You might be a great pilot if...
#23
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: CA
Posts: 1,027
#26
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
So many people saying single engine IMC is a bad idea. Is this only under the conditions the OP described - single pilot night flying in hard IMC in icing conditions? (Heaven help the idiot who decides to leave the ground in a C172 into known IMC with temps anywhere near icing levels, day or not).
#28
So many people saying single engine IMC is a bad idea. Is this only under the conditions the OP described - single pilot night flying in hard IMC in icing conditions? (Heaven help the idiot who decides to leave the ground in a C172 into known IMC with temps anywhere near icing levels, day or not).
I will not do SE in IMC anymore, other than to possibly get out of a marine layer at the home drome where I know exactly when and where to turn for the engine-out landing spot.
I will not do SE at night unless the geography is very flat and the lighting sufficient to see what's on the ground (ie full moon).
I'm pretty certain I can achieve a good outcome with an EO LDG... as long as I can see where I'm going.
I'm probably not the only 121 veteran with this mentality. Of course GA for me is just recreation, so might as well go on a nice day otherwise it starts to feel like work.
#29
Personally...
I will not do SE in IMC anymore, other than to possibly get out of a marine layer at the home drome where I know exactly when and where to turn for the engine-out landing spot.
I will not do SE at night unless the geography is very flat and the lighting sufficient to see what's on the ground (ie full moon).
I'm pretty certain I can achieve a good outcome with an EO LDG... as long as I can see where I'm going.
I'm probably not the only 121 veteran with this mentality. Of course GA for me is just recreation, so might as well go on a nice day otherwise it starts to feel like work.
I will not do SE in IMC anymore, other than to possibly get out of a marine layer at the home drome where I know exactly when and where to turn for the engine-out landing spot.
I will not do SE at night unless the geography is very flat and the lighting sufficient to see what's on the ground (ie full moon).
I'm pretty certain I can achieve a good outcome with an EO LDG... as long as I can see where I'm going.
I'm probably not the only 121 veteran with this mentality. Of course GA for me is just recreation, so might as well go on a nice day otherwise it starts to feel like work.
Actually having an engine failure and making a dead stick landing off field is a wake up call to stop doing stupid stuff.
#30
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,019
Single engine night...just how does one see to make a forced landing? Just how many backup electrical sources does one have? How much performance? How much capability? How many vacuum sources? How much backup instrumentation? What level of redundancy?
Single engine IFR is much the same.
Single pilot IFR is among the most demanding flying a pilot can do. Single engine single pilot IFR all the more so, and at night; one can stack the deck and move the proverbial swiss cheese around just enough that the holes align. It doesn't take much.
I rarely hear an experienced aviator talk enthusiastically about single engine night IMC, but I hear a lot of inexperienced ones defend the practice. Why is that?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post