New loans ?
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 663
Nice- calling people trash. And cities trash. Well because it’s cool to say that today right?
It’s a loan- you know a thing that has to be repaid. Kinda like your first mortgage. Which, when you don’t put down 20%, you need to pay insurance and is all backed by the government. Kinda like this loan.
but I’m sure in your day you bought your house in cash and don’t relay on the government for anything!
It’s a loan- you know a thing that has to be repaid. Kinda like your first mortgage. Which, when you don’t put down 20%, you need to pay insurance and is all backed by the government. Kinda like this loan.
but I’m sure in your day you bought your house in cash and don’t relay on the government for anything!
#12
#13
#14
Does anyone have the latest on Frontier's share of the loan money? How much and have we taken the money yet? American just cashed out on their loan, so I'm wondering if we (or either of the other two airlines that signed letters of intent) have done the same.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,423
According to this the loans have closed.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
Those are separate loans associated with the original CARES act, but not the grants that restrict furloughs. And technically, since our union agreed to allow COLA-0, they’re not actually furloughing anyone.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,341
And with the above new term, regardless of what the loans are or are not associated with, is there another purpose that the company has to accept money OTHER than to pay those employees? Is that money to go toward aircraft leases? Gate fees? Into the pocket of Franke to recoup losses already experienced?
What other reason could be more important than paying labor that just got laid off (w/ a few benefits)?
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
I love how we've turned the COLA-0 thing into a non-furlough. Yes, you are correct. Because the pilots who receive NO PAY still maintain health, flight and a few other benefits, they are technically not furloughed. How about we go with employees who aren't paid...
And with the above new term, regardless of what the loans are or are not associated with, is there another purpose that the company has to accept money OTHER than to pay those employees? Is that money to go toward aircraft leases? Gate fees? Into the pocket of Franke to recoup losses already experienced?
What other reason could be more important than paying labor that just got laid off (w/ a few benefits)?
And with the above new term, regardless of what the loans are or are not associated with, is there another purpose that the company has to accept money OTHER than to pay those employees? Is that money to go toward aircraft leases? Gate fees? Into the pocket of Franke to recoup losses already experienced?
What other reason could be more important than paying labor that just got laid off (w/ a few benefits)?
And the original CARES loans, that we now know they accepted, are just loans with good terms; there are no protections for labor. The company won’t be taking on additional loan debt to keep paying pilots to not fly unless it’s in the company’s near-term financial interests to do so. Good-will is so far down their list it’s irrelevant. And it appears the company is doing everything on a conservative near-term strategy, which might be the best long-term job insurance our pilot group could hope for right now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EMmariano
Flight Schools and Training
7
03-06-2009 05:24 PM