Search
Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

The FAA is after me!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2008, 03:30 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tgaug6300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Company Pilot
Posts: 110
Default

If the FAA calls you and wants to ask you questions about it, SAY NOTHING!!! They may try to say that they are calling to really just get some facts (try to be your friend)and that is it. But that is a lie and they can use whatever you say against you. Have them contact your lawyer for further details.
One of our crews experienced this too. The crew just wound up having to go to FlightSafety for additional training.
Tgaug6300 is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 05:39 PM
  #12  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjock13 View Post
I filed one as soon as I landed. Got the recipt in the mail a few weeks ago. I know it offers some protection, but for the life of me I can't understand why the Denver FSDO has such a hard on for this. I heard a SWA crew "bust" an altitude but the center didn't have them make a call.
If you did it right it should protect you from disciplinary action...but if they violate you it will still go in your record which is the real concern (you don't want to explain it to future employers). I'd talk to a lawyer too.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 05:43 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purpledriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 107
Default

If you filed the NASA report you should be good. DON'T LOSE THAT RECEIPT THEY SENT YOU......That's your ticket protection. The other guys are right, contact you union office (if your in a union job) and don't talk to the FAA without a legal rep. I would bet you'll be done with this soon enough, but the FAA is under the scope themselves these days and they get bent about anthing over 200 feet in RVSM..
Good Luck
Purpledriver is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 07:01 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
DigDug's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 43
Default

If you really had a "faulty" Alt Cap and wrote it up then you are off the hook before you ever got on. You still may be able to use the issue to slide right off the hook nice and easy like even if wasn't written up and you can explain how it was still an automation glitch you had to recover from.
DigDug is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 07:15 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 359
Default

It seems the FAA used to be like this 'no harm no foul'. Now its a different story. It seems as if they are reporting every minor issue to the FDSO's.

Watch out in Detroit. They have been REALLY bad in the last year. Small heading errors (flying 200 instead of 220) had resulted in NO separation issues, were reported.

I just talked to my buddy and he is saying the supervisors are the problem. The sups are getting so anal that the controllers have to report everything, if they don't its grounds for termination.
He also said the FAA gives 'points' to managers for writing controller up.

The way things are going now soon every pilot will have a violation on their record.
Spooled is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 07:59 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
warhawk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

What he said

The Denver contingent of the Friendly Aviation Association is legendary for being particularly prickly. Had the unfortunate opportunity to "work" with them in the past.

I assume you have received a certified letter officially stating the FSDO intends to investigate. If so, time to Lawyer up.

Best of luck.
warhawk is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:16 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
warhawk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

Also, As Tgaug6300 stated, do not talk to them when they call you on the phone for a "friendly conversation." This is textbook FAA strategy. His speaker phone will be on with another co-worker in the room writing down every word. Let your aviation lawyer draft your official response.

Unlike a court of law, the FAA adminstrative investigation process is not procedurely constrained. Stated another way, in the Kangaroo Court of the FAA, second, and third hand hearsay evidence is completely admissable. This includes whatever "evidence" an inspector can get you to share with him over the phone. Hence the reason never talk to one immediately after an accident or incident when you're still rattled from the experience.
warhawk is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 08:21 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Flying both desk and jet
Posts: 147
Default

JetJock13:

First if the situation you speak about is over 2 weeks old, and the FAA did not call or write you, they can not violate you. The FAA has two weeks to contact and violate.

After the two weeks, the only thing they can do is issue a letter of warning that follows you for two years.

About 4 years ago, DFW center accused me of flying through the radial I was told to intercept. I stated I did not by all indications in the cockpit. As far as I know, we never received a TCAS, there was no loss of separation. When I told the inspector I would like to see the proof of what was on the tape, he said he would provide it, but in court and then he would try and get a violation. (That is they only way to violate after two week, in court.)

A friend had the same threat made with an altitude bust. The inspectors are not your friend. When something comes across their desk, someone is to blame, whether pilot or controller. I was told by a former inspector, the easiest way to get the file closed is to issue a letter of warning.

Hope this info helps.
alwaysflying is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 09:00 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Knightrider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 51
Default

Use the union lawyer. That is what you pay dues for. I dout it will come to anything, but it doesn't hurt to be prepared.
Knightrider is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 12:24 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Default

Isnt this why transponders have an off switch?

Best of luck to you man.
Chickenwolf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aafurloughee
Fractional
41
06-25-2008 06:43 PM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices