Flexjet hiring ?
#481
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
To add to my response, not all circumstances are the same. If you are looking for a career company, this is not it right now. If you are already here, have a short time until retirement, and many years invested in the company, staying to effect change instead of throwing away all your seniority may be the best decision. The typical company Tool response is: "Why don't you just leave?" But that is not the right answer for every situation. Right now, my answer is to effect change here. But my advice to those of you looking to start or further a career is to pick an environment that is cooperative rather than Flexjet's toxic environment. There are far too many cooperative, positive moves for the pilot just starting out.
#482
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Posts: 918
Your logic is flawed..
Except it really is that easy. There are guys who have been on Red Label leave, training dept guys have left. They gave up their time invested in the company and left. The tool response has been when you continuously call management scumbags and voice your disdain for the company yet you won't leave. I'm sure you're a lot of fun to fly with. Nothing like listening about how horrible management is while they buy your 85 dollar meal.
"If you don't like it, why don't you just leave?" This is the standard battle cry for apologists for scumbag and draconian managements throughout time. But if everyone in aviation had heeded this flawed logic, there would be no "majors". Back then, Executive Jet was not a good place to work, with low pay and only 5 bases. Look at them now, as Netjets, thanks to their Union and former union fighting to make things better.
The same goes with all the "major" airlines... In the 1930's and 1940's, the "majors" were all dirtbag places to work with "fly it or you are fired", just like in today's Part 135, and some 91K, operators, but those pilots dug their heels in and decided to fight.
And this is why we have Netjets vs. everyone else in 135/91k and why the "majors" are the majors.
Please leave the fight to improving the life of Flexjet/Flight Options pilots to the other pilots here obviously involved in the fight and get back to making copies in the office for Management. They really appreciate it.
#483
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 171
Squirts,
"If you don't like it, why don't you just leave?" This is the standard battle cry for apologists for scumbag and draconian managements throughout time. But if everyone in aviation had heeded this flawed logic, there would be no "majors". Back then, Executive Jet was not a good place to work, with low pay and only 5 bases. Look at them now, as Netjets, thanks to their Union and former union fighting to make things better.
The same goes with all the "major" airlines... In the 1930's and 1940's, the "majors" were all dirtbag places to work with "fly it or you are fired", just like in today's Part 135, and some 91K, operators, but those pilots dug their heels in and decided to fight.
And this is why we have Netjets vs. everyone else in 135/91k and why the "majors" are the majors.
Please leave the fight to improving the life of Flexjet/Flight Options pilots to the other pilots here obviously involved in the fight and get back to making copies in the office for Management. They really appreciate it.
"If you don't like it, why don't you just leave?" This is the standard battle cry for apologists for scumbag and draconian managements throughout time. But if everyone in aviation had heeded this flawed logic, there would be no "majors". Back then, Executive Jet was not a good place to work, with low pay and only 5 bases. Look at them now, as Netjets, thanks to their Union and former union fighting to make things better.
The same goes with all the "major" airlines... In the 1930's and 1940's, the "majors" were all dirtbag places to work with "fly it or you are fired", just like in today's Part 135, and some 91K, operators, but those pilots dug their heels in and decided to fight.
And this is why we have Netjets vs. everyone else in 135/91k and why the "majors" are the majors.
Please leave the fight to improving the life of Flexjet/Flight Options pilots to the other pilots here obviously involved in the fight and get back to making copies in the office for Management. They really appreciate it.
#485
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 160
Growth?
I am wondering where this 50 percent growth is? KR did not even say that in his recent annual meeting! They did mention retiring the FO brand so if you count the forcing of all of the FO owners out of the Nextant program and now factor in closing down the Citation X and Legacies forcing those owners to purchase Flex shares, you could maybe call it 50 percent growth. Along with having the arbitrator granting the vsp the company is short pilots but not really from market share growth.
#487
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 27
Wow, Dutch, we actually agree on something, I'm shocked. The ones who order 85 dollar meals are tools. I've never said anything to management about anyone, I'm fully capable of handling my differences with my flying partner without anyone else getting involved. In fact, if it doesn't involve sports, or a few hobbies, I really don't have anything to talk about because I don't give a crap about what airplanes are on the ramp or who has what contract etc. I'm pretty sure you're on the 300 so we will probably be paired up at some point. I'll look for the teamsters strong bag tag.
#489
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 171
#490
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 171
So the arbitrator has ordered management to present their compensation proposal to us by the 26th. I'm not sure if he will allow it to be made public or not. But we will know whether management is "bargaining in our best interest" as JW said in his email, or if they are full of...it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post