Search
Notices

Contract 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2023, 04:34 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker View Post
Yup. There has to be a contractual time. I’ll buy the argument of moving the time later a bit but removing it completely is a bad idea. We had a loa that did just that in the last agreement and it was a complete disaster that had to be withdrawn. You need to force it to premium at some point. Especially considering premium should get fixed to a more equitable distribution in a new agreement.
I don’t know if I really agree with moving it later. I think if they’re below Min reserve coverage for that day it should be mandatory premium. If FLICA won’t let you drop/swap a trip because it’s “below Min reserve coverage” then trips on those days after 9:30 should be premium.

But I 100% agree that the system of premium distribution absolutely needs to change.
AlternateLaw is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 04:37 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,091
Default

Originally Posted by AlternateLaw View Post
I don’t know if I really agree with moving it later. I think if they’re below Min reserve coverage for that day it should be mandatory premium.

But I 100% agree that the system of premium distribution absolutely needs to change.
It was 11am in 2 previous agreements ago. Either way the ability to pick up straight time needs to stop before res assignments.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 04:49 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,091
Default

Originally Posted by AlternateLaw View Post
I don’t know if I really agree with moving it later. I think if they’re below Min reserve coverage for that day it should be mandatory premium. If FLICA won’t let you drop/swap a trip because it’s “below Min reserve coverage” then trips on those days after 9:30 should be premium.

But I 100% agree that the system of premium distribution absolutely needs to change.
I had to think about that for a second because I like the idea. The problem would be if you can’t drop or swap how would you pickup? They’re not going to allow a drop then pick right back up at premium. If you had the day off and there’s few res it’s probably going to premium anyhow. Not sure that provision would work well enough to make it worth while. Focus on even distribution of premium. Keep it at 930 or move to 11 but if you want to move to 11 you now want something that’s basically worthless imo.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 05:00 PM
  #104  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker View Post
I had to think about that for a second because I like the idea. The problem would be if you can’t drop or swap how would you pickup? They’re not going to allow a drop then pick right back up at premium. If you had the day off and there’s few res it’s probably going to premium anyhow. Not sure that provision would work well enough to make it worth while. Focus on even distribution of premium. Keep it at 930 or move to 11 but if you want to move to 11 you now want something that’s basically worthless imo.
Yeah. I guess what i was getting at was if they won’t let you drop/swap something because the grid isn’t green (or it’s already at red) then maybe trips in open time after 09:30 should bypass reserves altogether, and just be mandatory premium at that point

Not sure honestly I’m just thinking out loud
AlternateLaw is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 05:07 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,091
Default

Originally Posted by AlternateLaw View Post
Yeah. I guess what i was getting at was if they won’t let you drop/swap something because the grid isn’t green (or it’s already at red) then maybe trips in open time after 09:30 should bypass reserves altogether, and just be mandatory premium at that point

Not sure honestly I’m just thinking out loud
placed in the equitable premium folder. We could just get rid of res altogether. Lol. You’re on the right track. That system would reduce required res % a bit.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 05:14 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,345
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker View Post
Especially considering premium should get fixed to a more equitable distribution in a new agreement.
Why?

Seriously, why should the COMPANY expend time/effort/money making sure Premium is more equally distributed?
dracir1 is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 05:45 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,091
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
Why?

Seriously, why should the COMPANY expend time/effort/money making sure Premium is more equally distributed?
It won’t cost them $ or effort. Only time.10ish mins. I’m pretty sure you’ll be outnumbered on no change to current book on premium distribution.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 03-01-2023, 11:30 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TOGALOCK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by BufordT Justice View Post
You’d think shelling out $2.5 MILLION per month in new hire bonuses would threaten the business model, but I guess not.
Heres the sad part though, it’s not costing them 2.5 million. The majority of those “bonuses” are being paid back to the company when the new hire leaves in their first year. So, that scheme may keep a few people around and it will cost F9 a little bit of money, but they’re getting a lot of it back.

The whole point of the “bonus” program is to keep a few more people around that otherwise might not stay. Every person that stays is a sliver of time more that the company can push off coming forward with a contract. The company knows what their break even point is on “bonus” payouts vs. new contract. What that is, I don’t know. We’ll have a better idea when they finally come to the table.
TOGALOCK is online now  
Old 03-02-2023, 04:19 AM
  #109  
Last To Know First To Go
 
TurboFanMan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 604
Default

CBT pay for training needs to be fixed! This study for 5 hrs and get paid half is crap or whatever it is. Every crew member should get paid their hourly rate for CBT training. My time is worth my hourly rate, and that should include CBT training.
TurboFanMan is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 04:22 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 681
Default

Originally Posted by TurboFanMan View Post
CBT pay for training needs to be fixed! This study for 5 hrs and get paid half is crap or whatever it is. Every crew member should get paid their hourly rate for CBT training. My time is worth my hourly rate, and that should include CBT training.
Also, not sure why we agreed to allow training pairings to be exempt from trip rig rules. Schedules are killed during training months, especially for those outside of DEN as a 3-5 day pairing clogs up your month at a whopping 12-15 hours of credit.
turbojet28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices