Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

"Automated" Airmanship

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2018, 04:04 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Omnivorous's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 204
Default "Automated" Airmanship

Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship." I think we all know what is lingering over the horizon... somewhere--AUTOMATED airmanship.

What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?

I suspect we will go single-pilot before the robots take over, doubling the size of the pilot labor force. I am curious to hear what others think about the state of the future.

(Please prove me wrong, by the way).
Omnivorous is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 05:44 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,943
Default

Originally Posted by Omnivorous View Post
Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship." I think we all know what is lingering over the horizon... somewhere--AUTOMATED airmanship.

What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?
You want that from Boeing?

They're delivering 737MAX jets for the next 5-10 years and those jets will fly for 30+ years.

I don't need to tell you what the cockpit looks like...!
contrails is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 05:57 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

GM and Ford didn't develop a driverless car; TESLA did. Similarly, Boeing won't create a pilotless plane (maybe Airbus), but it will likely be a brand new company (that could be bought by a major aircraft manufacturer).

First, that small company will produce a working pilotless plane. That plane will then spend 5-10 years proving that it is safe. Then, someone must build a large part 25 certified pilotless plane. Once some airline buys it, they will have to operate it with 2 pilots for about 10 years before they even think about changing regulations to let it be flown with 1 pilot.

That is about 20 years AFTER someone creates a pilotless plane. Within that time, it is more likely that the economy will crash causing airlines to go bankrupt which will cause the pay rates to be slashed which will make pilots cheaper than R&D.

And as others have said, the major manufacturers will want to extract as much money as they can out of their "legacy" 2 pilot airframes before they really push for a single pilot/no pilot plane. That means they will send tons of money to politicians to scare the public away from a single/no pilot plane until their 2 pilot cash cow airplanes are no longer worth it.

In short, no pilot alive today has to worry about it.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 05:59 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,930
Default

Originally Posted by Omnivorous View Post
(Please prove me wrong, by the way)
You're wrong by the way.
Riverside is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 07:17 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,172
Default

Look around there’s a dozen threads on this subject.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 07:29 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

The nerds may design it, but the beancounters will kill it. 👎
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 02:49 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Danger Close's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: The Best Coast
Posts: 180
Default

I can see a system of acknowledging cpdlc-like commands as IBM Watson spaces traffic before pilotless or single pilot airplanes.
Danger Close is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 03:09 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Retired
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
GM and Ford didn't develop a driverless car; TESLA did... .
Here is how that Tesla "driverless car" thing is going. "Autopilot" was on, right into the back of a parked firetruck.

http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.news...crash-fire.JPG

Tesla is at level 2. The best system right now, and closest to level 4, is Cadillac's (GM). So if the automotive track record is the one to measure by, Boeing is key to the future and that future is very, very far off.
742Dash is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 04:38 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Dirty30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Omnivorous View Post
Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship." I think we all know what is lingering over the horizon... somewhere--AUTOMATED airmanship.

What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?

I suspect we will go single-pilot before the robots take over, doubling the size of the pilot labor force. I am curious to hear what others think about the state of the future.

(Please prove me wrong, by the way).
What's an RNAV? (sarcasm, we don't fly that on the legacy herc)
Dirty30 is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 05:18 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

When automated trains are widespread I’ll start to worry. Right now only small monorail type trains are automated. Once Amtrak, subways and commuter trains are automated than maybe we will see it in aviation. But if they aren’t currently automating 18th century technology I don’t think it’ll happen in our lifetime.
flyguyniner11 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices