Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Meteorology Depts

Old 12-17-2018, 06:31 AM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 18
Default Meteorology Depts

Is there a widely-accepted consensus among pilots on which major/legacy/lcc has the best meteorology dept? (and by "best" I mean the one that consistently finds the smoothest/safest routing). Also, under the CBA/TA, do pilots cede some/any/all WX-related go/no-go authority?
hrmham is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 07:20 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by hrmham View Post
Is there a widely-accepted consensus among pilots on which major/legacy/lcc has the best meteorology dept? (and by "best" I mean the one that consistently finds the smoothest/safest routing).
No.


Originally Posted by hrmham View Post
Also, under the CBA/TA, do pilots cede some/any/all WX-related go/no-go authority?
No. Federal law specifies that the PIC is responsible. The dispatcher is in the loop, and his input must be considered.

DX could make a no-go call even if the pilot wanted to go. This might happen for operational reasons, ie too much congestion, need slots/gates for other aircraft, or if there was no good diversion airport from an economic perspective. There will always of course be a suitable and legal alternate, but if that alternate doesn't have facilities to handle pax, then they might not want to take the chance of a divert for example.

DX (or anyone else) cannot ever force a pilot to go.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 10:17 AM
  #3  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,998
Default

Routing is largely canned. Smoothest is where you find it.

Meteorology has largely been reduced to a fairly accurate computer model.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 10:36 AM
  #4  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No.
DX could make a no-go call even if the pilot wanted to go. This might happen for operational reasons, ie too much congestion, need slots/gates for other aircraft, or if there was no good diversion airport from an economic perspective.
I get that. What I'm curious about is the opposite; that is, when DX says "go" (weather is good enough from their perspective), but the PIC says "no-go." Obviously, under the regs, PIC trumps DX. But I've always wondered about how those conversations might unfold and whether it would trigger a sit-down with the CP.
hrmham is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 07:06 PM
  #5  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by hrmham View Post
I get that. What I'm curious about is the opposite; that is, when DX says "go" (weather is good enough from their perspective), but the PIC says "no-go." Obviously, under the regs, PIC trumps DX. But I've always wondered about how those conversations might unfold and whether it would trigger a sit-down with the CP.
At any reasonable operation, nobody is going to question the PICs call. Bottom feeder regional maybe, but not even sure about that today.

Obviously this assumes some reasonable concerns, you can't just decide to not fly. Unless you call in fatigued or sick. Then you can.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 10:26 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Default

I could imagine some companies DX would refer the matter to a CP or some kinda on-duty management pilot. I think how the pilots convey the concern is what’ll drive the situation next.
IDIOTPILOT is offline  
Old 12-27-2018, 04:10 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sourdough44's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: Left
Posts: 636
Default

It’s all a trade off, winds, turbulence, altitudes, weather, etc.. Once you get to the area in question it may be 3 or 10 hours after the paperwork was generated. I’ve seen where the computer generated cost index has you about barberpole through moderate chop/turbulence or mountain wave.

Conditions change, some controllers have a better handle on rides than others. I like using current info to adjust as needed. If planned at FL 360, a smooth ride at 280 may not cut it for long, with extra fuel burn.

I guess when the pilotless planes take over, the ‘computers will handle everything’.
sourdough44 is offline  
Old 12-27-2018, 08:19 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

You sorta wonder what happens when turbulence knocks them off line. (Murphy.)
badflaps is offline  
Old 12-27-2018, 08:26 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,099
Default

Lets just say my flights are the smoothest, avoids thunderstorms the most efficiently, and consistently finds the best flight levels with the least head wind/greatest tail wind. Having a Masters in Meteorology and almost two decades experience in aviation meteorology before becoming a pilot helps.
TheWeatherman is offline  
Old 12-30-2018, 08:54 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by IDIOTPILOT View Post
I could imagine some companies DX would refer the matter to a CP or some kinda on-duty management pilot. I think how the pilots convey the concern is what’ll drive the situation next.
If the concern was not addressed to my satisfaction, I would convey my refusal to fly. BTDT several times.

One time, the on-duty CP (who didn't really like my answer) referred the situation to the regional CP the next day. He listened to the tape and looked at the weather and called me to apologize on behalf of the DX and duty CP.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grillemeyer
Flight Schools and Training
13
11-08-2016 09:42 AM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
eraops
Major
6
03-24-2013 07:25 PM
johnnyPilot
Corporate
13
05-05-2009 04:51 PM
CaptainJackson
Corporate
8
05-07-2008 05:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices