the survey says you can't read for comprehension. Obviously a product of American public education. What I said (pay attention now) was that if you got caught lying on a MAJOR airline interview, you weren't going to get called for a second interview at that airline.

Since flow through pilots don't go through the same HR hiring process its not impossible they could slip through.

Do yourself a favor. Hit the library and check out some Bill Peet books.
Packrat is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 08:49 AM
  #245  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Das Auto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by 1212135 View Post
So as a check airman you have a letter stating if they are type rated they can log PIC if sole manipulator of controls written by FAA lawyers. And you disregard it and then threaten pilots using your status to believe you or suffer a checkride failure is a pretty bold statement on a public forum to suggest.
I threatened no such thing and I have not seen the "letter" you are talking about in any of our company manuals.

Please feel free to forward this Gama specific document, or failing that, have our POI publish said document so we can circulate it amongst the training department.

I won't hold my breath.
Das Auto is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 09:00 AM
  #246  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Das Auto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet View Post
This is the worst advise. Ever. Pilot in Command means the guy in COMMAND. That would be the Captain or Aircraft Commander. Now, if you want to keep track of your 'sole manipulator' time for ARGUS then have at it. Just know that if you ever try to go to anything larger than a King Air for WU you'll be laughed out of the interview with your First Officer 'PIC' time.
Exactly right. Log it separately.
Das Auto is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 03:21 PM
  #247  
Line Holder
 
tohellandback's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 27
Default

Can anyone confirm if the interview sim evaluation is conducted in a B1900?

Also, is Gama hiring because of the expansion of the business, or because of pilots leaving? Thanks.
tohellandback is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 04:07 PM
  #248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Das Auto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by tohellandback View Post
Can anyone confirm if the interview sim evaluation is conducted in a B1900?

Also, is Gama hiring because of the expansion of the business, or because of pilots leaving? Thanks.
They're hiring for both reasons. More aircraft coming online, King Air guys moving over the to XL & the Citation ten, and guys moving on to bigger and better things in general.

There is no sim evaluation anymore. They used to do them in some variation of the King Air but not anymore.
Das Auto is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 10:57 AM
  #249  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,215
Default

Just for reference:
Did my flight training for both FAA and JAA. When I started logging time in the EU in 2000, I was able to log my first 500hrs SIC, and the first 500hrs SIC with MTOGW over 20K Kgs, and 50% of other SIC time as PIC time towards my required 1500hrs PIC for the purpose of unfreezing my ATPL. I also had to log the Out/In times and the name of the PIC for every leg. Needless to say I rewrote all my logbooks, except the one for my primary training when I came over to the states, logging everything in the right seat until EU upgrade OE was finished as SIC.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 01:35 PM
  #250  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by 1212135 View Post
Part135 general opsec (EOD, Alternate requirements, takeoff minimum etc. nothing to brain busting).. FaceTime:Skype interview only. Chief Pilot makes determination on DEC slots. It’s more or less do you meet insurance minimum for DEC.
Any systems questions on previous aircraft flown?
mdiepenbroek is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lvflying
Corporate
72
10-26-2018 05:02 PM
Guard
Fractional
85
10-24-2018 04:54 PM
MAWK90
Cargo
245
03-07-2011 06:54 AM
POPA
Regional
39
09-27-2007 09:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices