Flying Unicorns! Management*
01-18-2019, 06:47 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 146
Originally Posted by F9 NO Voter
I certainly hope you’re an FO and not a CA, because I look forward to flying with you. If you’re on the jet that I signed for, we WILL taxi on two motors if I say we will, or I’ll have YOUR ass in the CPO, as well as the FSDO, and I can promise it won’t turn out well for you.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/91.3
In turn, if I ever downgrade and you’re in charge, I will respect your authority and we can taxi on one motor all day long.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/91.3
In turn, if I ever downgrade and you’re in charge, I will respect your authority and we can taxi on one motor all day long.
01-18-2019, 08:03 AM
#42
New Hire
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 3
Originally Posted by Aero1900
Don't take it so personally. It's just business.
It's not healthy to get so emotionally upset. Don't let them have that much control over you.
Yeah, the company is an extremely labor unfriendly group of cold hearted businessmen. We all know that. But the fact is we have more job security and higher pay than we ever had with previous management teams.
Relax. Just do your job, go home and enjoy your life
It's not healthy to get so emotionally upset. Don't let them have that much control over you.
Yeah, the company is an extremely labor unfriendly group of cold hearted businessmen. We all know that. But the fact is we have more job security and higher pay than we ever had with previous management teams.
Relax. Just do your job, go home and enjoy your life
It is personal to the individual pilot.
That said, the Union needs to approach it like cold, hard, stone-faced business... just like management does.
01-18-2019, 08:44 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 410
Originally Posted by ToddChavez
Hahaha! We will return to the gate and you can get on the phone and explain yourself to the chief pilot... Unless there is a safety reason, we're not going to 2 engine taxi because you're holding a grudge.
This from the same guy that called the Denver police department and filed a criminal complaint for harassment against his fellow co-workers that mailed him a letter in support of a NO vote.
I am in disbelief that someone among us could be so petty. There is a name that comes to mind, but I am going to refrain.
01-18-2019, 08:57 AM
#44
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 330
Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey
Let me get this straight. If a captain fails to do a single engine taxi, you are going to call the CPO and ‘tell on’ that captain? Really?
This from the same guy that called the Denver police department and filed a criminal complaint for harassment against his fellow co-workers that mailed him a letter in support of a NO vote.
I am in disbelief that someone among us could be so petty. There is a name that comes to mind, but I am going to refrain.
This from the same guy that called the Denver police department and filed a criminal complaint for harassment against his fellow co-workers that mailed him a letter in support of a NO vote.
I am in disbelief that someone among us could be so petty. There is a name that comes to mind, but I am going to refrain.
The Airbus will tell on those that are wasting fuel.
01-18-2019, 09:11 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: seated - facing forward
Posts: 995
Originally Posted by butthert
No one should be calling the CPO. That is what pro standards is for.
The Airbus will tell on those that are wasting fuel.
The Airbus will tell on those that are wasting fuel.
01-18-2019, 12:00 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 617
Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey
Let me get this straight. If a captain fails to do a single engine taxi, you are going to call the CPO and ‘tell on’ that captain? Really?
This from the same guy that called the Denver police department and filed a criminal complaint for harassment against his fellow co-workers that mailed him a letter in support of a NO vote.
I am in disbelief that someone among us could be so petty. There is a name that comes to mind, but I am going to refrain.
This from the same guy that called the Denver police department and filed a criminal complaint for harassment against his fellow co-workers that mailed him a letter in support of a NO vote.
I am in disbelief that someone among us could be so petty. There is a name that comes to mind, but I am going to refrain.
I didn’t think it was that confusing but apparently something he wrote made it so for multiple people.
01-20-2019, 04:47 PM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Originally Posted by ToddChavez
Enjoy that carpet dance at the GO when they see you intentionally flying CI100 every leg.
Personally now that we are out of section 6, I won't be doing 2 engine taxi or flying a high CI unless we are late or for safety reasons. I want my airline to be profitable and successful.
If you think they aren't monitoring individual fuel burns, you'd be dead wrong.
Personally now that we are out of section 6, I won't be doing 2 engine taxi or flying a high CI unless we are late or for safety reasons. I want my airline to be profitable and successful.
If you think they aren't monitoring individual fuel burns, you'd be dead wrong.
01-20-2019, 05:00 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Position: FL
Posts: 375
Originally Posted by Big E 757
You won’t be doing any of that because you aren’t actually a pilot for Frontier, remember? And a CI of 100 is actually a high cost index. At least on the Airbii I fly. That’ll get you .78-.79. A CI of less than 60 is a slower cost index.
Even 60 in most cases will cruise at .78 or higher
Our typical CI of 7 to 13 will most times be .78 headed west bound with a headwind
