Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Frontier (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/frontier/)
-   -   Can we talk Retro? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/frontier/113863-can-we-talk-retro.html)

FlyingR6 05-21-2018 12:50 PM

Can we talk Retro?
 
I'm not debating percentage, that's for the NC to do, but do we know how it's going to be distributed?

I figured we'd do it the tried and true way of - new rate, minus old rate, times hours worked during the duration -

Spirit did some longevity equation for their TA, and I hear others saying they want the same for us, is it truly fair? What am I missing? Isn't pay rate effectively a longevity marker? Admittedly, I'm on the lower half of the seniority list that's been here less than 5 years. But that's just it, half our seniority list is one extreme or the other. I know us junior guys don't want to get screwed either.

RustyChain 05-21-2018 01:29 PM

Getting a little ahead of ourselves.

MCDUie 05-21-2018 01:47 PM

According to DC it will be a flat rate paid according to your seat. ALPA no longer pays retro by hours flown because they’ve been sued in the past by training Dept pilots and ALPA volunteers.

OpenClimb 05-21-2018 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by MCDUie (Post 2599085)
According to DC it will be a flat rate paid according to your seat. ALPA no longer pays retro by hours flown because they’ve been sued in the past by training Dept pilots and ALPA volunteers.

Yet another reason for my no vote.

Aero1900 05-21-2018 02:38 PM

Let's not decide how we are voting until we have something to vote on.

Regarding retro pay, I assume that we will get a ratification incentive, and not backpay. How the union decides to divvy that up is a different question. I say, give FOs more money because they are the ones who haven't been making sh*t for money. What do you think of that?

Or we could go Bernie Sanders style and give the largest checks to the guys who have made the least money since the amenable date. Or we could give all the money to the captains because screw FOs.

I predict, somehow, more than 50% of guys will not be happy with the distribution of the money.

MCDUie 05-21-2018 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by OpenClimb (Post 2599103)
Yet another reason for my no vote.

I believe he said that was an ALPA National thing

Salukipilot4590 05-21-2018 03:06 PM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 2599124)
I predict, somehow, more than 50% of guys will not be happy with the distribution of the money.

I just need enough to buy spinning rims and a grille...

https://i.imgur.com/FpOk7qI.gif

https://i.imgur.com/qkYJ1qn.gif

FlyingR6 05-21-2018 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by MCDUie (Post 2599085)
According to DC it will be a flat rate paid according to your seat. ALPA no longer pays retro by hours flown because they’ve been sued in the past by training Dept pilots and ALPA volunteers.

I did not know that. Exactly why I started the thread. Thanks!

As far as it being too early? Nah, its completely in the NMBs hands now, what else are we going to complain about around here.

Aero1900 05-21-2018 04:42 PM

Captains will receive $50,000 each and first officers will each get a voucher for a turkey sandwich in their V file. Most of those vouchers will be stolen by flight attendants, but it won't matter because the vouchers will only be good at the schlotzsky's that closed this month. Captains will complain they didn't get a voucher.

Bolo 05-21-2018 05:16 PM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 2599216)
Captains will receive $50,000 each and first officers will each get a voucher for a turkey sandwich in their V file. Most of those vouchers will be stolen by flight attendants, but it won't matter because the vouchers will only be good at the schlotzsky's that closed this month. Captains will complain they didn't get a voucher.


Priceless!

RickGassko 05-21-2018 05:51 PM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 2599216)
Captains will receive $50,000 each and first officers will each get a voucher for a turkey sandwich in their V file. Most of those vouchers will be stolen by flight attendants, but it won't matter because the vouchers will only be good at the schlotzsky's that closed this month. Captains will complain they didn't get a voucher.

^^ This is why I creep APC 😂

Stiflers Mom 05-21-2018 06:19 PM


Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590 (Post 2599149)
I just need enough to buy spinning rims and a grille...

https://i.imgur.com/FpOk7qI.gif

https://i.imgur.com/qkYJ1qn.gif

If you wanted that kind of money you should have gone to Envoy.

Ohreallynow 05-21-2018 06:35 PM

I want enough for Barry to eat a very large slice of humble pie.

Powderkeg 05-21-2018 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by MCDUie (Post 2599085)
According to DC it will be a flat rate paid according to your seat. ALPA no longer pays retro by hours flown because they’ve been sued in the past by training Dept pilots and ALPA volunteers.

...and because paying by hours would reward those that have been doing extra flying. Disclaimer: I’m not saying anybody should or should not pick up extra flying. Second disclaimer: I have decided I will stay home on my days off and reward my family with my presence and tell my creditors they can wait.

ReserveCA 05-21-2018 07:01 PM

Simple
75 hrs per month back to April 2016 .... or no

NWSteeringArmer 05-21-2018 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by Ohreallynow (Post 2599306)
I want enough for Barry to eat a very large slice of humble pie.

That guy’s a slice of any kind of pie from exploding...

NWSteeringArmer 05-21-2018 07:35 PM


Originally Posted by ReserveCA (Post 2599325)
Simple
75 hrs per month back to April 2016 .... or no

That’s our guarantee... that’s logical... which means it ain’t happening

sailingfun 05-21-2018 08:43 PM


Originally Posted by MCDUie (Post 2599085)
According to DC it will be a flat rate paid according to your seat. ALPA no longer pays retro by hours flown because they’ve been sued in the past by training Dept pilots and ALPA volunteers.

It has been paid out by W2 in several recent contracts including the Delta contract. How it is paid is up to each airlines MEC and negotiating committee. ALPA is not in the process. Retro pay by its very description is to make you whole based on the amendable date of the contract. Hard to get sued if you respect that in the payouts.

303flyboy 05-21-2018 09:09 PM

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post

Captains will receive $50,000 each and first officers will each get a voucher for a turkey sandwich in their V file. Most of those vouchers will be stolen by flight attendants, but it won't matter because the vouchers will only be good at the schlotzsky's that closed this month. Captains will complain they didn't get a voucher.“
——

I love this 😁. All true. I give my vouchers to the FAs anyway. They need it more than me

ClearCreek 05-21-2018 09:55 PM

I’m curious, was retro on the table for Spirit?

flycrj200 05-22-2018 07:28 AM


Originally Posted by OpenClimb (Post 2599103)
Yet another reason for my no vote.

Vote no on what? What if you get a $1,000,000 in retro!

CrewRest 05-22-2018 08:21 AM

Also from what I understand we do no want any retro money to be labeled as a "bonus" from the company because of much higher tax rates. Does this sound correct? And of course it is absolutely not a bonus.

Blueskies67 05-22-2018 08:32 AM

Hawaiian paid the difference between new rate and old rate at 81 credits a month. Seems to be as fair as you can get.

CantStayAway 05-22-2018 08:43 AM


Originally Posted by CrewRest (Post 2599635)
Also from what I understand we do no want any retro money to be labeled as a "bonus" from the company because of much higher tax rates. Does this sound correct? And of course it is absolutely not a bonus.

This is a common misconception. Either way the taxes are the same. Large payments made at once (be it retro, bonus, etc) are WITHHELD at a higher rate. The reason for this is the company projects that income on a monthly basis. In other words if they pay you $40,000 at once then they project you to make at least $480,000 that year ($40k*12 months). Someone making that money pays more taxes then someone making $100k/year.

The good news is at any rate, you get back the tax overpayment in a refund when you file.

V1 McFlyerson 05-22-2018 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by CrewRest (Post 2599635)
Also from what I understand we do no want any retro money to be labeled as a "bonus" from the company because of much higher tax rates. Does this sound correct? And of course it is absolutely not a bonus.


Originally Posted by CantStayAway (Post 2599653)
This is a common misconception. Either way the taxes are the same. Large payments made at once (be it retro, bonus, etc) are WITHHELD at a higher rate. The reason for this is the company projects that income on a monthly basis. In other words if they pay you $40,000 at once then they project you to make at least $480,000 that year ($40k*12 months). Someone making that money pays more taxes then someone making $100k/year.

The good news is at any rate, you get back the tax overpayment in a refund when you file.

This.

Plus, looking at the agreed to LTD plan, it's apparent no one is thinking about tax implications.

CrewRest 05-22-2018 10:09 AM

Ahh.. ok thanks for explaining. That makes sense.

symbian simian 05-22-2018 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 2599216)
Captains will receive $50,000 each and first officers will each get a voucher for a turkey sandwich in their V file. Most of those vouchers will be stolen by flight attendants, but it won't matter because the vouchers will only be good at the schlotzsky's that closed this month. Captains will complain they didn't get a voucher.

https://i.imgur.com/rca0nT4.mp4

OpenClimb 05-22-2018 01:49 PM


Originally Posted by flycrj200 (Post 2599586)
Vote no on what? What if you get a $1,000,000 in retro!

Way to go Mr. Pedantic.

Please consider probability versus possibility.

The hourly rate ask is too low. Reserve rules weren’t fixed and are arguably worse than current book, long term disability still isn’t own occupation, per diem is industry trailing, we didn’t even ask for profit sharing, I don’t believe we will be seeing the ability to drop down to zero credit like Delta and (I believe) Spirit, Aaaaaand we’ve already agreed to a 5 year deal.

While it’s **possible** that all these things will be fixed in the 11th hour, it’s not **probable**. Hence, my no vote.

therapysession 05-22-2018 04:21 PM


Originally Posted by OpenClimb (Post 2599925)
Way to go Mr. Pedantic.

Please consider probability versus possibility.

The hourly rate ask is too low. Reserve rules weren’t fixed and are arguably worse than current book, long term disability still isn’t own occupation, per diem is industry trailing, we didn’t even ask for profit sharing, I don’t believe we will be seeing the ability to drop down to zero credit like Delta and (I believe) Spirit, Aaaaaand we’ve already agreed to a 5 year deal.

While it’s **possible** that all these things will be fixed in the 11th hour, it’s not **probable**. Hence, my no vote.

If we only have to fly on Wednesday's, does that mean every Wednesday? Seriously....there is nothing to vote on, not even bullet points from an AIP. Not even bullet points from a mediation session for that matter. This post is about as ridiculous as the guy posting about the GOA. Relax.

OpenClimb 05-22-2018 04:59 PM


Originally Posted by therapysession (Post 2600044)
If we only have to fly on Wednesday's, does that mean every Wednesday? Seriously....there is nothing to vote on, not even bullet points from an AIP. Not even bullet points from a mediation session for that matter. This post is about as ridiculous as the guy posting about the GOA. Relax.

Either you haven’t been paying attention or you’re not an F9 person. Yes, in fact, we do have bullet points from mediation sessions that confirm each of the points I referred to in my post. To the extent negotiation update emails do not provide exact and undeniable confirmation of each of the points I’ve referenced, I have sought and received confirmation via almost daily contact with P2P union volunteers.

The worst part about this situation is that even if we get everything we’re asking for, it will be a sub-standard AIP.

Shrek 05-22-2018 07:43 PM


Originally Posted by OpenClimb (Post 2600070)
Either you haven’t been paying attention or you’re not an F9 person. Yes, in fact, we do have bullet points from mediation sessions that confirm each of the points I referred to in my post. To the extent negotiation update emails do not provide exact and undeniable confirmation of each of the points I’ve referenced, I have sought and received confirmation via almost daily contact with P2P union volunteers.

The worst part about this situation is that even if we get everything we’re asking for, it will be a sub-standard AIP.

If it’s not good enough when voting on the eventual TA - vote NO !

SactisbonesBJ 05-22-2018 08:26 PM

You will get nothing...and like it!

monkeybrains 05-23-2018 04:42 PM


Originally Posted by ReserveCA (Post 2599325)
Simple
75 hrs per month back to April 2016 .... or no

We were amendable April 2017

sab1250 05-23-2018 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by monkeybrains (Post 2600946)
We were amendable April 2017

I think you’re forgetting LOA 67...

Patternholder 05-23-2018 08:29 PM

In the company’s letter to the NMB, they said ALPA’s proposal will cost them $750 million over the 5 years. I would expect at least $150 million a year in back pay for however long this thing drags on.

OpenClimb 05-24-2018 04:34 AM


Originally Posted by Patternholder (Post 2601096)
In the company’s letter to the NMB, they said ALPA’s proposal will cost them $750 million over the 5 years. I would expect at least $150 million a year in back pay for however long this thing drags on.

I like the way you think. Use their own faulty math against them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands