Planesense
#2241
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 29
200 XC but like the other user mentioned, I was using the 50nm between airports definition, not the between any two airports definition.
I'll bet if I tallied it up I'd be close if not at 500 XC.
That said, I'm also 25 short on night time and 25 actual IMC, and another 200 hours of TT to build. That's the easy one though.
I'll bet if I tallied it up I'd be close if not at 500 XC.
That said, I'm also 25 short on night time and 25 actual IMC, and another 200 hours of TT to build. That's the easy one though.
#2242
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 451
500 XC but like the other user mentioned, I was using the 50nm between airports definition, not the between any two airports definition.
I'll bet if I tallied it up I'd be 500 XC
That said, I'm also 25 Over on night time and 25 actual IMC, and another 200 hours of TT to build. That's the easy one though.
I'll bet if I tallied it up I'd be 500 XC
That said, I'm also 25 Over on night time and 25 actual IMC, and another 200 hours of TT to build. That's the easy one though.
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
#2243
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 441
If you want to be hired as a DEC you would you would need to meet all the requirements of 135.243. However if your short on some of the hours then get hired as a FO then upgrade when you meet the PIC requirements.
#2244
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 451
Sent from my SM-G977U using Tapatalk
#2245
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 29
I'm only at 1,000 TT so I'll reapply when I get a little higher up on the requirements. I know on the website they wanted TAA time and CFIIs, so I've got that going for me as well.
#2247
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: FO
Posts: 627
SIC. 95% of what they do is under 91K, not 135. There is no single pilot exemption for 91K regardless of aircraft, so 2nd in command is required.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#2248
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: Pilatus PIC
Posts: 47
1 Attitude
2 Poor IFR skills
3 Inability to learn the avionics
The remedies are simple:
1 take advice with a grain of salt and an open mind
2 MS flight simulator and studying
3 Honeywell videos on YouTube and study
DECs washout almost exclusively to number 1, FOs to 2 and 3.
N.b. I don't speak for the company or training department, just my .02
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
#2249
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: CFI, II
Posts: 130
#2250
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 281
You are not the PIC on the paperwork. It's not like instruction. FOs fly the repo legs which are part 91 where you can log TT only, unless you want to get into the weeds about logging sole manipulator PIC, but I don't suggest it. On legs with pax (91k or 135) you can log SIC since you are a required crew member per the opspecs
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post