Search
Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

Xojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2019, 12:34 PM
  #1471  
Gets Weekends Off
 
B727DRVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Posts: 918
Angry Alaska pilots were FURLOUGHED..

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Not much different from Alaska Airlines who sent 140 furlough letters out on Christmas Eve in 1992.

But beyond that...how many Challenger 350 pilots are they looking for?
Hey Packrat,

Unfortunately, there was a huge difference in the way Alaska pilots were treated and the way XOJET pilots were treated. As unfortunate as their furlough was, the Alaska pilots were FURLOUGHED by seniority and were given contractually protected recall by seniority order. They got to keep their date of hire company longevity for pay and bidding purposes. And when recall time came, they were recalled in seniority order. Again, getting furloughed sucks, but it is nothing in comparison to a TERMINATION.

XOJET pilots, on the other hand, were TERMINATED with NO NOTICE. Pilots lucky enough to be off were called by the D.O. and read a form letter spelling out their summary “executions”. Other pilots never got a call, and found out that they were fired when their Company email and Company phones quit working. Pilots unfortunate enough to be working that day were greeted upon landing with a letter handed to them by security, and their ID’s and Company property was confiscated. Other pilots were diverted in flight to airports where security was standing by for them, too. When word of the blood bath got out, some pilots who were flying trips called in to make sure that their jobs were OK. Several were lied to, and were fired as soon as they landed. This heartless and cowardly act was repeated with 23 pilots, or roughly 20 percent of the pilot group 2 weeks before Christmas. From that day forward, those pilots will have to check TERMINATED on online applications that can filter you out for Accident, Incident, Violation, TERMINATION, DWI, Felony, No 4 year degree, etc. In this day of online applications, these pilots may never get a chance to explain to a real person as to WHY they were terminated rather than furloughed.

Defenders of this atrocity quipped that there were some “bad apples” in that bunch, but do you really believe that 23 pilots deserved to be fired in one afternoon? Did they all screw up at the same time?

While this did not affect me personally, or my several friends there, it did affect 23 fellow pilots, and when even 1 pilot is furloughed or wrongly terminated, it hurts and weakens us all. That is why I repeat this story whenever something similar comes up, but especially at XOJET.. So whenever I hear the euphemism of “let go”, or “force reduction”, it angers me that something much more sinister has happened (at least in XOJET’s case).

I do realize that they have a new management team, now, and the perpetrators of this atrocity have moved on, but it is important to remember that this happened in recent history. Unless a company has a written Reduction in Force (Furlough Policy), this can happen again. Pilots should push hard for this at their individual companies in order to avoid a termination on their record simply because the market turned South. Avoiding having to check that box is something that all pilots should strive for.
B727DRVR is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 06:46 PM
  #1472  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
I'll bite. Why are you laughing?

There are a lot of 10,000-20,000 hour pilots who hire into ACMI positions with the same schedule.
Oh I misread. I thought they were looking for someone with 3000 pic time to be hired as an sic. 1000 minimum total hours to be an sic might actually be attractive to a pilot starting out to do some time building but that 500 turbine time requirement is a head scratcher.
pixelflying is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 07:43 PM
  #1473  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,940
Default

Originally Posted by B727DRVR View Post
Hey Packrat,

Unfortunately, there was a huge difference in the way Alaska pilots were treated and the way XOJET pilots were treated. As unfortunate as their furlough was, the Alaska pilots were FURLOUGHED by seniority and were given contractually protected recall by seniority order. They got to keep their date of hire company longevity for pay and bidding purposes. And when recall time came, they were recalled in seniority order. Again, getting furloughed sucks, but it is nothing in comparison to a TERMINATION.

XOJET pilots, on the other hand, were TERMINATED with NO NOTICE. Pilots lucky enough to be off were called by the D.O. and read a form letter spelling out their summary “executions”. Other pilots never got a call, and found out that they were fired when their Company email and Company phones quit working. Pilots unfortunate enough to be working that day were greeted upon landing with a letter handed to them by security, and their ID’s and Company property was confiscated. Other pilots were diverted in flight to airports where security was standing by for them, too. When word of the blood bath got out, some pilots who were flying trips called in to make sure that their jobs were OK. Several were lied to, and were fired as soon as they landed. This heartless and cowardly act was repeated with 23 pilots, or roughly 20 percent of the pilot group 2 weeks before Christmas. From that day forward, those pilots will have to check TERMINATED on online applications that can filter you out for Accident, Incident, Violation, TERMINATION, DWI, Felony, No 4 year degree, etc. In this day of online applications, these pilots may never get a chance to explain to a real person as to WHY they were terminated rather than furloughed.

Defenders of this atrocity quipped that there were some “bad apples” in that bunch, but do you really believe that 23 pilots deserved to be fired in one afternoon? Did they all screw up at the same time?

While this did not affect me personally, or my several friends there, it did affect 23 fellow pilots, and when even 1 pilot is furloughed or wrongly terminated, it hurts and weakens us all. That is why I repeat this story whenever something similar comes up, but especially at XOJET.. So whenever I hear the euphemism of “let go”, or “force reduction”, it angers me that something much more sinister has happened (at least in XOJET’s case).

I do realize that they have a new management team, now, and the perpetrators of this atrocity have moved on, but it is important to remember that this happened in recent history. Unless a company has a written Reduction in Force (Furlough Policy), this can happen again. Pilots should push hard for this at their individual companies in order to avoid a termination on their record simply because the market turned South. Avoiding having to check that box is something that all pilots should strive for.

As someone who was unwittingly part of keeping one of these 23 pilots on their flight west followed by termination, thank you for the detailed explanation of what happened. Even I wasn't aware of the security guards. History forgotten is history repeated.
Smooth at FL450 is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 10:31 PM
  #1474  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
Default

Originally Posted by pixelflying View Post
Oh I misread. I thought they were looking for someone with 3000 pic time to be hired as an sic. 1000 minimum total hours to be an sic might actually be attractive to a pilot starting out to do some time building but that 500 turbine time requirement is a head scratcher.
Are you suggesting that someone with 3,000 hours is too experienced to be hired into a SIC position???

What's such a "head-scratcher" about requiring 500 hours of turbine experience?

Again, there are pilots with 20,000 hours hiring into 17 day schedules...and they hire on as SIC, not necessarily as a direct entry captain.

Have pilot opinions become so inflated that they really think that at 3,000 hours they're experienced and a hot commodity?

Just another warm body.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 04:17 AM
  #1475  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
Are you suggesting that someone with 3,000 hours is too experienced to be hired into a SIC position???

What's such a "head-scratcher" about requiring 500 hours of turbine experience?

Again, there are pilots with 20,000 hours hiring into 17 day schedules...and they hire on as SIC, not necessarily as a direct entry captain.

Have pilot opinions become so inflated that they really think that at 3,000 hours they're experienced and a hot commodity?

Just another warm body.
3K hours, you ought to be hiring into the majors and not charter outfits.
Fredturbo is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 04:39 AM
  #1476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Fredturbo View Post
3K hours, you ought to be hiring into the majors and not charter outfits.
So everyone with 3,000 hrs needs to be an airline pilot?

I know it is hard to believe, especially on APC, but not everyone WANTS TO BE OR CAN BE a major airline pilot.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 04:51 AM
  #1477  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,940
Default

Originally Posted by Fredturbo View Post
3K hours, you ought to be hiring into the majors and not charter outfits.

3K will only get you looked at at the majors if its all military time...otherwise, odds are slim. (I'm talking about the big players)
Smooth at FL450 is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 04:58 PM
  #1478  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,003
Default

Originally Posted by Fredturbo View Post
3K hours, you ought to be hiring into the majors and not charter outfits.
That's a rather presumptuous and arrogant assumption.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 01-28-2019, 05:18 PM
  #1479  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
That's a rather presumptuous and arrogant assumption.
These boards abound with these : )
727C47 is offline  
Old 01-29-2019, 01:01 PM
  #1480  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Does anyone know what the story is with the Challenger 350 jobs they're advertising?
Packrat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetjockee
Fractional
110
08-19-2014 01:47 PM
flyhi
Corporate
6
01-05-2009 08:23 PM
Bill Lumberg
Fractional
44
10-16-2008 10:08 AM
USMCFLYR
Fractional
17
09-20-2008 05:29 PM
G400driver
Fractional
1
09-18-2008 07:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices