Can we continue this conversation in a civil manor? Looks like we're going to get a chance to vote. As of right now, I'm leaning towards a yes vote.
How about this BOD is giving away our negotiating rights under LOA 67 A 2&3? I know it's in hopes of something, but why??? I'm sure Biffle is laughing at this BOD more and more. |
Originally Posted by Missed Appch
(Post 2104217)
Can we continue this conversation in a civil manor? Looks like we're going to get a chance to vote. As of right now, I'm leaning towards a yes vote.
How about this BOD is giving away our negotiating rights under LOA 67 A 2&3? I know it's in hopes of something, but why??? I'm sure Biffle is laughing at this BOD more and more. |
Originally Posted by MtnPeakCruiser
(Post 2104238)
You're referring to same BOD that is receiving consultation from ALPA; it may have been ALPA's idea to pass on the immediate money grab outlined in LOA 67. ALPA is already involved in our negotiations, so I'd be careful about riding that ALPA unicorn to contract salvation. Although disappointing, it may prove to be the arguably right decision. We can't say until we have a new signed contract.
|
Originally Posted by sulkair
(Post 2104334)
I guess you're saying it might be better to get nothing now, and have more leverage in section 6 because of it?
|
Originally Posted by MtnPeakCruiser
(Post 2104348)
No, it's not about leverage. It's about tying up the company with a seperate set of negotiations over language in LOA 67 hoping for a quick money grab, and maybe it works and maybe it doesn't. It certainly would have stalled negotiations on a new contract. If the new contract takes 4 years to negotiate then you could argue it would have been worthwhile to have those LOA 67 pay bump talks. On the other hand, if it takes 1 year to negotiate a new contract with significant pay raises then it was obviously a smart move.
|
Did I just hear you guys signed an LOA that says you guys "supercede" all other pilots from the other airline?
Hahahahahahahahahaah |
Originally Posted by VegassBus
(Post 2104489)
Did I just hear you guys signed an LOA that says you guys "supercede" all other pilots from the other airline?
Hahahahahahahahahaah |
Originally Posted by Missed Appch
(Post 2104632)
What are you talking about? I've heard nothing of the sort.
|
Originally Posted by MtnPeakCruiser
(Post 2104348)
No, it's not about leverage. It's about tying up the company with a seperate set of negotiations over language in LOA 67 hoping for a quick money grab, and maybe it works and maybe it doesn't. It certainly would have stalled negotiations on a new contract. If the new contract takes 4 years to negotiate then you could argue it would have been worthwhile to have those LOA 67 pay bump talks. On the other hand, if it takes 1 year to negotiate a new contract with significant pay raises then it was obviously a smart move.
|
I get the feeling your negotiations as well as ours (Spirits) will be dragged out as long as possible. We will both make slight pogress then BOOM. Merger is announced and we start from scratch.
How was AA& Airways able to implement an LOA that had significantly higher payrates go into effect the day the Merger was official? That'd be nice for both groups |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands