High speed rail in the NE
#41
I definitely would. Trains are more convenient. They take you right to city center, and you also don’t have to show up to the train station 2-3 hours early for security screenings. I live in the DC area and it would be way easier and cheaper to take the train (if we have true HSR) from Union Station to Penn Station than to fly out of IAD or DCA to LGA or JFK.
#42
A train on a 1000+ mile run is going to account for a lot more crew/staff man-hours than a jet.
#43
It’s also largely a function of population density. The US has a population density of 36 people per km^2. France has a population of 118 per km^2. Italy is 217 and Germany’s 240.
You simply CANNOT offset that difference with mass transit of any kind. Passenger trains will NEVER be as cost effective in countries with a low population density as they would somewhere with a high population density even if they are cheaper to build there. Moreover, it is particularly sensitive to both the population and population density of the cities served. With a population of 10.25 million in the greater metropolitan area and a population density of 21,500 per square kilometer, Paris France is a near ideal terminus for high speed rail. By comparison, the greater Washington DC area has a population of six million people but a population density of only 419 per square kilometer. You are comparing apples and oranges.
Which makes California’s High speed rail route between Merced (pop. 83,000) and Bakersfield (pop. 380,000) particularly stupid.
You simply CANNOT offset that difference with mass transit of any kind. Passenger trains will NEVER be as cost effective in countries with a low population density as they would somewhere with a high population density even if they are cheaper to build there. Moreover, it is particularly sensitive to both the population and population density of the cities served. With a population of 10.25 million in the greater metropolitan area and a population density of 21,500 per square kilometer, Paris France is a near ideal terminus for high speed rail. By comparison, the greater Washington DC area has a population of six million people but a population density of only 419 per square kilometer. You are comparing apples and oranges.
Which makes California’s High speed rail route between Merced (pop. 83,000) and Bakersfield (pop. 380,000) particularly stupid.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 131
Yes. A HUGE factor is the hourly cost of the staff/crew. Airlines actually optimize cruise flight speed to account for the costs of the crew... to the point where the computer might plan a faster cruise speed if the crew is very senior (and has a higher hourly rate). A more junior crew on the same flight might get a slower speed assigned to save fuel.
A train on a 1000+ mile run is going to account for a lot more crew/staff man-hours than a jet.
A train on a 1000+ mile run is going to account for a lot more crew/staff man-hours than a jet.
Last edited by Spin; 09-04-2019 at 12:36 PM.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 131
Yes but one day this will be forced to change. As our population grows rapidly, there are more and more cars on the road. Eventually our roadways will be so saturated with cars it will be impossible to get anywhere. Where I live I can already see commute times increasing over the past few years. Yeah it’s expensive, but by not “jumping on the train” now, we are just hindering our future QOL when it will be even harder to make these changes.
Futurama transporters would be awesome btw
Futurama transporters would be awesome btw
US politicians sooner or later will have to start thinking about the HSR.
#46
I completely agree with you, we have to think about the future. In a near future, if not already, roads will be saturated -the air too-, making travel unpleasant and inefficient. We also have to think about pollution.
US politicians sooner or later will have to start thinking about the HSR.
US politicians sooner or later will have to start thinking about the HSR.
GF
#48
I agree there's a hypothetical niche for it in the US in a few high-density areas. But good luck seizing all of that land and evicting people from their homes to make way for the infrastructure.. that is simply NOT happening in the US today, people are way too entitled and the system coddles them. It's a real biatch just to build something on land you ALREADY own... You'd need a really big paradigm shift (like a small nuclear war or a massive and sustained economic depression that would shame the Great Depression).
#49
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Of course, there are outliers where each route does have pax travel the whole distance or most of it; over 1000 miles. It depends on the route, of course, but on one of the New York to Miami runs, more than 20% of its riders go over 1000 miles. Of it's 33 station stops, the most popular city pair is between New York and Orlando.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post