XOJET TRAINING AND CHECK RIDE Failures up!
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 286
I have no dog in the hunt with XO, but will say that anyone in the right seat should know the flows for the left, and the callouts and the procedures. Anyone in the right seat should be looking at the left seat as their goal, and should be prepared to get in that seat. It doesn't matter if someone spends most of their time in the right seat and only checks in the left on occasion. If one is studying and refreshing, and reviewing, then it shouldn't be an issue to get in the sim and operate from the other seat insofar as the calls and procedures.
If hired as an F/O, then day one of initial training is also day one of upgrade, and if someone doesn't start with a company with that in mind, they're behind the eightball. Those who make good upgrades are those who don't stop studying and preparing. Those who don't, and those who tend to fail checkrides, are typically those who coast along between training events, without ever cracking a book or .pdf.
.
If hired as an F/O, then day one of initial training is also day one of upgrade, and if someone doesn't start with a company with that in mind, they're behind the eightball. Those who make good upgrades are those who don't stop studying and preparing. Those who don't, and those who tend to fail checkrides, are typically those who coast along between training events, without ever cracking a book or .pdf.
.
When everyone is turning to look at YOU for a decision, it’s daunting the first time.
As for knowing my FO’s job, I do know pretty much what I’m going to hear from him but could I jump over there and do it flawlessly? Hell no. It’s not my job. Can either of us jump in the other seat and “get out of town” if the world is on fire? Of course. But, unless your company has a “everyone is a Captain” policy (my 91 department was all CA qualified so we swapped seats and legs so we DID have to know the flows and responsibilities for both seats.). I don’t expect my FO’s to be proficient at my job and vice versa.
Your post is good guidance for low time FO’s who are just learning the crew environment, however.
TC
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 751
#43
On Reserve
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 24
I am someone who give check rides for XO. I don’t know where the check ride failure rate of 40% came from but I know it is nowhere close to that. I have had to retrain some things but failures are not sky high. As for failed upgrades, I don’t know the failure rate of those. The only part of our upgrade process that is an FAA “jeopardy event” is the .299 Line Check. Our Captain Review Board is an in house evaluation. The standards are high on CRB’s because of the amount of responsibility that goes with upgrading.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 199
The in house training program that got spun up at CAE DFW, was much better than the outsourced training we had. It was in fact, the only department that worked correctly in the past two years. It was more company specific, and more consistent, and I felt like I got way more out of it. The check rides were basically the same, and nothing hard. Coming through as a new hire you would be better prepared with the in house VS. the outsourced we had. Hell, at least you got a real oral with the company training. I know some of the reasons people have failed checkrides (it’s not 40% btw, or even 20%) and they were given every chance to pass the basic simple maneuvers that are completed on these types of checkrides. I think vista is in the process of gutting the in house training anyways as they perceive it as an additional expense even though it saves them money and promotes increased safety.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
The in house training program that got spun up at CAE DFW, was much better than the outsourced training we had. It was in fact, the only department that worked correctly in the past two years. It was more company specific, and more consistent, and I felt like I got way more out of it. The check rides were basically the same, and nothing hard. Coming through as a new hire you would be better prepared with the in house VS. the outsourced we had. Hell, at least you got a real oral with the company training. I know some of the reasons people have failed checkrides (it’s not 40% btw, or even 20%) and they were given every chance to pass the basic simple maneuvers that are completed on these types of checkrides. I think vista is in the process of gutting the in house training anyways as they perceive it as an additional expense even though it saves them money and promotes increased safety.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 313
I am someone who give check rides for XO. I don’t know where the check ride failure rate of 40% came from but I know it is nowhere close to that. I have had to retrain some things but failures are not sky high. As for failed upgrades, I don’t know the failure rate of those. The only part of our upgrade process that is an FAA “jeopardy event” is the .299 Line Check. Our Captain Review Board is an in house evaluation. The standards are high on CRB’s because of the amount of responsibility that goes with upgrading.
,Jay is a Solid new DO, he’s a legend for ass kicking at United! Visit and Mr book are cleaning house it sounds like!
#47
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 91
just got an email from an old buddy that all training department people were fired at XOJET after 50% upgrade failures and lots of people jumping ship and new management pilots were being installed, this comes with an email from FlexJet saying they are giving preferential interviews to all Netjet and XOJET current and former pilots, $35K pay raise to the $100k starting pay if you have a 350 type? At a major now but best of luck, sounds like XO of old imploded!
There couldn’t BE any more lies in this post! Listen. Xojet is now a stuttering clusterfark, I do admit, but that failure rate is BS!
#48
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 91
Again. More twisting of the truth. Skye left way before the in house training was up and running, and Matt left for the airlines. Sheesh! I hate the internet.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Poolside
Posts: 534
This is in no way a reference to any of the potential falsehoods in previous posts, but I’m so sad to see what’s happening to XOJET. I really enjoyed my time there and all the folks I interacted with! It was a rockstar of an outfit. I hope those who have left have all found a wonderful place to land!!!
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 199
just got an email from an old buddy that all training department people were fired at XOJET after 50% upgrade failures and lots of people jumping ship and new management pilots were being installed, this comes with an email from FlexJet saying they are giving preferential interviews to all Netjet and XOJET current and former pilots, $35K pay raise to the $100k starting pay if you have a 350 type? At a major now but best of luck, sounds like XO of old imploded!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM