Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Bedford assesses Southwest's bid for Frontier >

Bedford assesses Southwest's bid for Frontier

Search
Notices

Bedford assesses Southwest's bid for Frontier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2009, 05:53 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
320ToBearz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 361
Default

Originally Posted by CANAM View Post
It's not a state issue. It's federal.
You obviously do not understand how our government works. Those state FEDERAL politicians (congressman and senators) call in favors to the DoJ and poof, its approved.
320ToBearz is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 05:54 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
He sure seems to be growing Midwest.
indeed.... MKE-LAX for starters. What an astute observation you made.
sizzlechest is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 06:28 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320
Posts: 103
Default

"Now RAH is in a similar situation and everyone wants to point fingers and blame RAH pilots. Who knows if this will all work for RAH, the chances are pretty slim, but if it does maybe someday RAH will be one of the "great" places to work"

Not a good comparison, RAH flies regional jets, SWA flew and still flies narrow-body mainline jets.
F9er is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 06:35 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
YXnot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 306
Default

Originally Posted by sizzlechest View Post
indeed.... MKE-LAX for starters. What an astute observation you made.
Thats funny, MKE-LAX was the first route I flew for MEH over 10 years ago.
Whats the crew cost on that 190 again? Pitiful.
Just curious SIZZLER, what routes were you flying in the late 90's?

Don't worry, I came through the C concourse yesterday afternoon. It looked just like D from several years ago. The damage is done. Southwests arrival is the final nail.

Good Luck
YXnot is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 04:54 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CANAM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: 1986 LeBaron Convertable
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by 320ToBearz View Post
You obviously do not understand how our government works. Those state FEDERAL politicians (congressman and senators) call in favors to the DoJ and poof, its approved.
I sincerely appreciate your civics lesson, but call me less than sold when you choose to use "poof" as a part of your debate. I'm obviously not as well rounded in the structure of the government as you, and I appoligise.
CANAM is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 07:31 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilot124's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by F9er View Post
"Now RAH is in a similar situation and everyone wants to point fingers and blame RAH pilots. Who knows if this will all work for RAH, the chances are pretty slim, but if it does maybe someday RAH will be one of the "great" places to work"

Not a good comparison, RAH flies regional jets, SWA flew and still flies narrow-body mainline jets.
What would you call the EMB190? You are right on one thing though it is not a good comparison. At RAH you don't have to buy the 170/175/190 type rating to work there.
pilot124 is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 08:05 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by pilot124 View Post
What would you call the EMB190? You are right on one thing though it is not a good comparison. At RAH you don't have to buy the 170/175/190 type rating to work there.
True, you just pay for it on the installment plan with reduced compensation.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 08:17 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by pilot124 View Post
What would you call the EMB190? You are right on one thing though it is not a good comparison. At RAH you don't have to buy the 170/175/190 type rating to work there.
You have one 190, I wouldn't get to far ahead of myself in thinking you are sitting on a gold mine.

I think you are kidding, a rational person wouldn't make that kind of comparison. Right?
F9er is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:34 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Default

either way you look at it, you F9 drivers need someone to get u out of bankruptcy. But, u better hope its RAH cause you'll atleast keep your jobs. With SWA your Gone! your kidding yourselves if you think they are going to operate you seperate or even keep the pilots around. Even with the ****ty rates you still would have a job.
GAPILOT36 is offline  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:49 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: Right 737
Posts: 85
Default

SWAPA fought to keep the Morris guys, as the right thing to do. They will do it again for the F9 guys. If SWA wins the August 10th auction, F9 will most likely operate for a couple years as they are now. We (SWA) are in the middle of our RNP transition (the final stage which will take a lot of seat / sim time in the big-D), once that is complete (Q4 '10 ish), and once the economy turns around we'll see WN take off again with regards to growth.

Once that happens, we'll have an asset of 700 plus "Southwest" pilots to draw into the fold. I figure once the integration starts, it'll probably happen rapidly. Dunno on Lynx nor the SWA poolies. This is all JMHO.

If F9 guys would rather accept the RAH bid, just let your Union Prez know.

I am gonna sit and wait, there is little I can do, but vote my conscience.
Kdog18 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brownie
Cargo
7
05-27-2009 06:50 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
234
02-12-2009 09:31 AM
Lester Burnham
Cargo
29
02-11-2009 02:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices