Gojet Loses Another Federal Employment Case
11-01-2018, 07:07 PM
#21
Part of the problem
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: CRJ200 CA
Posts: 577
Originally Posted by Flogger
I recently flew with 2 FOs at 9E who were CAs at GoJet. They both went there for the promise of quick upgrade. They both upgraded quickly, but were almost exclusively flown as FOs, thus not logging any PIC time. They both had nearly the same horror stories about the training department and management. They both literally confirmed every story I've ever heard about GoJet.
They both left their CA positions at GoJet to be FOs at 9E.
That says quite a bit about GoJet.
They both left their CA positions at GoJet to be FOs at 9E.
That says quite a bit about GoJet.
Bumppity
B
11-08-2018, 04:19 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by WILLSFLYING
I have to wonder how little of a social life GoJet haters have to sit here and come up with this trash?
GoJet doesn't need to be defended. Who would you suggest it needs to be defended from? Uninformed folks like yourself who usually don't even get the name of the airline correct? Baseless accusations spewed by people who have never worked here?
I will ASSUME that you work for some sort of airline (or did). If you're reading the transcript of the trial, Mr. Harrison refers to "Paragraph 4" of an unidentified publication ( Perhaps the training guide)
This reading outlines the shortening of training in certain cases. Do you think that GoJet simply typed this up and unlocked the doors? Or do you think maybe, just maybe that the FSDO had a peek? Maybe?
At this point, Captain Bratcher may be trying to do the guy a "favor" and make training as brief as possible given his child at home. Perhaps right a wrong?
I am sure you probably know more than the Director of Operations at the company, the guy suing the company, pilots that have worked here for YEARS.
Gojet is doing great without your approval. Our pilots are great people. So, when I take offense to your uninformed blatherings, it is because a lot of folks here do an outstanding job.
But, thank you for letting us know about the company we work for. I am sure you will be a great source of information in the future. May I call on you for more questions you don't know the answer to?
GoJet doesn't need to be defended. Who would you suggest it needs to be defended from? Uninformed folks like yourself who usually don't even get the name of the airline correct? Baseless accusations spewed by people who have never worked here?
I will ASSUME that you work for some sort of airline (or did). If you're reading the transcript of the trial, Mr. Harrison refers to "Paragraph 4" of an unidentified publication ( Perhaps the training guide)
This reading outlines the shortening of training in certain cases. Do you think that GoJet simply typed this up and unlocked the doors? Or do you think maybe, just maybe that the FSDO had a peek? Maybe?
At this point, Captain Bratcher may be trying to do the guy a "favor" and make training as brief as possible given his child at home. Perhaps right a wrong?
I am sure you probably know more than the Director of Operations at the company, the guy suing the company, pilots that have worked here for YEARS.
Gojet is doing great without your approval. Our pilots are great people. So, when I take offense to your uninformed blatherings, it is because a lot of folks here do an outstanding job.
But, thank you for letting us know about the company we work for. I am sure you will be a great source of information in the future. May I call on you for more questions you don't know the answer to?
Bratcher did not request POI approval to put a pilot who was unlawfully terminated back to work with one sim ride, a sim check and a day of class because he never could have gotten it.
Who is Bratcher doing a favor for when he fires military reservists?
The fact is that nothing has changed as they keep trying to claim. I got to Gojet almost at the beginning and as of today, the only changes I see are the names and faces of the people who carry out the orders of Hulas.
Bratcher's replacement will talk about the new Gojet, but again, nothing will change. They don't want it to change.
11-09-2018, 11:25 AM
#23
On Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 21
Nothing ever changes at this place.
I believe this is the 5th "New and Improved Gojet".
Don't come hear because you won't have to commute. It is not worth it.
Don't come here because of any "bonus" because the "bonus" are spread out over time and merely offset lower pay. It's not worth it.
Don't come here because of a quick upgrade. It is not quick and it is not worth it.
There are good choices out there.
I believe this is the 5th "New and Improved Gojet".
Don't come hear because you won't have to commute. It is not worth it.
Don't come here because of any "bonus" because the "bonus" are spread out over time and merely offset lower pay. It's not worth it.
Don't come here because of a quick upgrade. It is not quick and it is not worth it.
There are good choices out there.
11-22-2018, 06:04 PM
#24
New Hire
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 6
Originally Posted by WILLSFLYING
I have to wonder how little of a social life GoJet haters have to sit here and come up with this trash? Bashing a new pilot for accepting a job based on your own hang-ups? How about congratulating them for getting to this point?
GoJet doesn't need to be defended. Who would you suggest it needs to be defended from? Uninformed folks like yourself who usually don't even get the name of the airline correct? Baseless accusations spewed by people who have never worked here?
I will ASSUME that you work for some sort of airline (or did). If you're reading the transcript of the trial, Mr. Harrison refers to "Paragraph 4" of an unidentified publication ( Perhaps the training guide)
Gojet is doing great without your approval.
Our new pilots are lucky to be here. If this isn't a good fit for them, they can move on. But, we have had pilots come here from almost every other regional because it wasn't a good fit there.
But, thank you for letting us know about the company we work for. I am sure you will be a great source of information in the future. May I call on you for more questions you don't know the answer to?
GoJet doesn't need to be defended. Who would you suggest it needs to be defended from? Uninformed folks like yourself who usually don't even get the name of the airline correct? Baseless accusations spewed by people who have never worked here?
I will ASSUME that you work for some sort of airline (or did). If you're reading the transcript of the trial, Mr. Harrison refers to "Paragraph 4" of an unidentified publication ( Perhaps the training guide)
Gojet is doing great without your approval.
Our new pilots are lucky to be here. If this isn't a good fit for them, they can move on. But, we have had pilots come here from almost every other regional because it wasn't a good fit there.
But, thank you for letting us know about the company we work for. I am sure you will be a great source of information in the future. May I call on you for more questions you don't know the answer to?
Please Will, you have the answers about why and how Gojet is so great for the rest of us. Fill us in so we don´t all have to panic and go look for a new job.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
