Applying at F9 is like applying at Allegiant
03-14-2021, 09:55 AM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by Notarealpilot
As long as FC view works I don’t care what we use.
03-14-2021, 09:08 PM
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by Powderkeg
Except the 737...it’s not cost efficient.
It’s sad to see something as long lived as the Cessna SkyChicken still out performing 121 service.
03-15-2021, 05:34 AM
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 663
Originally Posted by DrJekyll MrHyde
Had they pulled off the MAX version of the 737 airframe without software induced fatalities it would have been incredibly cost efficient. Nothing like using the majority of the same tools and jigs to produce essentially the same airframe for nearly five decades. The first moon landing came after the first 737 flight.
It’s sad to see something as long lived as the Cessna SkyChicken still out performing 121 service.
It’s sad to see something as long lived as the Cessna SkyChicken still out performing 121 service.
03-18-2021, 06:26 AM
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 461
Is this BL's clever way of reducing the value of our CBA by getting the pilots to pay for their own hotels vs the company? I don't know anything about building a route/system structure. Will our structure and utilization be substantially different with this model?
There was an article posted somewhere that included the leasing cost of our facilities in USVI and I was shocked how cheap it was. Like less than 2,000 a month I believe. Are all of these bases exponentially cheaper to service than hotels for crews? If they're going to pay us "market rate" then let's have them pay to move or pay retail for their own hotels?
Just dumb rhetorical questions.
There was an article posted somewhere that included the leasing cost of our facilities in USVI and I was shocked how cheap it was. Like less than 2,000 a month I believe. Are all of these bases exponentially cheaper to service than hotels for crews? If they're going to pay us "market rate" then let's have them pay to move or pay retail for their own hotels?
Just dumb rhetorical questions.
03-18-2021, 08:26 AM
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by V1 McFlyerson
Is this BL's clever way of reducing the value of our CBA by getting the pilots to pay for their own hotels vs the company? I don't know anything about building a route/system structure. Will our structure and utilization be substantially different with this model?
There was an article posted somewhere that included the leasing cost of our facilities in USVI and I was shocked how cheap it was. Like less than 2,000 a month I believe. Are all of these bases exponentially cheaper to service than hotels for crews? If they're going to pay us "market rate" then let's have them pay to move or pay retail for their own hotels?
Just dumb rhetorical questions.
There was an article posted somewhere that included the leasing cost of our facilities in USVI and I was shocked how cheap it was. Like less than 2,000 a month I believe. Are all of these bases exponentially cheaper to service than hotels for crews? If they're going to pay us "market rate" then let's have them pay to move or pay retail for their own hotels?
Just dumb rhetorical questions.
03-19-2021, 06:13 AM
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 663
Originally Posted by V1 McFlyerson
Is this BL's clever way of reducing the value of our CBA by getting the pilots to pay for their own hotels vs the company? I don't know anything about building a route/system structure. Will our structure and utilization be substantially different with this model?
There was an article posted somewhere that included the leasing cost of our facilities in USVI and I was shocked how cheap it was. Like less than 2,000 a month I believe. Are all of these bases exponentially cheaper to service than hotels for crews? If they're going to pay us "market rate" then let's have them pay to move or pay retail for their own hotels?
Just dumb rhetorical questions.
There was an article posted somewhere that included the leasing cost of our facilities in USVI and I was shocked how cheap it was. Like less than 2,000 a month I believe. Are all of these bases exponentially cheaper to service than hotels for crews? If they're going to pay us "market rate" then let's have them pay to move or pay retail for their own hotels?
Just dumb rhetorical questions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
