Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
airlines and eco friendly sustainability >

airlines and eco friendly sustainability

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

airlines and eco friendly sustainability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2018, 07:46 AM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 15
Default airlines and eco friendly sustainability

Ive been hearing a lot about how airlines are trying to switch to a more eco-friendly way of doing things. Everything from recycling plastics used on board for eating/drinking to using recycled materials for the carpet. My question is, does anyone else have any other ideas on how airlines or aircraft manufacturers could become more eco-friendly?
diego5614 is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 08:01 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tailhookah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Widget Jet
Posts: 765
Default

Stop flying airplanes. I think we should just turn off the generators and go full mad max. Watch the libs go crazy. I’ve got my guns. I’m ready. It’d be very green. Shut it all down.
Tailhookah is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 08:05 AM
  #3  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

It’s very difficult to structurally change anything as safety can’t take a backbench on eco sustainability.
So seats, carpeting and other interior trim pieces need to meet the fire resistant requirements and everything else that comes with it.
For hygienic reasons very little can be reused due to cost.
With Asian carriers you still get a glass and metal cutlery and real plates.
Doing that in a western country would make that cost prohibitive.

Anyway, stuff you can consider is efficient engines, efficient flying techniques. Preventing hydraulic fluid from getting into ground water.
Airport ramp water runoff collected etc
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 01:32 PM
  #4  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

The biggest thing that can be done is to upgrade the airspace system, so we can go direct to destination as much as possible.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 09-16-2018, 08:22 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Even with Nextgen implementation, the sheer volume of increasing traffic and “hub & spoke” model will result in more “log jams” in the sky. Look for “time based flow” soon. Also, the public will outcry due to changing flight paths (A-RNP departures). There will always be noise complaints, no matter how quiet the turbofans get.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 04:17 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pokey9554's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Cessna 150
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
The biggest thing that can be done is to upgrade the airspace system, so we can go direct to destination as much as possible.

That's not always the most efficient way to go from point A to B.
pokey9554 is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 06:16 AM
  #7  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,018
Default

I'm a lot more interested in a flame-resistant interior than I am making it "Eco friendly."

Unless you want to wrap the passengers up in ferns and carry them beneath giant seagulls, you're going to have to deal with just a bit of man-made eco-unfriendliness.

You'll be happy to know that considerable water vapor is returned to the atmosphere with each gallon or liter of jet fuel burned, though, and that we do pressurize with good old fashioned reusable...air.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 07:17 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,812
Default

Some of the chemtrail dispersal agents actually absoard carbon. Something the lamestream media will never report.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 08:08 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Some of the chemtrail dispersal agents actually absoard carbon. Something the lamestream media will never report.
Is absoard carbon worse than absurd carbon? Maybe an extra neutron or something.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 09-17-2018, 09:47 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,812
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
Is absoard carbon worse than absurd carbon? Maybe an extra neutron or something.
"Absoard" is code.
GogglesPisano is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices