Shortage of Pilots - Impact on Part 91/135 Op
#11
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
#14
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,454
Very EU-centric article where pay for charter/corporate is very low by comparison to the US and operators have typically been pretty casual about crews. In the US, pay for experienced pilots has risen dramatically which has put pressure on bottom-feeding 135 operators. I’ve seen charter operators with 900 hour jet F/Os.
GF
GF
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,261
What would you point to that makes it slanted?
A world wide recession would probably minimize some of the shortfall...less demand but the aging of the pilot fleet will continue regardless of recessions or not.
Would a lessening of demand of pilots for new planes, retiring pilots at 121 operations match the reduction in pilots positions that would result in a recession?
Hard to say but some lessening of the demand for pilots would occur.
If there are other variables they left out I'd be interested to hear your view.
I think they simply took some numbers/projections from companies that are in the know for what is being bought/sold/retired from their airline/Part 135 customers.
As far as indicators the shortage is occurring:
Some Part 135 ops are offering "part-time" positions for pilots, one rotation a month versus the standard 2...that wouldn't be happening unless normal schedules weren't enough of a lure to get pilots to be "semi-retired"
The first signs of a shortage are the recent (18-24 months) of increase in regional pay + bonuses. If there wasn't a shortage regional FOs would still be making sub $20K salary and they aren't.
SWA, Delta, JB are setting up aviation tracks for zero to hero flight training...never been done before in the US.
Regionals asking for and getting relief on the 1500 ATP hr rules.
Past 9 yrs seat capacity has been reduced on RJs by 4.5%.
Mainline has increased 14.5%
It won't happen overnight but regionals will feel it first as evidenced above and that means the Part 135/91 folks will be feeling it also.
The only relief valve for these two groups are the increased pool of retired 121 drivers...that is if you can entice them with enough money to lure them from the golf course, fishing pond, i.e. part-time jobs.
Just my $.02
A world wide recession would probably minimize some of the shortfall...less demand but the aging of the pilot fleet will continue regardless of recessions or not.
Would a lessening of demand of pilots for new planes, retiring pilots at 121 operations match the reduction in pilots positions that would result in a recession?
Hard to say but some lessening of the demand for pilots would occur.
If there are other variables they left out I'd be interested to hear your view.
I think they simply took some numbers/projections from companies that are in the know for what is being bought/sold/retired from their airline/Part 135 customers.
As far as indicators the shortage is occurring:
Some Part 135 ops are offering "part-time" positions for pilots, one rotation a month versus the standard 2...that wouldn't be happening unless normal schedules weren't enough of a lure to get pilots to be "semi-retired"
The first signs of a shortage are the recent (18-24 months) of increase in regional pay + bonuses. If there wasn't a shortage regional FOs would still be making sub $20K salary and they aren't.
SWA, Delta, JB are setting up aviation tracks for zero to hero flight training...never been done before in the US.
Regionals asking for and getting relief on the 1500 ATP hr rules.
Past 9 yrs seat capacity has been reduced on RJs by 4.5%.
Mainline has increased 14.5%
It won't happen overnight but regionals will feel it first as evidenced above and that means the Part 135/91 folks will be feeling it also.
The only relief valve for these two groups are the increased pool of retired 121 drivers...that is if you can entice them with enough money to lure them from the golf course, fishing pond, i.e. part-time jobs.
Just my $.02
#17
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 62
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 664
I think the shrinking pilot supply and the corresponding upward pressure on pilot compensation will utterly decimate a significant portion of small corporate/135 flying. The economics of small turbine aircraft just won't work very well with these new market realities.
#20
XOJET Citation X
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DO, Baker Aviation, Citation X
Posts: 316
I believe Ty and you are correct. From the GoJet website that says:
MILITARY PILOTS HIRING REQUIREMENTS
FAA commercial pilot's license with instrument and multi-engine ratings
ATP or R-ATP eligible
Military fixed wing pilots need 750 hours total time
Military rotor pilots need 750 hours total time that must include 250 hours fixed wing time
Minimum 25 hours multi-engine
A current first class FAA medical certificate
A current ATP written (company covers cost of ATP-CTP for successful candidates)
Current valid passport
FCC Radio Operator's Permit
Legal right to work in, and travel freely in and out of, the United States
Non-military pilots don't have this advantage. It is a change to the "rules" that the FAA had but under pressure, they modified the rules to apply to a specific, targeted group...a good decision IMHO but nonetheless it was a "relief" from the original rule that had the blanket 1500 fixed wing hr requirement..."relief" or "change"...tomatos, tomatas
MILITARY PILOTS HIRING REQUIREMENTS
FAA commercial pilot's license with instrument and multi-engine ratings
ATP or R-ATP eligible
Military fixed wing pilots need 750 hours total time
Military rotor pilots need 750 hours total time that must include 250 hours fixed wing time
Minimum 25 hours multi-engine
A current first class FAA medical certificate
A current ATP written (company covers cost of ATP-CTP for successful candidates)
Current valid passport
FCC Radio Operator's Permit
Legal right to work in, and travel freely in and out of, the United States
Non-military pilots don't have this advantage. It is a change to the "rules" that the FAA had but under pressure, they modified the rules to apply to a specific, targeted group...a good decision IMHO but nonetheless it was a "relief" from the original rule that had the blanket 1500 fixed wing hr requirement..."relief" or "change"...tomatos, tomatas
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post