Search
Notices

Contract 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2023, 05:08 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Originally Posted by HSCompressor View Post
Our 600s have more seats than a delta 767.
https://www.delta.com/us/en/aircraft/boeing/767-400er

Regionals are paying a fortune to 50 seat RJ guys.

Forget stupid jetblew. 767 rates.
Just to throw out a piece of information: at Delta the 767 and the A321 are pay banded together.

The A320/B737 are a slightly lower pay rate.
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 05:08 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 663
Default

Originally Posted by Planedrive View Post
1.25% over 82 is something we need to keep.
As BB said “our pilots out earn Delta pilots”. Let’s hold him to that in this round of negotiations!
Contrary to popular opinion I think this is something that needs to go. It’s a valuable piece of negotiating capital, and if the rates are high enough you’ll never notice. This would also drive more open time, more pilots required to staff the high utilization rates, and a QOL improvement for anybody that decided they could afford to work less.

Imagine a world in which you didn’t have to credit 100 hours a month with 12 days off to feel like you can buy a Miata that’s as nice as your neighbor’s that flies for Delta.
Powderkeg is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 05:10 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Originally Posted by PositiveRate20 View Post
Pay rates etc are a no-brainer. Contract enforcement, more self-help language, and streamlined grievance resolution are musts that few people mention.
Not sure that "more self help language" is a thing unless I misunderstood what you mean.

A more streamlined grievence process is definitely a must, and I believe that's a top priority for the union. So that's good
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 05:12 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg View Post
Contrary to popular opinion I think this is something that needs to go. It’s a valuable piece of negotiating capital, and if the rates are high enough you’ll never notice. This would also drive more open time, more pilots required to staff the high utilization rates, and a QOL improvement for anybody that decided they could afford to work less.
I have mixed feelings on the 125% over 82 provision. I believe its unique to us?

Obviously it does allow hard workers (*****s) to make big bucks, but it also allows the company to carry less total pilots. Kind of a mixed bag in my mind
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 05:17 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 29
Default

Im for removing the over 82 incentive and having it translate to higher hourly rates instead!
Buspilot99 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 05:51 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2021
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
Not sure that "more self help language" is a thing unless I misunderstood what you mean.

A more streamlined grievence process is definitely a must, and I believe that's a top priority for the union. So that's good
More instances and leeway where the pilot can contractually resolve an issue without having to rely on the company to do so. Ie no hotel van, no hotel room, etc
PositiveRate20 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 05:59 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Originally Posted by PositiveRate20 View Post
More instances and leeway where the pilot can contractually resolve an issue without having to rely on the company to do so. Ie no hotel van, no hotel room, etc
Gotcha. Makes sense.

I was thinking "self help" ie being released to self help as in a strike
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 06:08 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,347
Default

I will say…

This thread in its entirety is a bad idea. All of the info shared here SHOULD be private information sent to your local reps. That’s it. Let the NC do their job…

I will mention, however, that it’s surprising how low some people are willing to accept…Jet Blue rates? Really?

What this thread should be about is generating momentum for those who are expecting to compare the new TA that we eventually get to the existing contract we have now. That is a silly expectation.

We should be comparing the new TA to the conditions that exist NOW (or will exist after everyone else has their contracts) in the industry. Let’s not fall into the trap of the last contract vote…
dracir1 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 06:31 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1 View Post
I will say…

This thread in its entirety is a bad idea. All of the info shared here SHOULD be private information sent to your local reps. That’s it. Let the NC do their job…

I will mention, however, that it’s surprising how low some people are willing to accept…Jet Blue rates? Really?

What this thread should be about is generating momentum for those who are expecting to compare the new TA that we eventually get to the existing contract we have now. That is a silly expectation.

We should be comparing the new TA to the conditions that exist NOW (or will exist after everyone else has their contracts) in the industry. Let’s not fall into the trap of the last contract vote…
As I explained in a previous post, we will be negotiating off of all the other industry contracts. Pattern bargaining. We will be the last to go and will almost certainly have every other airlines new contract to compare to and bargain off of.

We aren't exactly spilling secrets to management here.

As for the JetBlue rates... yeah. By the time we get this thing done, they will be at $340/ hour. From our future top rate of $270 plus all the other gains I want, it's a floor to go off of. Throw in improvements to LTD, 401K DC %, soft pay, min day, etc and you are looking at reality.

The only thing that could happen that would dramatically change the landscape would be United, AA and Southwest leapfroging Delta and then Spirit/ JetBlue getting a better JCBA before we reach a TA. If that happens, then yes, my $340 rate won't be high enough. But if Delta remains the top of the industry and Spirit/ JetBlue don't have a higher JCBA, $340 is reasonable.

We will have a lot of other contracts to compare to when it comes time. United, AA and Southwest need to get their sh|t together and get good contracts.
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 07:43 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyingR6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: F9 FO
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg View Post
Contrary to popular opinion I think this is something that needs to go. It’s a valuable piece of negotiating capital, and if the rates are high enough you’ll never notice. This would also drive more open time, more pilots required to staff the high utilization rates, and a QOL improvement for anybody that decided they could afford to work less.

Imagine a world in which you didn’t have to credit 100 hours a month with 12 days off to feel like you can buy a Miata that’s as nice as your neighbor’s that flies for Delta.
***Michael Scott "Thank you!" gif. ***
FlyingR6 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices