Frontier passenger arrested Easter weekend
Does anyone know what the truth is on this story?
Apparently, a woman requests the flight attendant to re-seat a her and her daughter because their seats have fresh vomit from a previous flight, which is now on the daughter's hands and clothes. Flight attendent refuses to re-seat them. Instead, woman arrested and charged with misdemeanor trespass. What really happened? edit: (LAS to RDU on Easter weekend) |
You couldn’t have googled this?
"During boarding of flight 2066 from McCarran International Airport (LAS) to Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) last week, two passengers told the flight attendants that vomit was present in their seat area. The flight attendants apologized and immediately invited the mother and her teenage daughter to move to either end of the plane so that the seat area could be cleaned. The mother and daughter were also told that once boarding was complete they would be provided other seats if available. The daughter was also offered cleaning products and invited to use the lavatory to wash up. The mother was unsatisfied with the response and became disruptive. As a result, the flight attendants determined that the mother and daughter should be deplaned and accommodated on another flight. The mother refused, and following procedure, law enforcement was called. Law enforcement then requested that everyone deplane so that the mother and daughter could be removed allowing the aircraft to be re-boarded and depart. We apologized to our passengers for the inconvenience caused by the departure delay. The safety of passengers and crew is our top priority at Frontier." |
Originally Posted by Powderkeg
(Post 2809172)
You couldn’t have googled this?
"During boarding of flight 2066 from McCarran International Airport (LAS) to Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) last week, two passengers told the flight attendants that vomit was present in their seat area. The flight attendants apologized and immediately invited the mother and her teenage daughter to move to either end of the plane so that the seat area could be cleaned. The mother and daughter were also told that once boarding was complete they would be provided other seats if available. The daughter was also offered cleaning products and invited to use the lavatory to wash up. The mother was unsatisfied with the response and became disruptive. As a result, the flight attendants determined that the mother and daughter should be deplaned and accommodated on another flight. The mother refused, and following procedure, law enforcement was called. Law enforcement then requested that everyone deplane so that the mother and daughter could be removed allowing the aircraft to be re-boarded and depart. We apologized to our passengers for the inconvenience caused by the departure delay. The safety of passengers and crew is our top priority at Frontier." |
See what happens when it goes to trial. On the other hand, if it DOESN’T go to trial, that would tell us something too. But seriously, even if the mother is a total jerk, how do you miss cleaning up vomit on a seat before you let customers board an aircraft?
|
Thank you, Captain Obvious Powderkeg. You have saved the day by presenting Frontier's official corporate description of the incident which I have read on almost every news outlet.
|
Originally Posted by FAASTER
(Post 2809366)
Thank you, Captain Obvious Powderkeg. You have saved the day by presenting Frontier's official corporate description of the incident which I have read on almost every news outlet.
We have almost 1500 pilots, and you want the information that only 2 can give? |
[QUOTE=FAASTER;2809366]Thank you, Captain Obvious Powderkeg. You have saved the day by presenting Frontier's official corporate description of the incident which I have read on almost every news outlet.
She was arrested that also tells us something she obviously pushed it that far with the police. If she was bad enough the police arrested her, I can only imagine how she was treating the flight attendants. |
Originally Posted by FAASTER
(Post 2809366)
Thank you, Captain Obvious Powderkeg. You have saved the day by presenting Frontier's official corporate description of the incident which I have read on almost every news outlet.
In all seriousness...in this instance and any other news story where it’s “airline v. passenger” you have two sides to the story and then what really happened. But many passengers are looking for 15 minutes of fame and/or react poorly in these situations; more often than not the company press release more closely aligns with the truth, hence my cut/paste of the company position. |
Google “frontier vomit arrest”
You get about 30 pages of bad advertising for Frontier. At this point the reality hardly matters, the airline gets a black eye. This is the sort of stuff that people are seeing nationwide: https://m.facebook.com/lynette.lipke...16470097362779 No way this couldn’t have been better handled. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2809609)
Google “frontier vomit arrest”
You get about 30 pages of bad advertising for Frontier. At this point the reality hardly matters, the airline gets a black eye. This is the sort of stuff that people are seeing nationwide: https://m.facebook.com/lynette.lipke...16470097362779 No way this couldn’t have been better handled. |
Originally Posted by PulledBreaker
(Post 2809443)
How about it's none of your ****ing business? Better?
We have almost 1500 pilots, and you want the information that only 2 can give? |
Originally Posted by FAASTER
(Post 2809676)
Yes, I do. I would like as much information as possible that isn't known by the public.
They were on hold with Mx control and didn't know anything about it. |
Originally Posted by Powderkeg
(Post 2809591)
You’re welcome, happy to help.
In all seriousness...in this instance and any other news story where it’s “airline v. passenger” you have two sides to the story and then what really happened. But many passengers are looking for 15 minutes of fame and/or react poorly in these situations; more often than not the company press release more closely aligns with the truth, hence my cut/paste of the company position. |
The legal term is res ipsa loquitor. It means “the thing speaks for itself.”
Basically, you lose the PR argument at “there was vomit on the seat...”and whatever happens after that point becomes secondary to the fact that customers don’t expect there to be vomit on their assigned seat when they board an airplane. It’s Customer Service 101, and airlines are a customer service industry. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2809805)
It’s Customer Service 101, and AIRLINES are a customer service industry. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2809609)
Google “frontier vomit arrest”
https://m.facebook.com/lynette.lipke...16470097362779 No way this couldn’t have been better handled. |
Originally Posted by FAASTER
(Post 2809708)
Hey, I understand. We only have fragments of videos and social media posts by other passengers to rely on. You provided what made the most sense. Media has a way of distorting truth. Sorry for my bit of snarkitude.
|
Originally Posted by ReserveCA
(Post 2809807)
Holding companies that fly A/C couldn’t give a %#$&@!
|
It’s Customer Service 101, and airlines are a customer service industry.[/QUOTE]
Actually the airlines are a “transportation industry”. When you buy a ticket you should expect to get from point A to point B alive. Everything else is just fluff.! Also - not only did they arrest the woman - they took the 14 yo daughter into child protective custody for the 12 hours she was in jail. You have to really **** of a Vegas airport Cop to make them arrest you. Those guys are “senior mamas” and it’s considered pretty gravy train as far as the Po Po goes. |
Originally Posted by madmax757
(Post 2810130)
Actually the airlines are a “transportation industry”. When you buy a ticket you should expect to get from point A to point B alive. Everything else is just fluff.!
https://liveandletsfly.boardingarea....tomer-service/ If you think this episode does anything but hurt Frontier, then you are greatly mistaken Also - not only did they arrest the woman - they took the 14 yo daughter into child protective custody for the 12 hours she was in jail. You have to really **** of a Vegas airport Cop to make them arrest you. Those guys are “senior mamas” and it’s considered pretty gravy train as far as the Po Po goes. https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/28/opini...los/index.html Frontier lost the battle at “puddle of vomit on seat...” |
Airlines used to be only about safe, reliable transportation.
Now that’s generally assumed, and so here’s a flight crew today: :D https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fZfP4RNAh28 |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2810146)
Nope. Even the United CEO is worried about the sort of damage that adverse PR is going to do to the industry, and the sort of customer protection legislation or FAA rules that might come from it.
https://liveandletsfly.boardingarea....tomer-service/ If you think this episode does anything but hurt Frontier, then you are greatly mistaken It doesn’t matter. Technically, Dr. Dao was probably in the right. He wound up with a generous settlement from United anyway: https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/28/opini...los/index.html Frontier lost the battle at “puddle of vomit on seat...” |
Originally Posted by ASpilot2be
(Post 2810172)
People are gonna forget about this whole thing next week, and people will forget it for cheap fares. So they may lose for a week, then back to normal.
In your dreams. A few well publicized incidents and this is where we are heading: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...bill/1418/text An excerpt: (2) the passenger’s arrival at the passenger's destination is delayed by more than 4 hours after the originally scheduled arrival of the passenger, the air carrier— (A) to automatically refund to the passenger the amount the passenger paid for the ticket; (B) to find a seat for the passenger on another flight operated by the air carrier, on a flight operated by another air carrier, or on an alternative means of transportation, at no additional expense to the passenger, at the earliest available opportunity, if the passenger so chooses; (C) to provide compensation to the passenger of $1,350 cash; and (D) to provide a passenger with an amount equal to the cost of a meal; and (3) the passenger's departure is delayed until the next day, the air carrier to provide the passenger with an amount equal to the cost of hotel lodging, in addition to the requirements of paragraph (2). The fact the Senate minority leader didn’t have the votes to get it out of committee last year doesn’t mean he won’t this year, if a few more prominent incidents occur. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2810181)
In your dreams. A few well publicized incidents and this is where we are heading:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...bill/1418/text An excerpt: And this is one of the lesser problematic things in the bill. The fact the Senate minority leader didn’t have the votes to get it out of committee last year doesn’t mean he won’t this year, if a few more prominent incidents occur. |
Originally Posted by ASpilot2be
(Post 2810186)
I dont see anywhere in there does it say if someone is acting a fool and causing a security issue that we can't take them off. There is no way that would pass.
