121 PIC vs FAA PIC
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: e145 fo
Posts: 250
I take it you were not a Ca at your 121 carrier? All time should be listed as Sic. Your pria will show that you never completed an upgrade. Better to have the most honest resume possible.
#12
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 272
You’re not a pilot in command unless you’re signing for the plane. Your the pilot flying when you’re manipulating the controls. Sounds like you better stay at your 121 job if you have any plans to go else where. But if you don’t know the difference w flight times you asked about...good luck in your career. lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#13
You know the difference.
There is a difference.
You will have more than 1 resume.
Not all resumes are the same.
Know the requirements for the job you are applying for and prepare your resume accordingly.
There is a difference.
You will have more than 1 resume.
Not all resumes are the same.
Know the requirements for the job you are applying for and prepare your resume accordingly.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Phenom driver
Posts: 147
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 162
Life is full of these arguments. Error on the side of caution. I was a former Naval man myself and a good argument at the VFW always come up- “what is a veteran”
Some argue only those who have deployed have earned that title.
Some say if you deployed and or served 20 years and have official retirement is the only way to earn that title.
Some argue if you have ever served in the armed forces you obtained that title.
Some argue only those who have deployed have earned that title.
Some say if you deployed and or served 20 years and have official retirement is the only way to earn that title.
Some argue if you have ever served in the armed forces you obtained that title.
#16
This is exactly correct. Employers will not like sole man. time represented as PIC. Unless the employer is actually the FAA (and maybe other federal agencies?).
#17
Life is full of these arguments. Error on the side of caution. I was a former Naval man myself and a good argument at the VFW always come up- “what is a veteran”
Some argue only those who have deployed have earned that title.
Some say if you deployed and or served 20 years and have official retirement is the only way to earn that title.
Some argue if you have ever served in the armed forces you obtained that title.
Some argue only those who have deployed have earned that title.
Some say if you deployed and or served 20 years and have official retirement is the only way to earn that title.
Some argue if you have ever served in the armed forces you obtained that title.
VFW may only accept members who served in a combat zone, etc. But that doesn't define what a veteran is.
#18
That last is the official federal government/VA definition, and that's the one that counts for benefits Served on active duty for a certain amount of time, and it's a relatively short amount of time (or discharged for injury). Reserve/guard are not veterans unless they serve on AD federal orders for a certain amount of time. Possible to retire from the guard and not be a vet (hard to do in the reserves, because it will be hard to dodge mobs for 20 years).
VFW may only accept members who served in a combat zone, etc. But that doesn't define what a veteran is.
VFW may only accept members who served in a combat zone, etc. But that doesn't define what a veteran is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bellanca
Flight Schools and Training
32
02-26-2011 02:18 PM