Legalized Marijuana and the FAA
04-02-2020, 08:59 AM
#261
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,026
Originally Posted by OOfff
I’m not “taking myself seriously” by discussing the issue. There are opinions that are informed by facts. There are also irrational opinions rooted in historical fearmongering and misunderstanding, which the prohibition on MJ is.
What you are really saying and showing consistently throughout out your posts is there is your opinion and anyone else that has a different opinion cannot possibly have a legitimate reason for their opinion. Your way or no way. That is not conducting a discussion, that is lecturing as an authority which you are not.
However, as we know, your opinion, my opinion or anyone else's opinion on pot has no bearing or effect on any of this.
04-02-2020, 09:14 AM
#262
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Originally Posted by RhinoPherret
Which is just your opinion once again.
What you are really saying and showing consistently throughout out your posts is there is your opinion and anyone else that has a different opinion cannot possibly have a legitimate reason for their opinion. Your way or no way. That is not conducting a discussion, that is lecturing as an authority which you are not.
However, as we know, your opinion, my opinion or anyone else's opinion on pot has no bearing or effect on any of this.
What you are really saying and showing consistently throughout out your posts is there is your opinion and anyone else that has a different opinion cannot possibly have a legitimate reason for their opinion. Your way or no way. That is not conducting a discussion, that is lecturing as an authority which you are not.
However, as we know, your opinion, my opinion or anyone else's opinion on pot has no bearing or effect on any of this.
04-02-2020, 09:23 AM
#263
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Originally Posted by RhinoPherret
Which is just your opinion once again.
What you are really saying and showing consistently throughout out your posts is there is your opinion and anyone else that has a different opinion cannot possibly have a legitimate reason for their opinion. Your way or no way. That is not conducting a discussion, that is lecturing as an authority which you are not.
However, as we know, your opinion, my opinion or anyone else's opinion on pot has no bearing or effect on any of this.
What you are really saying and showing consistently throughout out your posts is there is your opinion and anyone else that has a different opinion cannot possibly have a legitimate reason for their opinion. Your way or no way. That is not conducting a discussion, that is lecturing as an authority which you are not.
However, as we know, your opinion, my opinion or anyone else's opinion on pot has no bearing or effect on any of this.
if you want to play the “we can’t talk about anything because opinions are just opinions,” we can just shut down all discourse on every subject.
04-02-2020, 12:03 PM
#264
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,026
Originally Posted by OOfff
what I’m saying is that the people who disagree have done an insufficient job of justifying their opinion, mostly because they don’t understand MJ and have outdated views informed by historical misinformation, fearmongering, racist policies, and corporate malfeasance. I’m very open to other opinions when they’re intellectually consistent and informed by facts.
if you want to play the “we can’t talk about anything because opinions are just opinions,” we can just shut down all discourse on every subject.
if you want to play the “we can’t talk about anything because opinions are just opinions,” we can just shut down all discourse on every subject.
04-02-2020, 12:08 PM
#265
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by RhinoPherret
I'll tell you what. I was just out working on my property and out of nowhere a stabbing pain in the side of my stomach. I rip off my shirt and see a big old hornet crawling on it. That bad boy hammered me big time.If I was not worried about the route of ingestion, I could even use a dose of medical pot right now. Big time ouchie! lol
04-02-2020, 12:21 PM
#266
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,026
Originally Posted by A Squared
Maybe if it came in a lotion you could rub directly on the sting ....
04-02-2020, 12:59 PM
#267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,470
Originally Posted by OOfff
what I’m saying is that the people who disagree have done an insufficient job of justifying their opinion, mostly because they don’t understand MJ and have outdated views informed by historical misinformation, fearmongering, racist policies, and corporate malfeasance. I’m very open to other opinions when they’re intellectually consistent and informed by facts.
if you want to play the “we can’t talk about anything because opinions are just opinions,” we can just shut down all discourse on every subject.
if you want to play the “we can’t talk about anything because opinions are just opinions,” we can just shut down all discourse on every subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
04-02-2020, 01:54 PM
#268
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Originally Posted by METO Guido
Here you go OOfff. The 1987 wreck of Amtrak 94. A tragic screw up that ultimately prompted the legislative action you now call 'outdated.' Where an engineer & brakeman enjoyed a 'harmless' bone after which 14 passengers and two co-workers got their last ride. You can't understand dependency solely from reading about it. The burden of lobbying change to current safeguards lies in your data, your proof, not the ticketed passengers you're paid to protect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
04-02-2020, 07:21 PM
#269
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Originally Posted by METO Guido
Here you go OOfff. The 1987 wreck of Amtrak 94. A tragic screw up that ultimately prompted the legislative action you now call 'outdated.' Where an engineer & brakeman enjoyed a 'harmless' bone after which 14 passengers and two co-workers got their last ride. You can't understand dependency solely from reading about it. The burden of lobbying change to current safeguards lies in your data, your proof, not the ticketed passengers you're paid to protect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
This can go on all day. Pretty sure there have been some tragic marine accidents too involving huge loss of life and alcohol. The idea that one can use alcohol "responsibly" but not pot is ridiculous.
04-02-2020, 11:19 PM
#270
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by METO Guido
Here you go OOfff. The 1987 wreck of Amtrak 94. A tragic screw up that ultimately prompted the legislative action you now call 'outdated.' Where an engineer & brakeman enjoyed a 'harmless' bone after which 14 passengers and two co-workers got their last ride. You can't understand dependency solely from reading about it. The burden of lobbying change to current safeguards lies in your data, your proof, not the ticketed passengers you're paid to protect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987_M...rain_collision
Eltham Well Hall rail crash
Carrollton bus collision
1991 Union Square derailment
Score is 1 to 3, or 14 to 38, depending on whether we're counting wrecks or bodies. You want to keep playing? I think we both know that I'm going to completely bury you people killed in drunken accidents.
Alternately, we could admit that not one single person here has advocated that pilots or railroad engineers, or Tanker captains, or drivers should be performing their duties intoxicated on anything, and quite trying to knock that strawman down.
