Netjets latest & greatest:
12-01-2017, 09:14 PM
#2961
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Originally Posted by New Guy 007
You can't work at NASA, and be a dummy. Also, checked back a few months of threads Jetlife stated on 9-25-17 something about 1400 folks to be hired in 2018, any truth?
That doesn’t sound like something I’d say lol. I’d be utterly shocked if they hired 100 pilots in 2018. They hired maybe 15-30 in 2017?
12-02-2017, 03:28 AM
#2962
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: CA
Posts: 109
Originally Posted by Jetlife
I’m just messing around about your girl.
That doesn’t sound like something I’d say lol. I’d be utterly shocked if they hired 100 pilots in 2018. They hired maybe 15-30 in 2017?
That doesn’t sound like something I’d say lol. I’d be utterly shocked if they hired 100 pilots in 2018. They hired maybe 15-30 in 2017?
I don't think any were hired in 2017.
12-02-2017, 08:59 AM
#2964
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
So how do you all think this new tax bill will impact companies like NetJets? Obviously us pilots are all going to get higher wages and more tips due to the tried and proven trickle down effect, (sarcasm) but is it likely to lead to more business for private jet operators?
12-02-2017, 10:29 AM
#2965
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 224
Originally Posted by Das Auto
So how do you all think this new tax bill will impact companies like NetJets? Obviously us pilots are all going to get higher wages and more tips due to the tried and proven trickle down effect, (sarcasm) but is it likely to lead to more business for private jet operators?
Pilots should take home more of their pay (generally) but NJA isn't expanding regardless. No orders, no plans on hiring, no profit sharing.
Even if the tax plan resulted in 100,000 more people trying to fly in private jets, NJA might pick up 50 new owners.
12-02-2017, 11:25 AM
#2967
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by BuckeyeFO
Pilots should take home more of their pay
This bill clearly favors the very wealthy ie NetJets type clientel. Now they have more disposable income could that translate into more business for NetJets? I know business get to write off private aviation as a business expense and depreciate the asset, but could that have an effect on orders?
12-02-2017, 01:20 PM
#2968
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Originally Posted by Das Auto
Maybe, until tax refund time when they can't deduct their state income tax and the standard deduction is too high to itemize. What it gives in one hand it taketh more from the other.
This bill clearly favors the very wealthy ie NetJets type clientel. Now they have more disposable income could that translate into more business for NetJets? I know business get to write off private aviation as a business expense and depreciate the asset, but could that have an effect on orders?
This bill clearly favors the very wealthy ie NetJets type clientel. Now they have more disposable income could that translate into more business for NetJets? I know business get to write off private aviation as a business expense and depreciate the asset, but could that have an effect on orders?
12-02-2017, 03:31 PM
#2969
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 224
Originally Posted by Das Auto
Maybe, until tax refund time when they can't deduct their state income tax and the standard deduction is too high to itemize. What it gives in one hand it taketh more from the other.
This bill clearly favors the very wealthy ie NetJets type clientel. Now they have more disposable income could that translate into more business for NetJets? I know business get to write off private aviation as a business expense and depreciate the asset, but could that have an effect on orders?
This bill clearly favors the very wealthy ie NetJets type clientel. Now they have more disposable income could that translate into more business for NetJets? I know business get to write off private aviation as a business expense and depreciate the asset, but could that have an effect on orders?
If you live in California, pay 13.3% state income tax, and have 6 kids, you probably won't take home more.
If you live in Columbus and make 150k, chances are that you'll pay less in taxes.
NJA Business Wise:
None of this matters because NJA doesn't have the airplanes or crews to grow and they haven't shown any indication of doing either.
12-02-2017, 04:43 PM
#2970
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by BuckeyeFO
That's why I said "should" and not "will".
If you live in California, pay 13.3% state income tax, and have 6 kids, you probably won't take home more.
If you live in Columbus and make 150k, chances are that you'll pay less in taxes.
If you live in California, pay 13.3% state income tax, and have 6 kids, you probably won't take home more.
If you live in Columbus and make 150k, chances are that you'll pay less in taxes.
(Except for the $1 trillion hole in the deficit problem.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
