Loads were good today
06-09-2020, 08:06 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Originally Posted by Bravo3
I could care less about the masks. Thankful for the business and thankful to have a job. Thankful that it looks very promising for our airline. Thankful that I’m here compared to a legacy. Given the situation, thankful for a lot.
And damn thankful for our loads! Just flew a turn, 66% there and 77% back.
And damn thankful for our loads! Just flew a turn, 66% there and 77% back.
06-09-2020, 01:34 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Originally Posted by sobo
I don’t think we’re out of the water quite yet, but seeing that the July schedules are nearly double the size of June makes me feel a bit better. MCO had ~33 lines in June and about ~68 in July.
06-10-2020, 01:10 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Originally Posted by itsnotme
Any idea if they letting non-revs on above that number?
All my recent flights have had a lot of no shows though. Our flight was sold to 171 with a 162 cap. We left with 150 on board
06-10-2020, 04:27 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 297
From what I was led to believe, “NO” pax above 162. Any nonrevs above that number must be eligible for, and occupy jumpseats. Was actually talking to someone that had this happen to them. I guess it was booked above 162. All checked in with nonrevs, but, ultimately there were enough no shows that everyone got on.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