And an FA or even a cockpit crew member trying to tamp down that anger by calling it that, is simply crying wolf. Crew members were given rather enormous discretion along those lines after 9/11. Abusing that discretion is the surest way possible to lose that discretion. And as for the senator’s bill, there is PLENTY in it that would affect the airlines, their procedures, their concern for customer service, and for damn sure their profitability. You need to read it more fully. This part alone would cost most airlines millions of dollars a month. So much for profit sharing: SEC. 102. MINIMUM COMPENSATION PROVIDED TO PASSENGERS INVOLUNTARILY DENIED BOARDING. (a) In General.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the regulations under part 250 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations— (1) to eliminate the dollar amount limitations under paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsections (a) and (b) of section 250.5 of such title on the amount of compensation that may be provided to a passenger who is denied boarding involuntarily from an oversold flight; and (2) to establish that an air carrier shall provide compensation to each such passenger of not less than $1,350 per flight. (b) Termination.—Part 250 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, shall terminate on the date on which the regulations required by section 101(a) take effect. Every cloud apparently has a silver lining...if you look hard enough for it. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2810181)
In your dreams. A few well publicized incidents and this is where we are heading:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...bill/1418/text An excerpt: And this is one of the lesser problematic things in the bill. The fact the Senate minority leader didn’t have the votes to get it out of committee last year doesn’t mean he won’t this year, if a few more prominent incidents occur. Anyhow I’m not sure why this is becoming such a big deal. I’m sure F9 made mistakes, hopefully they learn from those mistakes. Every time throw up has happened on my legs it’s handled properly. All we can do is move on, and see how it all shakes out. The lady obviously did something bad enough for the cops to arrest her, that says enough for me. Like was said before, this will be an afterthought in week to two weeks. |
Thanks for understanding.
|
Originally Posted by SFA320
(Post 2810199)
Bills like this pop up every year it seems, but like this one they don’t get far. Airlines aren’t going to allow BS like this get passed. They pay the right people make sure of it.
Really? https://thehill.com/policy/transport...seat-size-rule https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...aa/2003043002/ |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2811612)
Really?
https://thehill.com/policy/transport...seat-size-rule https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...aa/2003043002/ And yet here we are. Nothing has changed. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2810146)
.......
It doesn’t matter. Technically, Dr. Dao was probably in the right. He wound up with a generous settlement from United anyway: https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/28/opini...los/index.html Frontier lost the battle at “puddle of vomit on seat...” Technically, Dr Dao was criminally wrong. After voluntarily deplaning, he illegally and without clearance ran down the jetway and reboarded. Now there was plenty of “wrong” occurring on all sides of the equation, but the doctor was not “right” or innocent. United settled in attempt to bury the situation. I agree that Frontier most likely lost the battle at “puddle of vomit on seat.” |
Originally Posted by ipdanno
(Post 2812470)
Technically, Dr Dao was criminally wrong. After voluntarily deplaning, he illegally and without clearance ran down the jetway and reboarded. Now there was plenty of “wrong” occurring on all sides of the equation, but the doctor was not “right” or innocent. United settled in attempt to bury the situation.
I agree that Frontier most likely lost the battle at “puddle of vomit on seat.” |
Originally Posted by V1 McFlyerson
(Post 2813038)
“Frontier and a puddle of vomit” has a really nice ring to it.
Delta and Cognac, AA and ?, United and beatings, Alaska and going nowhere, Southwest and the garbage bag, to complete the list. |
The silver lining here is that it takes 10 results before the Google serach result headlines mention that she's Black. Normally, the color of her skin would be the headline and this would have been inescapable front page news. I only heard about it from APC.
Must be a fast news week. :D |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 2815190)
The silver lining here is that it takes 10 results before the Google serach result headlines mention that she's Black. Normally, the color of her skin would be the headline and this would have been inescapable front page news. I only heard about it from APC.
Must be a fast news week. :D |
Originally Posted by ipdanno
(Post 2812470)
Technically, Dr Dao was criminally wrong. After voluntarily deplaning, he illegally and without clearance ran down the jetway and reboarded. Now there was plenty of “wrong” occurring on all sides of the equation, but the doctor was not “right” or innocent. United settled in attempt to bury the situation.
I agree that Frontier most likely lost the battle at “puddle of vomit on seat.” |
I’ve heard from FAs that it was the Lady’s daughter that vomited and when the flight attendants gave her stuff to clean it up, that’s when the show started. That’s probably why it didn’t get the staying power it could have. Rumors are fun!
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands