Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Frontier Negotiations Discussion >

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Search
Notices

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2018, 09:22 AM
  #3511  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 410
Default

Originally Posted by butthert View Post
We cannot make up for the mistakes of the past but we can finally get out from under a bankrupt CBA .
What? We are not working under a bankrupt CBA. We are working under our 2007 CBA, which at the time was industry leading in some regards. We enjoyed industry LEADING Airbus 320 pay. We enjoyed some of the best work rules in the industry with our line bidding system that provided us with incredible flexibility and control of our schedule with our generous add, drop, swap, trade, or slide ability.

Then bankruptcy happened. In the face of that challenge and the real possibility of Frontier going out of business, we were still able to maintain most of our CBA and QOL provisions it afforded us. Our pay and 401K were reduced, but we maintained our work rules. Under the agreement we eventually returned to our 2007 pay and 401K.

Fast forward to today. Frontier survived and Frontier has thrived, with much credit to our pilot group. It is time for us to receive the benefits or spoils from the sacrifices that we have made over the last 10 years.

Why are we now considering accepting industry BOTTOM pay and give away QOL provisions of our contract that we didn’t even give away during the bankruptcy?

It is the BEST of times in our chosen field. Now is the time to join the pattern.
ColdWhiskey is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 10:07 AM
  #3512  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey View Post
What? We are not working under a bankrupt CBA. We are working under our 2007 CBA, which at the time was industry leading in some regards. We enjoyed industry LEADING Airbus 320 pay. We enjoyed some of the best work rules in the industry with our line bidding system that provided us with incredible flexibility and control of our schedule with our generous add, drop, swap, trade, or slide ability.

Then bankruptcy happened. In the face of that challenge and the real possibility of Frontier going out of business, we were still able to maintain most of our CBA and QOL provisions it afforded us. Our pay and 401K were reduced, but we maintained our work rules. Under the agreement we eventually returned to our 2007 pay and 401K.

Fast forward to today. Frontier survived and Frontier has thrived, with much credit to our pilot group. It is time for us to receive the benefits or spoils from the sacrifices that we have made over the last 10 years.

Why are we now considering accepting industry BOTTOM pay and give away QOL provisions of our contract that we didn’t even give away during the bankruptcy?

It is the BEST of times in our chosen field. Now is the time to join the pattern.

Well said!
Bolo is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 11:53 AM
  #3513  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey View Post
What? We are not working under a bankrupt CBA. We are working under our 2007 CBA, which at the time was industry leading in some regards. We enjoyed industry LEADING Airbus 320 pay. We enjoyed some of the best work rules in the industry with our line bidding system that provided us with incredible flexibility and control of our schedule with our generous add, drop, swap, trade, or slide ability.

Then bankruptcy happened. In the face of that challenge and the real possibility of Frontier going out of business, we were still able to maintain most of our CBA and QOL provisions it afforded us. Our pay and 401K were reduced, but we maintained our work rules. Under the agreement we eventually returned to our 2007 pay and 401K.

Fast forward to today. Frontier survived and Frontier has thrived, with much credit to our pilot group. It is time for us to receive the benefits or spoils from the sacrifices that we have made over the last 10 years.

Why are we now considering accepting industry BOTTOM pay and give away QOL provisions of our contract that we didn’t even give away during the bankruptcy?

It is the BEST of times in our chosen field. Now is the time to join the pattern.
I COULD NOT AGREE MORE!!!
As I have said before. This contract negotiation process should have been nothing more then a market adjustment for pay, retirement and benefits. I understand there was a need to help the company with some improved operational efficiencies and productivity enhancements. This would be a win win for both parties and ensure the continued profit and success of our airline once Indigo finally goes away. This was addressed early on during negotiations with the scheduling TA allowing reserves to pick up open time on days off and establishing a premium folder to replace the VJA/JA process. That in itself was a huge sacrifice by eliminating a seniority based process for premium flying with zero in base protection. I think it was also agreed that the bidding process was going to be streamlined and shortened to complete MOT and bid awards in a shorter time frame.
Although, the fine print details have not been provided yet, I am certain under PBS, we will not enjoy the MOT drop, MOT swap and DOT period of flexibility we have had for many years. This process although not always perfect had set our contract above many others. (industry leading) I don’t believe the elimination of MOT and the 4% allowance for DOT will allow anywhere near the flexibility we have had in the past. I could be wrong without all the details, but I think this is a huge sacrifice for what we are getting in return in the areas of pay, retirement, per diem, LTD and length of this contract.
chinookwinds is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:02 PM
  #3514  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 330
Default

Originally Posted by chinookwinds View Post
I COULD NOT AGREE MORE!!!
As I have said before. This contract negotiation process should have been nothing more then a market adjustment for pay, retirement and benefits. I understand there was a need to help the company with some improved operational efficiencies and productivity enhancements. This would be a win win for both parties and ensure the continued profit and success of our airline once Indigo finally goes away. This was addressed early on during negotiations with the scheduling TA allowing reserves to pick up open time on days off and establishing a premium folder to replace the VJA/JA process. That in itself was a huge sacrifice by eliminating a seniority based process for premium flying with zero in base protection. I think it was also agreed that the bidding process was going to be streamlined and shortened to complete MOT and bid awards in a shorter time frame.
Although, the fine print details have not been provided yet, I am certain under PBS, we will not enjoy the MOT drop, MOT swap and DOT period of flexibility we have had for many years. This process although not always perfect had set our contract above many others. (industry leading) I don’t believe the elimination of MOT and the 4% allowance for DOT will allow anywhere near the flexibility we have had in the past. I could be wrong without all the details, but I think this is a huge sacrifice for what we are getting in return in the areas of pay, retirement, per diem, LTD and length of this contract.
Blah blah blah
More assumptions by NO voters ...
butthert is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:15 PM
  #3515  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 83
Default

Hey Butthert,
Did I say anything in my post, or other posts about voting no??
How long have you been at F9 anyway? Do you even understand the history of this airline or this pilot group? Just curious
chinookwinds is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 12:35 PM
  #3516  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by chinookwinds View Post
Hey Butthert,
Did I say anything in my post, or other posts about voting no??
How long have you been at F9 anyway? Do you even understand the history of this airline or this pilot group? Just curious

Obviously he/she does not! That is why you got a sophomoric response from him/her. Information has to flow both ways. Pro's and Con's. When the final contract is available for viewing then we all can make our final decisions.
Bolo is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:04 PM
  #3517  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

Originally Posted by Trowserchilli View Post

So your a yes vote without seeing the whole package? That’s just as bad as a straight no without seeing it. Maybe worse.
Well said. Completely agree.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 01:23 PM
  #3518  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by Bolo View Post
Obviously he/she does not! That is why you got a sophomoric response from him/her. Information has to flow both ways. Pro's and Con's. When the final contract is available for viewing then we all can make our final decisions.
Exactly, information has to flow both ways. I welcome and can learn from potential yes voters expressing their feelings now, even though a TA isn't in our hands. Why do so many of them not want to afford us (the skeptical among us) the same courtesy?

I honestly hope the yes guys are right. That would be great to end up looking like an ass because I am completely wrong about all of this and the contract ends up being worthy. Would have to be some ground breaking, industry leading, water tight language in there though.
Wheelswatch is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 03:08 PM
  #3519  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 464
Default

Originally Posted by Wheelswatch View Post
Exactly, information has to flow both ways. I welcome and can learn from potential yes voters expressing their feelings now, even though a TA isn't in our hands. Why do so many of them not want to afford us (the skeptical among us) the same courtesy?

I honestly hope the yes guys are right. That would be great to end up looking like an ass because I am completely wrong about all of this and the contract ends up being worthy. Would have to be some ground breaking, industry leading, water tight language in there though.
It's not worthy, it is a huge raise, and it does give us very comfortable yearly incomes for the average American. But it is also at the bottom of the industry, not even close to average, it is happening when there has never been another better bargaining environment, and it needs to be better. I can't imagine the language and work rules that would need to be present to bring the bullet points communicated up to a level that should be acceptable. The only reason it will likely pass is fear.

But yes I would also LOVE to look like a fool and have the union surprise us. I'm a realist though, there will be no great surprises.
Gary et al is offline  
Old 11-19-2018, 03:13 PM
  #3520  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by Gary et al View Post
It's not worthy, it is a huge raise, and it does give us very comfortable yearly incomes for the average American. But it is also at the bottom of the industry, not even close to average, it is happening when there has never been another better bargaining environment, and it needs to be better. I can't imagine the language and work rules that would need to be present to bring the bullet points communicated up to a level that should be acceptable. The only reason it will likely pass is fear.

But yes I would also LOVE to look like a fool and have the union surprise us. I'm a realist though, there will be no great surprises.
You're right
Wheelswatch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
319wisperer
Frontier
9479
06-20-2019 11:31 AM
Ravensvic
Frontier
71
10-18-2012 06:56 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices